haylen:
wish she had more content but i understand how that can go when computers fuck you (prescient remark) but my read is the samevote: sydeney
for everything said before and because with post 173 sydeney seems to really just like to turn super defensive when others point even the slightest finger at him but still enjoys pointing fingers at others. but really my main reason is that there is no case building.
which seems to be the most important part of actually getting things done, you know? and theres not much said so sydeney hangs back, waits for things to happen attempting to slide by unnoticedecho:
im glad echo pursues his own line of inquiry. my read is the same. i disagree with echo and onion about anticollie though and heres why: anticollies style makes me a tad uncomfortable but i buy that he is an analyzer who chillaxes for a while and then comes in with kind of a....surgical post. its a little suspicious to me that cyren and anticollie should treat this last while as a foregone conclusion but this was before replacements and, it makes sense if anticollie is a chillaxer that he should wait to see how people handle the last remaining bit. cyren gets a slight pass but doesnt get as much of a pass as anticollie because cyren seems to have done this: ive made a difference in the game by getting the ball rolling on onion, now im just gonna sit back and reap the rewards. which is like cyren working in the mud with all of us and doing some good work and then going to take a 3 hour break at the gatorade cooler, you know? its like were trying to get this stuff done. so cyren is a little more suspicious to me but not much. sorry for the construction metaphor but you get it, right?
but the thing is with anybodys semi-absence right now is that its like the beginning of summer. its been great here in seattle and so i can only imagine how sweet other places have been. a little northern hemisphere centric, but its all good
well i wasnt defending you in the sense that i was pointing out where cyren may have gone wrong or where i think you were absolutely right and so i dont really see it as a "defense" in that way. but yeah i guess i was defending you by way of character vouch but thats not really "defending" you in the court room sense. thats more like 'yo chill with this because it feels like a mistake' you know? i feel like its not a logical contradiction. but even if it was a contradiction: could that, on purely its own merits be held against me? were human beings we do this stuff all the time, and i think it makes sense to have an even higher frequency of the kind of 'im not sure' inconsistency in a game where all you know is what people are talking about and what your role is and what you think theory wise.157 wrote:being ok with a contradiction in his logic is odd, and his oft used defense of 'it depends on what you mean by defend/attack' is getting old quick. sofist.
