Don't say that. I have read the thread. Admittedly, it was more of a skim-read than a full, in-depth mental analysis of every single post, but I was in the middle of exams at the time. It was just a small, simple mistake. And what do you mean, I don't pay much attention to the arguments of other posters?pikapizza wrote:James.DenholmJames.Denholm wrote:Belili, in your examination of the case against Mev, it seems to be that Mev supports people a fair bit. Isn't this an inherently townie trait?how did he make this mistake...?? mevorra hasn't defended anyone at all in any of his posts. this seems to suggest that he doesn't really pay much attention to the arguments of the other posters, which directly contradicts what he mentioned about "trusting" the "legimatimate reason" made by other townies. (post 291) i find it bizarre he would be so trusting if he can't even be bothered to verify their arguments/read the thread.Belili wrote:By "supports" I meant supports voting for/lynching. Not supports as in defends.
he hasn't made any effort to find scum. he merely "trusts" the reaction of other players and go with the flow, and are happy lynching the biggest target. this seems to be a sign of scummy logic...
You quote 291. Let's have a look at 291:
What are you talking about, trust?James.Denholm wrote:Huh. I only just noticed the other line of pika's post:
I'm not terribly opposed to a Mev lynch because there are others (a lot of others) that are voting for him. It's possible that two scum are on that wagon, sure, but that leaves two townies, two which I hope have legitimate reasons to vote for Mev.pika wrote:he says that he can't see any scum in Mevorra, but he doesn't seem at all opposed to a Mevorra lynch.
More later.