Mini 754 - Frogs Mafia Game, Set and Match.

[scotmany12]

So I should have left my vote where it was and ... what? Waited for a nolynch at deadline? I happen to have two votes on me, so I'm not allowed to move my vote?

You did it yesterday, when there is still a whole day to discuss today. Instead of trying to convince people to vote for ckd, like you should do as town, and only switch when that becomes futile, you just give up and say izzy will be good enough. Your switch was scummy.

I can't tell whether you think further convincing would be futile. You think I'm scummy for switching instead of arguing, so it seems like you think it's not futile; but you stopped arguing, so it seems like you think it is futile.

The only conclusion I can reach here is that you think I'm more persuasive than you are.

Keep inflating that massive ego of yours. Just don't complain when you turn up scum.

[Xylthixlm]

Or maybe you want ckd lynched but don't want to be seen arguing for his lynch right now.

[Xylthixlm]

I can't tell whether you think further convincing would be futile. You think I'm scummy for switching instead of arguing, so it seems like you think it's not futile; but you stopped arguing, so it seems like you think it is futile.

The only conclusion I can reach here is that you think I'm more persuasive than you are.

Keep inflating that massive ego of yours. Just don't complain when you turn up scum.

So do you think convincing is futile or not?

[scotmany12]

Or maybe you want ckd lynched but don't want to be seen arguing for his lynch right now.

I know. It couldn't possibly be that I found someone who is more scummy and more deserving of my vote.

[Xylthixlm]

You were not arguing at the same time I was not arguing. Longer, in fact.

[scotmany12]

I can't tell whether you think further convincing would be futile. You think I'm scummy for switching instead of arguing, so it seems like you think it's not futile; but you stopped arguing, so it seems like you think it is futile.

The only conclusion I can reach here is that you think I'm more persuasive than you are.

Keep inflating that massive ego of yours. Just don't complain when you turn up scum.

So do you think convincing is futile or not?

Um, no.

[scotmany12]

You were not arguing at the same time I was not arguing. Longer, in fact.

Your point?

[Xylthixlm]

You think I'm scummy for switching instead of arguing. But you weren't arguing either. So, either you think that the protown thing to do was for me to just sit there with my vote, or you think the protown thing to do was argue but you weren't doing the protown thing to do yourself. Which is it?

[MacavityLock]

MacavityLock expressed some support for a CKD lynch.

Um... where?

[Xylthixlm]

MacavityLock expressed some support for a CKD lynch.

Um... where?

You're right, you didn't. I'm not sure if I confused you with CDB or if I'm just plain confused.

[scotmany12]

You clearly misunderstand me. You're scummy for placing a vote on your so called second choice to save yourself from getting lynched if you reach 3 votes. Not because you stopped arguing, I could care less about that. If you stayed quiet the rest of the day and left your vote on CKD, couldn't have gave one shit about it. You however made an opportunistic switch onto Izzy to save yourself. Sorry if i wasn't clear. That is why you are scum.

[Xylthixlm]

So you think I'm scummy for doing a protown move that just happens to save myself. Gotcha.

[scotmany12]

So you think I'm scummy for doing a protown move that just happens to save myself. Gotcha.

You know what, sure. You are totally right. I'm voting for you for doing something protown. You saw right through me. Way to go.

[MacavityLock]

No matter what Xyl is, town or scum, it's pro-Xyl. I don't see it as a scumtell.

Sens, you haven't even acknowledged the fact that we're 1 day from deadline. No excuses.

We really need clarification from mod on the rules.

[Xylthixlm]

You sound sarcastic. Are you implying that joining a bandwagon on a scummy player when there's no bandwagon big enough to lynch two days before deadline is

not

protown?

[scotmany12]

You sound sarcastic. Are you implying that joining a bandwagon on a scummy player when there's no bandwagon big enough to lynch two days before deadline is

not

protown?

Already explained myself. Your vote is opportunistic and scummy. It came out of the blue, and only purpose is served was to save yourself from being lynched. And to hopefully cause a mislynch. Not responding to this anymore. Tired of repeating myself.

[Xylthixlm]

only purpose is served was to save yourself from being lynched

Uh, no. If you don't see why it had a protown purpose, you're not even trying to look.

[scotmany12]

only purpose is served was to save yourself from being lynched

Uh, no. If you don't see why it had a protown purpose, you're not even trying to look.

I can see where it would be protown. I probably am stretching a little bit here. This is just how I see it, and my gut is telling me you voted for izzy to save yourself. Not that you truly think she is scum.

[Xylthixlm]

Well, your gut's wrong.

As for not truly thinking Izzy is scum, well, she's one of my top three suspects. She's not my

top

suspect, that's CKD, but I think both of the people who are already on her are town. If someone has to switch wagons to avoid nolynch, it might as well be me and it might as well be now.

As I said in another game: Approaching deadlines make me cynical and calculating.

[Shanba]

4 to lynch, 3 to lynch at deadline. If there is a tie at three votes, then there is a no lynch.

14) At deadline, a majority of a majority is sufficient to lynch. For example, with 12 players, 7 would lynch normally and 4 will lynch at deadline -> the player with the most votes over four is lynched. However, if there are two players on the same number of votes, the player who reached the tie level first will be lynched.

Yeah, this is definitely a contradiction in the ruleset. By Rule 14, Izzy would be our lynch by hitting 3 votes first. By the rule posted in the votecount, we'd have a No Lynch. Clarification please!

Yeah, sorry. The one in the rules is correct - in a hurry, I misr

(As an aside, I am massively against no lynch at deadlines. To me, it seems like the mod punishing the town because the mod hasn't done his/her job properly with prods and replacements. However, with my previous ruleset that simply stipulated plurality lynches at deadline, there was no activity boost that is normally associated with a deadline as there was no need to compromise. My current ruleset is looking for a balance between these two problems. Plus, they give more control over who gets lynched to the most active players - thus providing an incentive to be active.)

Checking to see if deadline has hit.

[Shanba]

About 5 hours to deadline.

[MacavityLock]

@mod

, request votecount with "who would be lynched assuming nothing changes".

[scotmany12]

@mod

, request votecount with "who would be lynched assuming nothing changes".

Right now, Izzy will be lynched.

[MacavityLock]

That's what I thought, but I'd prefer to have mod confirmation on that.

[scotmany12]

I like how sensfan is posting everywhere else but this game. That was sarcasm btw.