s-lullaby 673 wrote:I don't follow. You have justified your vote on Adel today on the ground that she hadn't 'delivered' as a proof of scuminess. Yet your meta was that she did 'deliver' as both town and scum.
At risk of sounding patronizing, it was also in a timely manner. In the other game I saw Adel offer a questionnaire, the results were compiled and fully explained D1, and while a big show was made about how it was
so much work
to compile the answers, it was pretty easy to put together. (And pretty impressive, admittedly.)
s-lullaby 673 wrote:I did respond to other votes on me, did I not?
Ah... yes, you did. I was mistaken. (Those responses were the defensive flare-ups mentioned earlier.)
s-lully 673 wrote:I mean coaching defined as trying to influence a buddy's play.
i.e. You commenting on Adel 'pulling strings' followed by 'I don't think it's necessary'.
The comment in itself kinda don't fit in your scenario of yourself trying to determine Adel's alignment between the lines. Giving hints as to how you think she should act kinda defeat the purpose of observation, no?
I'm not sure if you're hinting that I was trying to pass along a secret message or just misreading, but "I don't think it's necessary" was referring to my decision on whether I should move my vote.
s-lully 673 wrote:The point to the above being? I did pressure Artem a fair bit.
Mostly out of defense from Artem's accusation, and for a total of... two and a half posts, IIRC.
I did pressure Herodotus quite a bit (for what it's worth), and also Adel quite a bit (for what it's worth)... and you regarding your absence and immediate defensiveness, though you never responded (#24).
-----
Adel 674 wrote:1) Third, Vi seems primed to make the kind of wall of word quote battles that won't do much to help the town,
2) and if I were to vote for him OMGUS would be the reply.
1) *reads your posts on Page 29* You can't be serious.
2) Really? Odd that the meta expert accuses me of potentially doing something that I never do. (at least in relation to votes; I have told people they suck on a few occasions though)
Adel 676 wrote:Combined with the way Hero was rapidly hammered yesterday before I got going, I'm looking at the following narrative as a possibility:
SpyreX is scum, and was expecting
me
to push a major case against him. He decided to setup a fake claim of Vig, and started the "if I have a gun" claim yesterday. Once this day started, SpyreX saw that there was a second kill (expected if SpryeX is a SK, unexpected if SpryeX is mafia) and SpryeX claimed.
One thing about all of your theories up to this point - they revolve around YOU. Another thing to note is that you haven't actually pushed a major case against... well... anyone really, until now.
Adel 706 wrote:Vi, SpyreX and Ecto are all voting for me, and they were all in on Hero's lynch as well.
Over half the player list was on the Day 1 wagon
-----
Elmo, yesterday you gave a sarcastic response to Herodotus when he said that he would be inclined to lynch me. Has your opinion changed?
What do you think of the SpyreX/Adel exchange?
-----
Ectomancer 695 wrote:Was this some kind of an attempt at a reverse verbal trap by you Vi? Like if I said he was scummy for dropping it, I was somehow trying to say I was pro-town for sticking to my guns?
Reverse verbal trap? Forget quote walls, this topic is getting bogged down in pseudo-scientific mafiaspeak.
I wanted your opinion on Artem in light of how that was basically what he did and (later) advocated doing. I would later use this to gauge how fluid your opinion was.
Ectomancer 700 wrote:@Spyrex - wtf? There is no reason you should have let yourself be goaded into that. A lack of 2 NK's would have made me believe a lot more in the Vig claim (roleblocker is dead). At least you would possibly have gotten targeted for a kill, but now you just give up that you are essentially a VT after last night?
Why is this phrased as a question? This claim makes it beyond unlikely that SpyreX is an SK. But it seems like you're trying to frame it as scummy.
-----
Adel 706 wrote:btw I'm at lynch -2 -- and Porkens (Mr. "I always hammer" and member of "Bad at Mafia") has posted exactly once during this day.
It wouldn't be bad to hear from him, but this is one of those times when I wouldn't mind an untimely hammer. It's like having zwet around, but awesome.
Adel 710 wrote:I'm calling a SpyreX
+ 2 out of (Porkens
+ Vi
+ Ecto
) scumgroup. I'm willing to vote for any of the three.
This looks a whole lot like what Artem got blasted for D1...
I freely acknowledge I don't understand Adel 710. 711 is what Adel would term "blather". But I see SpyreX's post quoted in 713 as being rather unhelpful on a pragmatic level - not that it influences my opinion of his alignment.
It still feels like there are only a few people playing this game. We need more player variety ITT.
Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.