Mini 754 - Frogs Mafia Game, Set and Match.
-
-
Shanba So win
- So win
- So win
- Posts: 4072
- Joined: January 3, 2007
- Location: Up a Tree
Yeah, I lost internet connection yesterday or I would already have been trying to find a replacement for citizen karne. I've already extended the deadline once and don't particularly wish to do so again, but I understand replacements need some time to bed in and its better to get a replacement before phase changes anyway. So y'all get an extra week from when I find a cit karne replacement.(10:50:24 PM) xcaykex: GODDAMNIT I DONT WANNA GET RID OF MY TENTACLE RAPE PORN
Ribbit.-
-
Xylthixlm !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: July 12, 2006
-
-
MacavityLock Impin' Ain't Easy
- Impin' Ain't Easy
- Impin' Ain't Easy
- Posts: 2486
- Joined: August 14, 2008
Quote pyramid hacked together for ease of reading. I didn't change any content, I promise.
The more I think about it, the more I think this is a clear scumtell from Izzy. While the "illogical conclusions and tunneling" read on ckd is totally reasonable right now based on his interactions with dahill, it wasn't when Izzy posted her quick reads on everybody on day 2. I double-checked, and I don't see anything from ckd on days 1 or 2 that would fit. Therefore, it seems obvious to me that Izzy was making stuff up then and tried to find something to say now that would fit when Xyl asked about it. I don't know if this scumtell has a name, but I'm going to call it "backfill". And Izzy backfilled.DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:
My past experience with CKD is that he's rather prone to making questionable judgments and drawing illogical conclusions when town while gettign tunnelled on issues that are of minor importance at best. I don't see his play in this game as being inconsistent with that.Xylthixlm wrote:
Izzy, could you elaborate on your read on CKD here?DizzyIzzyB13 wrote: curiouskarmadog - Behaviour consistent with past experience of CKD town play. Probable town.Vote: Izzy
P.S. Thanks Shanba.-
-
dahill1 bagel
- bagel
- bagel
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: March 4, 2008
This is an excellent catch. Dizzy, explanation?MacavityLock wrote:Quote pyramid hacked together for ease of reading. I didn't change any content, I promise.
The more I think about it, the more I think this is a clear scumtell from Izzy. While the "illogical conclusions and tunneling" read on ckd is totally reasonable right now based on his interactions with dahill, it wasn't when Izzy posted her quick reads on everybody on day 2. I double-checked, and I don't see anything from ckd on days 1 or 2 that would fit. Therefore, it seems obvious to me that Izzy was making stuff up then and tried to find something to say now that would fit when Xyl asked about it. I don't know if this scumtell has a name, but I'm going to call it "backfill". And Izzy backfilled.DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:
My past experience with CKD is that he's rather prone to making questionable judgments and drawing illogical conclusions when town while gettign tunnelled on issues that are of minor importance at best. I don't see his play in this game as being inconsistent with that.Xylthixlm wrote:
Izzy, could you elaborate on your read on CKD here?DizzyIzzyB13 wrote: curiouskarmadog - Behaviour consistent with past experience of CKD town play. Probable town.Vote: Izzy
P.S. Thanks Shanba.-
-
Citizen Karne rossobud
- rossobud
- rossobud
- Posts: 488
- Joined: August 15, 2008
Many things are occurring at once.
I should be active by next week. Sorry, last week of high school is a lot more difficult and time-consuming than I thought it would be.Games are slowing. No one wants to hammer for fear of a mislynch. MS needs a savior. They look for Rosso to save them, but alas! he is nowhere to be found. So one man will step up and take his mantle. Fear not MS, the hammer cometh!-
-
dahill1 bagel
- bagel
- bagel
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: March 4, 2008
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Updating from page 37…typing as reading.
why the fuck will you not answer the question...you implied that scot had a problem with asking you question...he didnt....the answer to 2 and 3 is he didnt...you made it up...now here is a new question that you will probably go to the ends of the earth to avoid..Xylthixlm wrote:
So CKD, how about instead of harassing me about whether and when I'm going to read the game, you answer questions 2 and 3?
WHY did you say that scot had a problem with you asking questions when in fact he never implied anything of the such? One more question(and you should appreciate this one). Why do you have a problem with me asking you questions? You must if you went to this extreme to avoid answering mine?
==
Noting that it could 3 pages of pushing to get Xyl to read the game.
==
two notes on this exchange....Xyl, you are not fucking scum hunting (at the point of this post)...if you were doing everything you could you would have read the fucking game.Xylthixlm wrote:Sigh. Excuse me while I snap here.
DizzyIzzy: I amtrying to fucking scumhuntin the best way that I can, and you areactively opposing my efforts. Just because you think that right way to catch up on a game is to read it from page 1 and moving forward doesn't make it so, and I will read the game inany damn order I want to. I do not intend to ignore everything that has gone before. Now, give meone fucking reasonI should not assume you are being uncooperative because you'refrightened scum. And while you're at it, if you're town it wouldn't hurt you toanswer the damn questions.
Dizzy, you are being as stubborn as Xyl...why? There is no reason not to proivde you opinions on players or whatever he was asking. How is that pro town?
Both of you are being fucking anti-town, hypocritical, and scummy. Xyl is a fucking joke by saying dizzy is being uncooperative when he has refused to answer my questions.
==
Why?DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:I'm not refusing to answer them, I'm just not doing it until he's read the game.
==
wait, you are talking about questions you have posed? I thought I addressed the questions you asked...looking back.Xylthixlm wrote:Okay, confession time #2.
On that basis, curiouskarmadog (who answered question #1 but skipped #2 and #3) and DizzyIzzy (who is refusing to answer my questions at all) look pretty bad. I'll concentrate my read on them.
Xylthixlm wrote: 1) Who do you think is scum? Name at least two people. Briefly, why?
2) Did any of the role reveals surprise you? Whose? Briefly, why?
3) Any events that you think are extra-important for me to read?
That answers question 1….2 I thought was a silly question…nothing surprises me in this (or any) game. As for question 3, I mention at least once in this post that you should go back and read this interchange between dahill and I and form your own opinion…did you miss it?curiouskarmadog wrote:Ok got 20 minutes to post something.
Top two scum.
First dahill, reason 1.) (rehashed) I really think you need to read how and when things happened…but the skinny of it was this. In a discussion about a traitor (ironically helping dahill) I post a game that I was in where I was scum. Later Dahill posts..
This rubbed me wrong. To me it seemed like he was just trying to look like he was scum hunting. I had already posted one game. That fact he was asking me to post “some” games, seemed like he had not read the first game I had linked. Which made me wonder if he was really trying to get a read on me..why did he not read that game. He states that he did indeed read the game, but wanted more. Which is fine. If he has asked me for “more” games it would not have hit my radar. The fact he asked for “some” seemed like he really wasn’t reading. Yes is semantics…but the fucking devil in is the details.dahill1 wrote:@CK and ckd: I'd like to see some games of you, if any, as scum
2.) Out of the gate today he was through more suspicion on Dizzy who I feel is town…you really need to read the game to see what is going on here.
3.) he was still pushing a case on RR (who has not been posting) and is in fact gone and not just lurking.
The other CK.
CK hit my radar early game (read the game to find out why)….now appears to be lurking until a wagon hits…..the under the radar bit until heat gets going is suspicious
Right now, I am not digging RR replacement at all…his entrance to this game has been super scummy…refusing to answer questions, refusing to read the game until he was forced to, implying that scot said something he blatantly didn’t, and implying that I am not addressing questions…when I did (with the exception of question 2…which doesn’t seem relevant.)
==
from post 923.Xylthixlm wrote:Here's the first post where CKD gives any indication he believes anyone else to be town (aside from a brief mention of Izzy earlier)...
Funny that his strongest town read on anyone who isn't role-confirmed is "on the fence, but leaning town". He's definitely leaving himself wiggle room to come out as suspicious of anyone here.
I left myself wiggle room?...bullshit. I am one of the only person at this point in the game to express my opinion and scum hunt. CK and RR are not posting so how am I suppose to get a read off them?..asking questions….I love how you take a scum hunting post and say I am leaving myself wiggle room. I also state that RR has risen on my scum list….and also express my suspicion of dahill.
I state in that post I feel that dizzy and scot are town…and say that ML is under the radar, but I feel townish vibes off him….
Wiggle room my ass….
At that point I felt he was town(ish), which I mention in a later post….felt dahill, ML, RR were the question marks..after rereading more and a couple more posts from CK…my opinion changed from townish to on the fence and changed again later to scummish….my opinion of ML changed too..he went from question mark to townish.Xylthixlm wrote:Also, the first post there, where he says "that leaves dahill, ML, and raging". CKD: What happened to Citizen Karne in that list?
==
What made me vote you to begin with was the “some” vs. “more” comment. The more I talked about it the more I was certain you were scum. But as scot pointed out…the “some” could have been for CK benefit and I was added on the question. I can see his how that might have occurred…so my “catch” might not actually be a catch. I still don’t like your play (for already stated reasons)..but not enough for a vote.dahill1 wrote:Ckd, it appears that I'm your top scum candidate at the moment..but you're not voting for me. In fact, you recently just unvoted me. Any reason for that?
Dahill, another question for you (thought I asked this already, but don’t see it)..you asked CK and I for games….CK only said he has not been scum in any games…does that mean you didn’t want him to post any other games?...I never saw I follow up to that..why?
==
Xylthixlm wrote:
Mmm.DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:mikeburnfire - Scum. Should be hammered.
Gorrad - Also scum. Needs lynching.
dahill1 - Seems consistently productive. Lean town, don't rule out scum playing well, though.
curiouskarmadog - Behaviour consistent with past experience of CKD town play. Probable town.
Raging Rabbit - Lean town-aligned idiot. Play is more stupid than scummy.
scotmany12 - Tunelled on Gorrad. Good target, though. Lean town, possible scum, particularly in the unlikely event that Gorrad flips town. Also potential serial killer if we have multiple scum groups, though I think that's unlikely.
MacavityLock - Productive. Forward thinking. Lean town.
Citizen Karne - Productive, if misguided. Weak town lead, possible scum.
Thestatusquo - Potential third scum. Null read so far, potentially scummy behaviour today could be due to personal issues. Still.. my favoured target for member #1 of a three man team.
Izzy, could you elaborate on your read on CKD here?
Wait a fucking minute…you posted that at 706DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:
My past experience with CKD is that he's rather prone to making questionable judgments and drawing illogical conclusions when town while gettign tunnelled on issues that are of minor importance at best. I don't see his play in this game as being inconsistent with that.Xylthixlm wrote:Izzy, could you elaborate on your read on CKD here?
At that time..we were BOTH voting for MBF..as a matter of fact..you were yelling for MBF’s hammer. What was I doing at this point that was a “questionable judgement” or an “illogical conclusion”?…you agreed with me. Why does this feel like you are saying what you think Xyl wants to hear?
==
ok, but now that appears he is reading the game..what is your excuse?DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:
Negative. There is a very pro-town reason to be opposed to doing your work for you - namely, that it prevents you from playing as lazy scum and simply coming to concllusions based upon other people's answers which you can then blame them for to avoid suspicion if we were to lynch a town player. Frankly, the fact that you asked those quetsions before reading a game is scummier than my refusal to answer them until you've read it.Xylthixlm wrote:
Your "principle" is stupid and scummy. There is no protown reason for you to not answer until I finish reading; it's just a stalling tactic.DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:That's a stupid approach, Xyl. I'm not refusing to answer your questions. I said I would answer them when you finish your re-read. You completely invalidate any point to your approach by announcing what you intend to do before the point at which I'd said I'd answer your questions, suince now there's no way for you to test whether I was trying to avoid answering or, y;'know, actually sticking to the principle that you should be reading the whole damn thread. Nice work, scum.
==
Ha..ML explains better why Dizzy’s post bothers me. “backfill”….ML you should wiki that for credit
Caught up…MacavityLock wrote:
The more I think about it, the more I think this is a clear scumtell from Izzy. While the "illogical conclusions and tunneling" read on ckd is totally reasonable right now based on his interactions with dahill, it wasn't when Izzy posted her quick reads on everybody on day 2. I double-checked, and I don't see anything from ckd on days 1 or 2 that would fit. Therefore, it seems obvious to me that Izzy was making stuff up then and tried to find something to say now that would fit when Xyl asked about it. I don't know if this scumtell has a name, but I'm going to call it "backfill". And Izzy backfilled.Vote: Izzy
P.S. Thanks Shanba.
Was thinking the RR/Xyl had to be scum until Dizzy's recent posts.
want to hear both answer my questions...
I want CK to fucking post anything.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
MacavityLock Impin' Ain't Easy
- Impin' Ain't Easy
- Impin' Ain't Easy
- Posts: 2486
- Joined: August 14, 2008
There's no reason they can't both be scum. Scenario: Xyl-scum asks his buddy Izzy a seemingly innocuous question that could likely be answered reasonably and un-scummily. She responds with (to me) something very scummy. Neither Izzy nor Xyl respond to my accusation, even though Xyl has been posting elsewhere on site.curiouskarmadog wrote:Was thinking the RR/Xyl had to be scum until Dizzy's recent posts.
I'm not sure if this is what's going on or not, but this is to say that Izzy's increased scumminess has not decreased Xyl/RR's in my book.-
-
dahill1 bagel
- bagel
- bagel
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: March 4, 2008
I generally don't really read games of people as town if I'm meta-ing them because there is no universal town-tell, but there are some common ones as scum. Play as town can fluctuate a lot from game to game, but scum play still has the basic concepts (keep scumbuddies alive, try and hop on easy lynches, etc.)curiouskarmadog wrote:Dahill, another question for you (thought I asked this already, but don’t see it)..you asked CK and I for games….CK only said he has not been scum in any games…does that mean you didn’t want him to post any other games?...I never saw I follow up to that..why?-
-
dahill1 bagel
- bagel
- bagel
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: March 4, 2008
-
-
Xylthixlm !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: July 12, 2006
If by "reading the game" you mean starting at page 1 and reading every post in order, as if they were some exceptionally boring novel, no, I do not plan on doing that. It's a waste of my time.curiouskarmadog wrote:Where did you indicate that you were going to read the game before deadline if at all before this post? Are you planning on reading the game before deadline...if so when?..if not why?#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net
"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Xyl needs to post and start providing shit. All he has been doing is quoting shit and making one liners that have absolutely no sustenance to them. This includes answering ckd's questions, which he is right in saying you ignored. Izzy, answer xyl's question. This is not for xyl's benefit; I want to know where you currently stand. CK, post something useful.
My gut is still telling me that ckd is scum, but I will be okay in lynching xyl.-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Stop fucking playing mafia right now. Either don't fucking replace in anymore, or fucking read the game like you are fucking supposed to fucking do.Xylthixlm wrote:
If by "reading the game" you mean starting at page 1 and reading every post in order, as if they were some exceptionally boring novel, no, I do not plan on doing that. It's a waste of my time.curiouskarmadog wrote:Where did you indicate that you were going to read the game before deadline if at all before this post? Are you planning on reading the game before deadline...if so when?..if not why?-
-
Xylthixlm !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: July 12, 2006
Yes, good, you expressed suspicious of people. Scum do that a lot. What you didn't do was say who you werecuriouskarmadog wrote: I left myself wiggle room?...bullshit. I am one of the only person at this point in the game to express my opinion and scum hunt. CK and RR are not posting so how am I suppose to get a read off them?..asking questions….I love how you take a scum hunting post and say I am leaving myself wiggle room. I also state that RR has risen on my scum list….and also express my suspicion of dahill.notsuspicious of. Scum don't do that very often. As it was, if you later picked a player and decided you needed to attack them, there would be nothing in your posts to contradict that. That's "leaving yourself wiggle room".
Dizzy and scot are partially role-confirmed. "Under the radar but I feel a townish vibe" is a ton of wiggle room.curiouskarmadog wrote:I state in that post I feel that dizzy and scot are town…and say that ML is under the radar, but I feel townish vibes off him….
By this point in the game you should have several people you think are town for non-role-related reasons. Who are they?
I don't believe that for a moment.curiouskarmadog wrote:2 I thought was a silly question…nothing surprises me in this (or any) game.#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net
"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi-
-
Xylthixlm !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: July 12, 2006
I have no idea who decided that I am fucking suppoed to fucking read the game from page 1. I've tried reading games from page 1 and I get nothing out of it. I do better by picking a person, filtering to just their posts, getting a sense of their play, and then clicking through to any posts that catch my attention and reading the surrounding context; rinse and repeat for the rest of the players in the game.scotmany12 wrote:
Stop fucking playing mafia right now. Either don't fucking replace in anymore, or fucking read the game like you are fucking supposed to fucking do.Xylthixlm wrote:
If by "reading the game" you mean starting at page 1 and reading every post in order, as if they were some exceptionally boring novel, no, I do not plan on doing that. It's a waste of my time.curiouskarmadog wrote:Where did you indicate that you were going to read the game before deadline if at all before this post? Are you planning on reading the game before deadline...if so when?..if not why?#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net
"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi-
-
Xylthixlm !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: July 12, 2006
I am curious what sort of shit you're expecting me to provide.scotmany12 wrote:Xyl needs to post and start providing shit. All he has been doing is quoting shit and making one liners that have absolutely no sustenance to them.#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net
"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi-
-
dahill1 bagel
- bagel
- bagel
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: March 4, 2008
-
-
scotmany12 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: January 13, 2007
Up until now, all you have been is quoting and writing one sentences that provides nothing, unless you are yelling at izzy, in which are being hypocritical. But good for you, you actually trying to do something now. Even though you are horribly wrong.Xylthixlm wrote:
I am curious what sort of shit you're expecting me to provide.scotmany12 wrote:Xyl needs to post and start providing shit. All he has been doing is quoting shit and making one liners that have absolutely no sustenance to them.-
-
Xylthixlm !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: July 12, 2006
Hmmm.dahill1 wrote:
Wait...what?Xylthixlm wrote:Dizzy and scot are partially role-confirmed.
This is like the opposite of Gorrad's theory except just as scummy. I can understand Scot, but to me Izzy is in no way confirmed or partially-confirmed.
Okay, I'll give you the point on neighbors/unconfirmed not really being role-confirmed. (I've been seeing more put-in-masons-but-make-them-unconfirmed lately, so I don't think that they're more likely to have a scum.)
crywolf's behavior toward archon really doesn't feel like a scum neighbor. If you were a scum neighbor, would you really want to press the idea that one of you has to be scum and get your town neighbor lynched? That seems like it would get you lynched next with high probability.
It's always possible cayke did it for the WIFOM, or just didn't think through what would happen, but ... nah. It doesn't feel right.#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net
"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi-
-
Xylthixlm !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: July 12, 2006
Actually I've mostly been trying to find good questions to ask. Asking questions is a good thing which I don't do enough of except when I replace. This may explain why my record as a replacement is better than my record where I started the game.scotmany12 wrote:
Up until now, all you have been is quoting and writing one sentences that provides nothing, unless you are yelling at izzy, in which are being hypocritical. But good for you, you actually trying to do something now. Even though you are horribly wrong.Xylthixlm wrote:
I am curious what sort of shit you're expecting me to provide.scotmany12 wrote:Xyl needs to post and start providing shit. All he has been doing is quoting shit and making one liners that have absolutely no sustenance to them.#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net
"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi-
-
dahill1 bagel
- bagel
- bagel
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: March 4, 2008
or the possibility that crywolf was just bad scumXylthixlm wrote:
Hmmm.dahill1 wrote:
Wait...what?Xylthixlm wrote:Dizzy and scot are partially role-confirmed.
This is like the opposite of Gorrad's theory except just as scummy. I can understand Scot, but to me Izzy is in no way confirmed or partially-confirmed.
Okay, I'll give you the point on neighbors/unconfirmed not really being role-confirmed. (I've been seeing more put-in-masons-but-make-them-unconfirmed lately, so I don't think that they're more likely to have a scum.)
crywolf's behavior toward archon really doesn't feel like a scum neighbor. If you were a scum neighbor, would you really want to press the idea that one of you has to be scum and get your town neighbor lynched? That seems like it would get you lynched next with high probability.
It's always possible cayke did it for the WIFOM, or just didn't think through what would happen, but ... nah. It doesn't feel right.-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
Xylthixlm !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: July 12, 2006
-
-
Xylthixlm !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: July 12, 2006
Here we are.
I didn't say he had a problem with my questions.curiouskarmadog wrote:
not answering my questions.Xylthixlm wrote:Everyone thinks I should read the game, I get that. I also get that people think RR was scummy (for lurking... sounds justified), nothing I can do there. Right now I'm trying to get a handle on the game and form some opinions on who's scum, andI can do that better by asking questions first and reading later.
where did scot imply that he had a problem with your questions?
No. Happy?Did you indicate anywhere before that post that you intended to read the thread?#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net
"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi-
-
Xylthixlm !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- !xmafia win
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: July 12, 2006
CKD, I have a question for you. Why are you acting as if you're pissed that I didn't answer questions which you obviously already know the answer to? When I ask a question like that, I consider it a "rhetorical question" and don't expect an answer.#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net
"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.