Ad wrote:Our win conditions are not different, he just doesn't seem to have one. The whole explanation of the miller thing was also included in the win condition in my role pm so it makes sense that he doesn't have that either. This makes sense given that zwet said there might be a few minor changes between peoples role pm's to prevent a mass claim breaking the game.
Uhm, no. Rox asked later what his win con is. Zwet gave him his win con, and in this one, there is no men a be a mil ac to Rox.
Al, do not twist the mod's words:
Zwet wrote:Also, please note that I might have changed the wording of different role PM's to suit my fancy.
Where's the part a mass claim brea the game?
Ac, think a this, it re me of
this. I say that one of the scum is caught due to an er made in the role Pri Mes of Rox and Ad (the no win con thing) and that zwet is try to fix this er with the a quote.
Al, while look back, I saw this:
Rox wrote:i win with the non-scum faction
Rox wrote:It would have been full quoting had I used town.
Rox wrote:The one that knows,thinks, and feels nothing.
These quotes are in or as post by Rox. Note that he first says that he does not want to full quote, but when it came down to 'cha role', he had no pro with that.
Ex please.
Ad wrote:Furthermore on the "he's town", "he's probably town", "I think he's town", "I can't 100% confirm he's town" thing - it basically boils down to something similar to what mafiassk said: while my role tells me there is another chocolate town out there this person might only be "chocolate town" in name and not necessarily in alignment.
Stu Post Re...
May I as that you switched your stance, be you saw your role Pri Mes?
Af I have an ans of this, I will con.
.