While I will note that EmpTyger plays like an extremely hardened version of how I used to play, you're being extremely self-centered (and coming from me that's saying something) in specifically telling us who we can and cannot lynch, and making it clear that you're monopolizing the votes. There is no flexibility here. You can be assumed Town all you like, but that doesn't mean you'reXtoxm 724 wrote:That has nothing to do with anything.
Vi sounds just like Emptyger-scum: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 35#1472135
right
. In fact, EmpTyger touched on this in that topic--EmpTy 558 wrote:Some unsolicited advice for your next game: the game of mafia is half about figuring out who the mafia is, half about convincing people of it. It doesn’t matter how confirmed you are; calling someone mafia isn’t the only way of discrediting someone. N2, there never was any real question about whether to kill you or Appassionata first, even though I thought he was unlikely to attack either me or xofelf.
(This generally seems to me to have been the town’s downfall. Too many innocent players were playing so badly (sometimes unintentionally, sometimes deliberately) that they lost most or all of their credibility. Us mafia could play however we wanted without much fear- even when one player did stumble onto us {SC D1, Xtoxm D3, TA D4}, they couldn’t get any traction.)
