1. Am I supposed to say something along the lines of "Wow that was stupid of me, I just messed up." or more like "I'm mafia, hahaha, quicklynched!" The only real way to respond is to list why I did it... which I have.Hero wrote: 1. He tried to justify lynching a townie.
2. Tenchi hammered only 30 minutes after hockey L-1'd, making it look like a scum quick lynch.
3. When questioned about it the next day, he tried to avoid the question by saying CJMiller could've been scum all along. A contradiction.
4. This was all followed by general scumminess behavior throughout the rest of D@(as serial pointed out). He was active lurking, not really making any suspicions, arguments weren't very strong.
5. He hasn't been quicklynched yet.
2. OR it could have been a scum quicklynch without my involvment. Because scum can't communicate during the day that would have been just pure luck that he was on right then and that nobody else could argue it or remove their votes. Suggesting that I made that vote knowing that Tenchi would come in is blatantly ridiculous.
3. Well gee its easy to know he isn't scum NOW...
4. I wasn't actively lurking, I have forgotten about this game and at that time I was busy with (C'mon you can guess
) hockey games and tests.5. That leads us to either: you're scum, I'm scum. So obviously to me it proves you're scum.
Okay, as to me not *interacting* with Kiku, you had that same thing about Toledo yet neither of us are guilty. I really don't think I have to say anything more than that, you can look back for instances when I have if you really want to.
Anyways, at this point I'm gonna have to
Vote:Hero
and I'm actually wondering why I didn't do this before because atleast for me (I can trust in my own innocence) hes the only for sure scum. anyways heres a little analysis of each player.... in alphabetical order!
Feeres: Has popped in to give very good analysis of the events, nothing really groundbreaking but still good. If hes scum hes simultaneously really good and bad. Good because theres nothing suspicious, but bad because he hasn't really led the town anywhere. Anyways, I highly doubt that and as I said hes always had a good analysis. Except for the issue on D1 I had with him
Hero: As I've said the fact that I haven't been quicklynched proves his guilt. To me atleast, I know everybody else can't be sure.
Kiku: The fact that she is willing to ignore whether hero is lying or I am is slightly disturbing. Even assuming Tenchi is guilty isn't safe because if she chooses Hero tomorow and I'm mafia it'd be pretty easy to quick lynch or vise versa. Because of that she really should be discussing this situation.
Tenchi: He makes some valid points but I'm wondering if you could explain what exactly this means:
Do you mean you'd still do that lynch again knowing hes town? Or that you'd just have him lynched by now? Or what exactly?Tenchi wrote:I don't know what kind of justification he used by I still stand by that I'd rather have CJMiller lynched now/ not be in lylo.
At this point I know Hero is guilty with (this part isn't for sure) either Tenchi or Kiku as a scum buddy. Noting the amount of arguement between Tenchi and Hero as the late serial pointed out means that its highly unlikely, making Kiku the scumbuddy which would make sense as shes not voting for me or hero. However I still do not discount Tenchi.
