Mini 790- Skywalker Mafia: Game Over

[ZazieR]

So...

@ort

they are all voting for the millers for cross-confirming each other, which means at best we will simply be wasting a day/night cycle and quite possibly being two townies down.

this was just to prevent miller WIFOM later... but...

Apparently I figure most (all) of you want to keep these millers in this game.

I suppose I can't disagree with that - MafiaSSK

knew

the miller role (chocolate townie), I suppose he

must

be a miller with ThAd.

The

only

problem we have now is if they're both scum. I don't see a way to prove that except if one of them die.

I shall

unvote

for now.

Chang your vote af be called out, I will re this.

[ZazieR]

So Azhrei, based on your assumption that I am a bad player all because of one mafia game because I risked a role claim, you're saying that you're an awesome mafia player by claiming miller because we should believe you?

Eh?

[ZazieR]

Al, two cho town of which one did not have a win con at the start. Why would one have a win con, while the o does not? The mod could have co and pas.
I am not buy their claims.

So the other theory is that we, as scum partners, decided to try a gambit that would out both of us but we forgot to make sure we had the same win condition etc. sorted out beforehand.
So basically you are accusing me/ssk of being idiots.

Nope.
But I am hav pro buy that the same role is pre twice, and can con the o.

[Azhrei]

So Azhrei, based on your assumption that I am a bad player all because of one mafia game because I risked a role claim, you're saying that you're an awesome mafia player by claiming miller because we should believe you?

I second the 'eh?'


You were pretty bad in your first game, and I've yet to see any noticeable improvement, excepting the fact you are posting more now. You've posted no real content, and much of what you've said has made little sense. Like the quoted post.

MafiaSSK and ThAdmiral, given that you have claimed Millers (aka Chocolate Townies), can you also reveal your character roles?

The one that knows,thinks, and feels nothing.

Woah, woah, woah.

Unvote

That is way too close to part of my pm. I suddenly find your claim somewhat more believable. I think it might be best to leave our millers alive for the time being.

[ThAdmiral]

Al, two cho town of which one did not have a win con at the start. Why would one have a win con, while the o does not? The mod could have co and pas.
I am not buy their claims.

So the other theory is that we, as scum partners, decided to try a gambit that would out both of us but we forgot to make sure we had the same win condition etc. sorted out beforehand.
So basically you are accusing me/ssk of being idiots.

Nope.
But I am hav pro buy that the same role is pre twice, and can con the o.

But I am having problems buying that the same role is present twice, and can con? the o?

can you elaborate on the last bit + make corrections if I am wrong

[Santos]

Post restriction. She can't not keep it up. Please tell me you've played more games since Sushi Mafia? Pleeeeeease.

Why are you begging the question?

@ZazieR, what is going on in post 222?

[Kreriov]

@ThAdmiral - I think 'con the o' means 'confirm the other'

@ZazieR - Well, I would rather the doc have the choice than the scum. The doc is hidden and the scum now have a WIFOM choice as to who to target at night. That is just fine by me. Let them sweat it a bit.

@Azhrei - Suddenly you realize they have a pm that somewhat resembles yours? Really?

FOS: Azhrei

[Sironigous]

wait, what?

Maf, ThAd, and Azhrei?...

So.. 3 millers?

doubt it. o_O

let's see...
we know ThAd is chocolate...
we know MafiaSSK is chocolate...

er... Azhrei...

maybe chocolate?

I guess...

I have my eye on
ThAd
MafiaSSK
Azhrei

---

From what I understand, ThAd's pm says that he knows there is

one

other miller out there.

Of course, Azhrei could just have a role pm worded just a little differently, and have a completely different role. *sigh*

[Azhrei]

Post restriction. She can't not keep it up. Please tell me you've played more games since Sushi Mafia? Pleeeeeease.

Why are you begging the question?

@ZazieR, what is going on in post 222?

Why do you keep active lurking?


Also, I asked as I was hoping that you would perhaps be a useful player this time.

[Azhrei]

Also, @ Kreriov, the "One who feel, thinks, knows nothing" part, is almost identical to one line in my pm.

@ Sironigous, I have a different role, yes, but I am intrigued as to why the millers are having similar pms to me. Would you like a roleclaim?

[Sironigous]

@Azh --- oh no no no. Don't claim.

Un-I got my eye on everyone

I listed.

[Santos]

Azhrei, why am i 'active lurking' and what does it mean? Where are examples of this and why?

[zwetschenwasser]

I am considering modkilling MafiaSSK. I will make my final decision soon

[Sironigous]

egack! no no no don't! Modkills are scary.

SILENCE FOOL

[Santos]

I am considering modkilling MafiaSSK. I will make my final decision soon

If a decision is made for this modkill, then I am inclined to venture elsewhere than hang around this 'miller' talk.

I think mafiassk's miller claim is much weaker than thad's, like he's trying to set himself up for thad's lynching to get himself in the clear. We should lynch mafiassk.

Do you have other reasons for wanting to lynch mafiassk? Why would he be the best option for Day 1 as opposed to anyone else who has claimed/ or not claimed? Who do you want to push for should mafiassk is modkilled?

[Azhrei]

Azhrei, why am i 'active lurking' and what does it mean? Where are examples of this and why?

Active lurking means that you try to appear active by posting often, but you don't actually ever contribute anything. Like, what you're doing.

Asking me questions like the ones you have asked (which, make no sense, and seem to have no bearing on the game) are examples of this.

However, your most recent post is a deviation forom this, and contains some lovely lovely content.

@Zwet

. Would I be right in thinking it was because he quoted, not paraphrased, oh merciful overlord?

[ZazieR]

Al, two cho town of which one did not have a win con at the start. Why would one have a win con, while the o does not? The mod could have co and pas.
I am not buy their claims.

So the other theory is that we, as scum partners, decided to try a gambit that would out both of us but we forgot to make sure we had the same win condition etc. sorted out beforehand.
So basically you are accusing me/ssk of being idiots.

Nope.
But I am hav pro buy that the same role is pre twice, and can con the o.

But I am having problems buying that the same role is present twice, and can con? the o?

@ThAdmiral - I think 'con the o' means 'confirm the other'

[ZazieR]

Post restriction. She can't not keep it up. Please tell me you've played more games since Sushi Mafia? Pleeeeeease.

Why are you begging the question?

@ZazieR, what is going on in post 222?

Can you be more spe?

[ZazieR]

@ZazieR - Well, I would rather the doc have the choice than the scum. The doc is hidden and the scum now have a WIFOM choice as to who to target at night. That is just fine by me. Let them sweat it a bit.

This.
Be, the doc can now act as a kind of vig, so he should choose be try to pro or try to kill.

[ZazieR]

Also, @ Kreriov, the "One who feel, thinks, knows nothing" part, is almost identical to one line in my pm.

@ Sironigous, I have a different role, yes, but I am intrigued as to why the millers are having similar pms to me. Would you like a roleclaim?

No role!!!
Ad has al ex how there can be some si.

But why did you ask if you should role?

[ZazieR]

Azhrei, why am i 'active lurking' and what does it mean? Where are examples of this and why?

Ac lur - post with con.
Ex: See your posts in i
Post 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and more, but then my Post Re will be an is.
(In ze)

Though some play need to come o.

Mod

- May I use my prod stick and grind ?

[ZazieR]

I am considering modkilling MafiaSSK. I will make my final decision soon

But mod ruin the game...
Al, why and what are the rules re mod?

[ZazieR]

I am considering modkilling MafiaSSK. I will make my final decision soon

If a decision is made for this modkill, then I am inclined to venture elsewhere than hang around this 'miller' talk.

I think mafiassk's miller claim is much weaker than thad's, like he's trying to set himself up for thad's lynching to get himself in the clear. We should lynch mafiassk.

Do you have other reasons for wanting to lynch mafiassk? Why would he be the best option for Day 1 as opposed to anyone else who has claimed/ or not claimed? Who do you want to push for should mafiassk is modkilled?

Why do you on ques Sting a his vote, and not o?

[ZazieR]

Threep
Ying
Lab
Sting

a to say?

[ThAdmiral]

@ThAdmiral - I think 'con the o' means 'confirm the other'

Got it.

@ zaz:
Firstly I can't 100% confirm ssk, but I don't see why there would be a miller scum; that just doesn't make sense.
So in a sense, yes I do confirm him.

However if some of us had information about the presence of other roles, such as you, why do you think it is unlikely that we would also know about the presence of other roles? If we were scum we would have had to have guessed that this was the setup before attempting our gambit.
Furthermore you still haven't addressed the fact that it is highly unlikely for two scum members to put themselves in the spotlight like we have.

I have a question for you. If you are suspicious of us do you think we are both scum, or do you believe it is possible that only one of us is scum?