Mini 790- Skywalker Mafia: Game Over

MafiaSSK · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 7:00 am

MafiaSSK wrote:
ortolan wrote:that is different to my win condition

Unvote
Vote: MafiaSSK
It was a stupid paraphrase. I can't say the t word.

EBWOP:Forgot the tw word. I mean town by that.

ortolan · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 7:02 am

you didn't need to, that is still different from my win condition

MafiaSSK · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 9:13 am

ortolan wrote:you didn't need to, that is still different from my win condition

Paraphrase yours then

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 1:26 pm

With anger, Jonathan Kemp (Skywalker in the long-delayed-soon-to-come flavor) cursed at the air. He got out of bed and walked towards the police station to inquire for the umpteenth time about the fate of his lost wife...

Sting(1)- Guybrush Threepwood
Guybrush Threepwood(1)- Santos
ThAdmiral(3)- Kreriov, Sting, Sironigous
MafiaSSK(2)- Sajin, Ortolan

With 12 alive, 7 to lynch!

Zaz, you may use numerals, as long as you don't spell out any that are more than a syllable long. Also, you may use any smilies you wish. Also, please note that I might have changed the wording of different role PM's to suit my fancy.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 1:27 pm

Part of the flavor is in the opening post now. It's not yet finished, and I'll update it as I finish more.

Lab Mafia · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 2:55 pm

No one is suspicious for me yet.

Lab Mafia · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 2:56 pm

Haven't read much so far so i need to read this soon.

Azhrei · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 3:08 pm

Hm, I just rechecked my role pm to check whether mafiaSSK's win condition was different to mine, and I discovered that i also do not have a win condition. I have pm'd zwet about this.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 3:24 pm

AYMAMAMIA Silence all of you confused people. I kill you all!

Azhrei · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 3:35 pm

Hm, seems that zwet just has an alternative view to what 'win condition' means.

As such, my win condition is also different to MafiaSSK's.

ortolan · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 3:38 pm

What is it roughly?

MafiaSSK · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 3:50 pm

ortolan wrote:What is it roughly?

Paraphrase yours. NAO

Sting · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 4:26 pm

I think mafiassk's miller claim is much weaker than thad's, like he's trying to set himself up for thad's lynching to get himself in the clear. We should lynch mafiassk.

unvote; Vote: MafiaSSK

ThAdmiral · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 6:58 pm

this game is funny

there seems to be almost a complete lack of logic on display, and the most talkative person is unintelligible.

ZazieR · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Ok, some is ve fish a the mil claims.
Both knew that there was a role like theirs, which they al know is town, though not know who.
Rox al did not try to look for the one he knew was town. Not to for that he wait with his vote a Ad. So if he true thinks that lynch a claim mil is good day one, why did he not sup this right at the start?

Lynch one of them is the way to go, Rox is my choice.

ZazieR · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 8:20 pm

MafiaSSK wrote:
ortolan wrote:that is different to my win condition

Unvote
Vote: MafiaSSK
It was a stupid paraphrase. I can't say the t word.

I'm a chocolate townie, paraphrasing here that the cops will have a great time with me. no win condition was included in the role

't' word^^

EBWOP:Forgot the tw word. I mean town by that.

't' word^^

Ad has no pro as well with the 't' word by look at his posts. Ex, NAO.

ZazieR · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 8:21 pm

ortolan wrote:that is different to my win condition

Unvote
Vote: MafiaSSK

If this is the case, DIE!

ZazieR · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 8:22 pm

MafiaSSK wrote:
ortolan wrote:you didn't need to, that is still different from my win condition
Paraphrase yours then

So that your bud know what to claim? I op Bear say his win con.

ZazieR · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 8:27 pm

Lab Mafia wrote:No one is suspicious for me yet.

Mil thoughts?

ZazieR · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 8:28 pm

Azhrei wrote:Hm, seems that zwet just has an alternative view to what 'win condition' means.

As such, my win condition is also different to MafiaSSK's.

So why no vote?

ZazieR · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 8:44 pm

ThAdmiral wrote:this game is funny

there seems to be almost a complete lack of logic on display, and the most talkative person is unintelligible.

Then do some o than com!

ZazieR · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 8:46 pm

Al, two cho town of which one did not have a win con at the start. Why would one have a win con, while the o does not? The mod could have co and pas.
I am not buy their claims.

Azhrei · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 9:00 pm

ortolan wrote:What is it roughly?

Essentially, I have to kill scum. It does not explicitly state that I will win at a certain point, it is more implied. (Like I said, Zwet has an alternative view.)

What is yours, roughly?

Also, Zaz, no vote yet as I am curious as to SSK's reponse, i forgot, and i am now curious about orto's win condition.

Santos · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 9:16 pm

So instead of 'Vanilla' the millers are 'Chocolate'.

I don't think we should lynch one of them to prove what we already know its going to be. What does everyone else think?

ortolan · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 9:17 pm

I think yours is the same as mine Azhrei.

Mine implies there is only one anti-town faction who must all no longer be living in order for me to win

fake edit: actually if there were multiple mafias then there might still be multiple factions