Mini 788 - Fantasy Mafia [OVER]

[Mixologist]

vote Goatrevolt

He's from Virginia.

[Mixologist]

unvote

vote Shadow Knight

obvscum I mean look he started this whole andy bandwagon and hasn't said anything since.

[Mixologist]

unvote

vote orangepenguin

Post boy!

[Mixologist]

Not quite, you're halfway there though. We just need to quicklynch Sudo_Nym

Because that makes sense?

unvote

vote ortolan

[Mixologist]

@Orto- the word quicklynch shouldn't happen on day one unless its got the word don't somewhere nearby.

I don't know, from what I'm reading site wide, quicklynch/D1/empking go well together.

[Mixologist]

I'm glad my attempt at humor was not lost on all. I was hoping more people would respond so I could gauge some reactions on that. However, all I got was an OMGUS vote by Empking. Guess that will have to do.

[Mixologist]

unvote

Ortolan's opening behavior, after re-reading, comes across more as trying to attract responses. Which it apparently has. I'm not willing to vote Andy at this point yet though. Would like to see how he responds.

@Mod- Can we get prods on our MIA's?

[Mixologist]

Also before I forget:

@Mod- I will be V/LA the 23rd and 24th. Expect little to no content.

[Mixologist]

Tony would you respond to Goat's request for evidence of why being scum is a town-tell. I am confused over the thought process.

[Mixologist]

Will be doing a proper post after making dinner and putting my daughter to sleep. Roughly three or so hours.

[Mixologist]

So, this isn't the extensive post I wanted to make, the wifey brought home a nice bottle of champagne and we've been indulging ourselves tonight. I'll have my thoughts complete tomorrow.

Quick post though.

@KMD- I can see why you think why Andy is scum, but why do you think, outside of distancing, that Goat and Starbuck are his scum buddies?
@Starbuck- What are your thoughts on to this point?

[Mixologist]

vote Starbuck

[Mixologist]

@all- Sorry for lack of participation this past week. Real life issues have been forcing my hand and I haven't been able to delegate my time to the games I am in as much as I would like to. Things have been resolved and I should be more active starting now. Outside of my V/LA this weekend for a wedding I am in.

---

As for the issues at hand:

@ortolan - It appeared to me that she ignored my question in 126. There is a slight chance that she missed it. However, that fact that she acknowledges that she saw OP and I vote her means that she has read through my question and decided to not answer. So I decided to swing a vote her way and see how she reacted. To me it seems that she overly reacted for no reason.

@Starbuck - It would appear to me as well that you overreacted for one vote on you. OP jokevoted you twice and immediately unvoted you each time. At the time of post 136, I had the only vote on you. Would you please respond to my question I posed to you in 126?

[Mixologist]

I did read it. If I'm looking for something in particular, in this case your reaction, I'm not going to give a reason. To me it seems you are overly defensive off of this one vote. If you instead asked why I was voting you, I probably wouldn't be as suspicious as I am.

[Mixologist]

It was directed to Starbuck.

However, since I have your attention, what do you think about her bringing up the possibility of someone being lynch immune?

[Mixologist]

Keeping my vote on Starbuck for the time. I don't like the way she started speculating about roles.

@Andy- That's fine and dandy to say that, but without filling out the rest of the statement to go along with that, it's a fluff post at best. Who do you find most likely to be scum at the moment?

@Shadow- You still working on that post?

[Mixologist]

Gah. Re-reading Zazier's entrance.

Vote stays with Starbuck right now as I don't like how she is trying to explain away her entrance into speculation about roles due to the "Fantasy theme".