-XylBot- Game over! Winners page 56.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #58 (isolation #0) » Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:11 pm

I'll try to get onto this at the weekend... just saying hi for the moment...

except to BSG

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #121 (isolation #1) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 12:20 am

!vote UnofficialRulerOfEveryone

Talking about scum jumping out of windows... Hi UROE!

Tar needs to cool down, and roflcopter needs moar hugz

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #205 (isolation #2) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:36 am

Phate is actually correct...

Still need UROE lynch for very obv reasons.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #218 (isolation #3) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:27 am

I'm an experienced IRC player, and I say we lynch UROE

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #259 (isolation #4) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:38 am

Massclaiming is bad in this game for the simple reason that IRC has time pressure in it (You had to copy your role in a few seconds), where here you can study the setup and then copy a role. Ergo, bad idea.

UROE lynch, gogogo

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #379 (isolation #5) » Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:36 am

Limited access... if you feel to replace me please do.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #435 (isolation #6) » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:23 pm

I'm glad everyone forgot I was ranked 6th before the reset.

!vote Tanarin

Obvscum

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #463 (isolation #7) » Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:17 am

[quote="Xylthixlm"]

Hasdgfas replaces KaleiÃ

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #485 (isolation #8) » Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:14 pm

Kevy wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.
Or, you know, nothing happened. Because MUP has a 25% of doing nothing.

Do you not know how your own role works? Hmm, see, that's funny.

And you're still not voting tubby even though you're adamant about him being scum..

I'll let everyone else connect the dots here.

The dots say you are pushing something that can be misleading, considering zwetsch never found out what it did, so assumed it was protection. What it actually was is irrelevant since it didn't do anything.

I'm sticking to my Tanarinvote since I don't see a reason for me to switch

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #496 (isolation #9) » Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:51 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:btw, I'm not voting tubby because xtotm is scummy.

I was wondering...

Makes sense then.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #498 (isolation #10) » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:14 am

Shadow Knight wrote:Ok, seriously, I'm gonna scream if I have to say this again.

I am not defending DGB.

I am attacking tubby.

I feel that tubby is acting scummier than DGB.

That is why I am voting him.

Why are you defending DGB?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #527 (isolation #11) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:08 am

Can we lynch Tanarin by now?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #588 (isolation #12) » Sun Mar 08, 2009 3:59 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:Sure. I'm in.

!vote Phate

No

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #675 (isolation #13) » Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:01 pm

!vote tanarin

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #706 (isolation #14) » Sat Mar 14, 2009 5:14 am

>_>

!Vote tubby216

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #711 (isolation #15) » Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:43 am

[quote="DrippingGoofball"][quote="KaleiÃ

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #757 (isolation #16) » Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:44 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:We need MOAR
DGB
/tanarin/
hascow
votes.

ffixed

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #759 (isolation #17) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:11 am

Your vote says otherwise

so yes

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #762 (isolation #18) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:10 am

armlx wrote:!vote zwetschenwasser

More Zwet votes.

Tomorrow. We're doing Tanarin today.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #764 (isolation #19) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:18 am

Tanarin

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #774 (isolation #20) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:46 am

tubby216 wrote:
would somebody like to tell me why
tan is scum
?

You covered it up pretty well.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #819 (isolation #21) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:13 pm

2 more votes people. I know we can do this.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #858 (isolation #22) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:25 am

Tanarin is lying. He's not an SS. Unless SS can also be scum.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #878 (isolation #23) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:13 pm

Unvote

Let's do this.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #880 (isolation #24) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:41 am

oh, and in case that didn't count

!unvote

Let's get this over with

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #883 (isolation #25) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:35 am

!vote tanarin

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #885 (isolation #26) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:44 am

Because I hammered scum.

For the reason why I did it instead of someone else, read back.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #887 (isolation #27) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:55 am

Either Tanarin is scum and we did something good, or I'm scum and I get SS'd. Seems a win-win to me.

Unless there is a option three

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #896 (isolation #28) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:00 am

Somehow I don't believe that anymore. You results so far have been worse then 9/11 so far, and your play gives no town cookies either.

!vote tubby216

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #925 (isolation #29) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:51 am

more tubbyvotes plz.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #930 (isolation #30) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:10 pm

add some steam and ill hop on

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #932 (isolation #31) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:18 pm

ok

!unvote
!vote hascow

tubby next, k?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #964 (isolation #32) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:10 am

screw you guys, you offered a quicklynch.

Back to tubby!

!vote tubby

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #972 (isolation #33) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 10:37 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:TUBBY IS NOT SCUM. HE HAS A GOOD CLAIM AND LOOKS LIKE A GOOD PERSON.

I concur

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #978 (isolation #34) » Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:34 pm

[quote="tubby216"][quote="KaleiÃ

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1012 (isolation #35) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:27 am

no, we should lynch tubby....

Unless there is a wagon I can jump on that does steam?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1087 (isolation #36) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:12 am

!vote Tubby

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1089 (isolation #37) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:19 am

I have reason to believe tubby is lying

Not concerning my role, but role interaction.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1110 (isolation #38) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:33 am

I can explain if people want to, but I think I've proven far more that I'm trustworthy then tubby is.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1114 (isolation #39) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:19 am

Totally

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1136 (isolation #40) » Sun Apr 05, 2009 3:13 am

I'm terribly confused.

Vir was a roleblocker variant, tubby claimed to be blocked and I was blocked ever since Tanarin died. This would implicate three roleblockers?!

This seems really hard to believe.

Anyway, I might as well claim. I'm a cop. I can investigate people to see what alignment they are. I investigated ani N1 (town) and Tan N2 (scum, ergo I knew I was sane). Since Tan died, I was blocked. Tubby claimed to be blocked as well during these days, which seemed near impossible to believe, because that would mean more then one roleblocker. After Vir died, a

random

roleblocker, this implicated that there are three roleblockers... This was impossible to believe, so I had to get him lynched. Being in the situation I am now, I feel stupid for going the road of "Scum-Role hunting" instead of "Scum-Play hunting".

I'll need to do a reread tomorrow.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1138 (isolation #41) » Sun Apr 05, 2009 3:40 am

Unlikely. Random cops are not often generated by xylbot.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1149 (isolation #42) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:00 am

Massclaim sounds good.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1156 (isolation #43) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:48 am

What's a warp again? It sounds familiar...

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1158 (isolation #44) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:00 am

A few things:
1. Why Kill instead of Protect? Especially if you have powerroles you can protect.
2. IIRC (Though someone should run some testsetups of Chaos on IRC, since somehow I can't join it), Combat Medic is a role used in Multirole only, since it is a combined role (vig+doc). All other confirmed roles so far are one sided roles.

In short, I think you are lying, but verification would be nice.

Mod: Could you send me a couple (20 or so) testsetups of Chaos via pm?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1159 (isolation #45) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:04 am

Read: Chaos = Wacky. Somehow I was under the impression it was named Chaos XD

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1161 (isolation #46) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:12 am

Well, someone just ran some testsetups, and I was wrong. That's what you get for not playing IRC for 2 years now XD

Anyway, it's still weird.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1162 (isolation #47) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:17 am

populartajo wrote:Choosing killing instead of protecting is pretty obv, I guess.

Not really... Not if we have powerroles to protect.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1164 (isolation #48) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:17 am

[quote="populartajo"][quote="KaleiÃ

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1167 (isolation #49) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:24 am

I'm tempted to vote this alpace creature after what he told us.
I want more thoughts first though

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1173 (isolation #50) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:33 am

[quote="populartajo"][quote="KaleiÃ

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1174 (isolation #51) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:34 am

Kevy, if what you say is true, I'm willing to let go alpaca for today.

However, Warp = always town doesn't mean empking = town. Just noting.

Either way, if we go after one of the townies, I rather go for cow.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1177 (isolation #52) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:56 am

I'm not saying I don't believe it. I'm saying we shouldn't believe you are town because you are warp, because you could be lying about being a warp.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1193 (isolation #53) » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:53 am

I guess his lynch was inevitable anyway at some point. Let's just hope we're right.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1230 (isolation #54) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 8:35 pm

Alright, first things first: If we think there is 2 scum left, we should lynch xtoxm today.

If not, we should probably lynch either hascow, alpaca or empking, though pref hascow. I think it's stupid to lynch tar at this point, and rofl at all.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1276 (isolation #55) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:24 am

I told you I haven't been receiving results since I caught Tanarin. That's also the reason why we lynched tubby. Pay attention.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1278 (isolation #56) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:38 am

Yes, there is. Unless another role can prevent receiving investigations.

Also, xtoxm can be confirmed survivor, he can easily swap and play for his own. TBH, I'm not feeling comfortable with him being around.

Hascow seems like a good lynch regardless. But as long as we're still talking.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1280 (isolation #57) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:43 am

How? Don't you think if he has the chance between easy pick or thinking over it if doesn't matter to him? It's simply how survivors

play

. I'm not taking into consideration about what he says, because he would get lynched if he would say if he'd help the scum, so he will obviously say what we want to hear.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1281 (isolation #58) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:52 am

Oh, and the example is obviously referring at a L-1 LyLo. I'm actually concerned people think so light-headed about a survivor. It reminds me of "Lynch-The-Jester" Games XD

Anyway, have we reached a consensus about voting hascow? This seems like the best option today.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1305 (isolation #59) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:43 am

If there are two scum left, it should be emp and alpaca. If one, I think alpacascum is more likely.

Also, what was up with the quicklynch yesterday ffs

As for my investigations:
N0: ani
N1: tan
N2: tubby
N3: cow
N4: emp
N5: cow
N6: emp

Lacked results since N3

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1308 (isolation #60) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:48 am

I don't like your claim

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1314 (isolation #61) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:55 am

Unless anyone still want to discuss anything (or can convince me otherwise), I will be voting alpaca.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1316 (isolation #62) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:57 am

Then convince me. I'll hear your case. Though I doubt you can come up with something good.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1322 (isolation #63) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:06 am

Tar was confirmed by zwet iirc, so it's unlikely he's scum.
xtoxm is confirmed survivor

If we have two scum left, it should be you and emp.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1326 (isolation #64) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:08 am

Experienced IRC players: Can Godfathers also have the Coward ability? If not, I should be pretty much confirmed town - I've been crumbing Coward since D1, zwets's N0 result is consistent with me being a Coward, and zwet got an innocent investigation on me D2.

No, GF's can't be cowards

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1329 (isolation #65) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:13 am

!Vote: populartajo

I don't see a reason to wait. Alpaca and emp have to be the last scum.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1330 (isolation #66) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:13 am

[quote="populartajo"][quote="KaleiÃ

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1336 (isolation #67) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:15 am

Not on your demand. If Tar would like emp dead before you, I'd be fine with it. Otherwise, vote stays

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1337 (isolation #68) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:16 am

IRC veterans: Can Cop be a Mafia role?

I'm not going to answer this one for obvious reasons

Mod, can the cop role be scum?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1339 (isolation #69) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:17 am

Why don't I want to lynch you?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1341 (isolation #70) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:18 am

LOL, no you're not.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1343 (isolation #71) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:20 am

Neither are unless 1 scum is left, in which case I would still believe it's you.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1345 (isolation #72) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:21 am

Yes. And his role is more plausible then yours.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1348 (isolation #73) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:24 am

populartajo wrote:How?

Not functioning role < Role with occasional effects

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1350 (isolation #74) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:26 am

You're probably bussing, but it doesn't matter.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1352 (isolation #75) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:30 am

Well, there's still the chance that there is only 1 scum.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1356 (isolation #76) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:34 am

Xtoxm wrote:The night after we lynched Vir, Zwet killed Arm. Scum had no reason to. Where do you propose that kill went, if not from Emp hitting it?

Other side of the twin, armlx, no kill, forgot to send in.

Alpaca: I've already explained you why you are the more likely target.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1358 (isolation #77) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:38 am

It does. It would better explain the lack of results from me/tubby then yours.

Also, can we have a rolepost of warp again. I've been searching the thread but can't seem to find it.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1360 (isolation #78) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:40 am

This, though I would add that I find the Twin explanation most likely (can Twins have different alignments?)

It's quite common, if not always. Been a while since I last played IRC

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1362 (isolation #79) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:41 am

after asking shanba and jd, not always, but common

Also Tar, if I was scum wouldn't it be more common if my copclaim was a lie instead of me being a copscum?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1363 (isolation #80) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:42 am

populartajo wrote:But Tar, why Scope is confirmed Cop?
And why does he prefer me over Empking for no reason at all?

I ran a wagon on Tanscum.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1366 (isolation #81) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:44 am

Kale: I had forgotten about the Twin, butr doesnt the other half nullify when Tan dies?

After asking, it didn't. So I guess that rules that out.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1367 (isolation #82) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:44 am

[quote="populartajo"][quote="KaleiÃ

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1378 (isolation #83) » Wed Apr 22, 2009 1:55 am

xtoxm, you are a moron. If the town loses this because of your recent lack of xylbot experience, I will be pissed off. Since Xylbot was upgraded last year, players

can

perform two abilities at the time.

Anyway, not much to say here. I suggest you think this through correctly Tar, because I don't want to lose this game by xtoxm's lack of experience. Aside of that, How do you even consider the odds of me bussing a scummate if there are only 3 scum in total in the game.

Tar, I'm willing to answer all your questions if you still doubt about emp being scum.

!Vote Empking

Either way, well played Emp. I think alot of people underestimated your claim.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1382 (isolation #84) » Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:59 pm

Cheerleader Tar. It remains on one random target. That's the only logical explanation.

The reason why empking is scum is obvious. There is no one else left that can be. Empking has played a laid back game, and jumped from wagon to wagon to proceed through the game. About 3/4 of his game posts are votes with little to no explanation to it. He didn't do any scumhunting at all, because he didn't need to do so. The only thing that got him so far is a claim that sounded

plausible

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1384 (isolation #85) » Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:05 am

1. I explained that
2. Hypocrit
3. I've started playing again, for obvious reasons
4. Yes I can

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1386 (isolation #86) » Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:22 pm

xtoxm. Because he would go after me, regardless. So I guess empking made a good choice there.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1389 (isolation #87) » Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:38 am

1. I agree. I lynched scum. You?
2. I agree. I lynched scum. You?
3. Well, just recently. I missed Multichosen

4. Yes I can

But it's obv your baised anyway

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1391 (isolation #88) » Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:12 pm

Well, Emp might not have killed you in case you were a continues hider. You've been quite vague about your role so far.

Since you apparantly don't have questions anymore, my final statement on why emp is scum:
You've suspected me on my role interaction. Emp is suspected by scummy play. We've totally discarded his role so far, which should've revealed popped up somewhere over the last eigth days, but didn't.

I hope you make the right decision, Tar. Good luck Emp.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Sat Apr 25, 2009 12:14 am

Well, it's obvious you would say that now.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Sat Apr 25, 2009 10:28 am

Empking wrote:Due to it being the truth?

I don't know your reasons for killing xtoxm over Tar or me, but I guess you can eleborate that post-game.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1403 (isolation #91) » Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:46 pm

Whoa Tar. I was soooo obviously busted when xtoxm posted that comment. It was even in the rules. I'm suprised I won this, because I've had the odds against me all game.

Also, sorry Tan <3

KaleiÐoscøpe · Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:10 pm

[quote="Kevy"][quote="KaleiÃ

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1421 (isolation #93) » Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Tanarin wrote:Woah...how the hell did we do it? Honestly, with Vir disapperaring and Kscope posting NOTHING AT ALL on the scum quicktopic, I was figuring we would have lost. Kscope, why did you not post on the scum topic? Not very teamlike if you ask me.

Well, I was inactive during Night 1 due too RL stuff. After that it went downhill and I discussed with Vir via pm that night.