-XylBot- Game over! Winners page 56.

[tubby216]

No we don't.

why not??

[Kevy]

I'm calling it now - there's a missing kill N1 and N2, there are two scum factions (either Mafia + SK or 2x Mafias), DGB is from one faction and tubby is from the other.

Either order works for me. We'll worry about larger threats when we're closer to endgame.

!vote tubby

Then vote DGB first. No one is really defending tubby, but DGB has some pawns (namely zwetchen and Shadow Knight) trying to defend her until the very end. I'll call it now: DGB is the leader of one of the said factions and has a powerful role (cult leader, GF, something similar). Cult could also explain the single kills per night. It's a stretch, but DGB needs to be lynched regardless. Something is way fishy about the DGB/zwet/SK interactions.

[zwetschenwasser]

I'm defending DGB because I agree with her. Is that a crime?

[Kevy]

And zwetschen, you never answerered my question.

WHAT DID YOU DO NIGHT 0?

[Kevy]

[quote="Xylthixlm"]

||| MAFIABOT || VOTE COUNT (9 to lynch) |||
||| MAFIABOT || DrippingGoofball - 3 (roflcopter tubby216 Tarhalindur) |||
||| MAFIABOT || Phate - 2 (Empking's_Alt Vir4030) |||
||| MAFIABOT || tubby216 - 2 (DrippingGoofball Shadow_Knight) |||
||| MAFIABOT || Xtoxm - 1 (zwetschenwasser) |||

[size=0]armlx BSG KaleiÃ

[zwetschenwasser]

I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.

[Kevy]

I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.

Or, you know, nothing happened. Because MUP has a 25% of doing nothing.

Do you not know how your own role works? Hmm, see, that's funny.

And you're still not voting tubby even though you're adamant about him being scum..

I'll let everyone else connect the dots here.

[Tarhalindur]

I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.

Question for players with more experience with IRC: Would MUP be told if the ability failed to resolve (due roleblock or something similar)? I assume no, but I want to double-check. This is a matter of the utmost importance.

(Zwet, if you're lying about your role as town... AGAIN [yes, I've seen him lie about role as town before*]... it's time to spit out the truth.)

* - speaking of that, I just thought of something. Why hasn't DGB made a peep in this game about Zwet's meta of lying as town to stimulate discussion here?

[Tarhalindur]

I'm calling it now - there's a missing kill N1 and N2, there are two scum factions (either Mafia + SK or 2x Mafias), DGB is from one faction and tubby is from the other.

Either order works for me. We'll worry about larger threats when we're closer to endgame.

!vote tubby

Then vote DGB first. No one is really defending tubby, but DGB has some pawns (namely zwetchen and Shadow Knight) trying to defend her until the very end. I'll call it now: DGB is the leader of one of the said factions and has a powerful role (cult leader, GF, something similar). Cult could also explain the single kills per night. It's a stretch, but DGB needs to be lynched regardless. Something is way fishy about the DGB/zwet/SK interactions.

Cult should be dead (unless there's two...). Methinks tubby is SK and DGB is Mafia. Question is, are we better of getting rid of the Mafioso or the SK today?

Eh, Mafia first.

!vote DGB

[tubby216]

well first off i am not an sk nor am i scum, but we should get rid of scum first,

i kept wondering why too that zwet would be all about dgb being innocent and me scum but soesn't back that up with a vote?

and where the hell is armix??

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.

Or, you know, nothing happened. Because MUP has a 25% of doing nothing.

Do you not know how your own role works? Hmm, see, that's funny.

And you're still not voting tubby even though you're adamant about him being scum..

I'll let everyone else connect the dots here.

The dots say you are pushing something that can be misleading, considering zwetsch never found out what it did, so assumed it was protection. What it actually was is irrelevant since it didn't do anything.

I'm sticking to my Tanarinvote since I don't see a reason for me to switch

[Kevy]

I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.

Question for players with more experience with IRC: Would MUP be told if the ability failed to resolve (due roleblock or something similar)? I assume no, but I want to double-check. This is a matter of the utmost importance.

The MUP would be told that they were blocked if they were blocked. However, if the MUP simply protected or did nothing (which don't give any sort of confirmation like kill and inspect do), there would be no message. Is that what you're asking?

[quote="KaleiÃ

[Kevy]

Oh, and by inspect/kill confirmation, I mean how you would get your inspect result and how you would see your target dead the next day (unless there's outside interference).

[Tarhalindur]

I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.

Question for players with more experience with IRC: Would MUP be told if the ability failed to resolve (due roleblock or something similar)? I assume no, but I want to double-check. This is a matter of the utmost importance.

The MUP would be told that they were blocked if they were blocked. However, if the MUP simply protected or did nothing (which don't give any sort of confirmation like kill and inspect do), there would be no message. Is that what you're asking?

The real question is, would a MUP be told his ability failed if he targeted an untargetable player N0?

[Kevy]

I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.

Question for players with more experience with IRC: Would MUP be told if the ability failed to resolve (due roleblock or something similar)? I assume no, but I want to double-check. This is a matter of the utmost importance.

The MUP would be told that they were blocked if they were blocked. However, if the MUP simply protected or did nothing (which don't give any sort of confirmation like kill and inspect do), there would be no message. Is that what you're asking?

The real question is, would a MUP be told his ability failed if he targeted an untargetable player N0?

No.

[Tarhalindur]

I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.

Question for players with more experience with IRC: Would MUP be told if the ability failed to resolve (due roleblock or something similar)? I assume no, but I want to double-check. This is a matter of the utmost importance.

The MUP would be told that they were blocked if they were blocked. However, if the MUP simply protected or did nothing (which don't give any sort of confirmation like kill and inspect do), there would be no message. Is that what you're asking?

The real question is, would a MUP be told his ability failed if he targeted an untargetable player N0?

No.

In that case, I'm going to go ahead and call Zwet mostly cleared. He got the right N0 result, too.

Yes, this is a softclaim that I am a role that was untargetable N0 and targetable N1.

[zwetschenwasser]

I am not lying. I am a mup, and I know that I could have done nothing as a possibility.

[DrippingGoofball]

I am not lying. I am a mup, and I know that I could have done nothing as a possibility.

You know the scum will do everything they can to discredit you. I'm taking notes.

[zwetschenwasser]

Do you have a response to Tar's earlier question?

[Xtoxm]

I'm agreeing with Scope at this point.

!vote Tanarin

[zwetschenwasser]

btw, I'm not voting tubby because xtotm is scummy.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

btw, I'm not voting tubby because xtotm is scummy.

I was wondering...

Makes sense then.

[Shadow Knight]

Ok, seriously, I'm gonna scream if I have to say this again.

I am not defending DGB.

I am attacking tubby.

I feel that tubby is acting scummier than DGB.

That is why I am voting him.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Ok, seriously, I'm gonna scream if I have to say this again.

I am not defending DGB.

I am attacking tubby.

I feel that tubby is acting scummier than DGB.

That is why I am voting him.

Why are you defending DGB?

[Empking's Alt]

I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.

Question for players with more experience with IRC: Would MUP be told if the ability failed to resolve (due roleblock or something similar)? I assume no, but I want to double-check. This is a matter of the utmost importance.

The MUP would be told that they were blocked if they were blocked. However, if the MUP simply protected or did nothing (which don't give any sort of confirmation like kill and inspect do), there would be no message. Is that what you're asking?

The real question is, would a MUP be told his ability failed if he targeted an untargetable player N0?

No.

In that case, I'm going to go ahead and call Zwet mostly cleared. He got the right N0 result, too.

Yes, this is a softclaim that I am a role that was untargetable N0 and targetable N1.

What r9oles can do that?