Now you make a decent defense. *Rolls eyes* You couldn't just defelct me temporarily to keep momentum and argue your case (You did) and reveal it once you thought you caught scum? If this was a gambit, it wasn't very good or strong.kabenon007 wrote:Ok, I didn't get that that was what you wanted. I thought you were going along the more Wulfy line of, "I don't see your valuable information, please quote all of it for me." I can do what you ask, although there isn't much, because as I am pretty sure I said, most of the information gathered Day 1 becomes useful Day 2 once one or more corpses have been identified and roles disclosed.
When I jumped on your wagon, the biggest thing I was looking for: people who would jump on my wagon after someone else got the ball rolling on me.
That reason is the reason I suspected Pablo, _over9000, and kirroha. Wulfy got the wagon going, and though I hated his playstyle, it wasn't the kind of reaction I was looking for and therefore didn't pursue. Pablo then voted for me, followed by kirroha, followed by _over9000. I bantered back and forth with Pablo and over9000 and liked what I got out our discussions, found them to be more town than kirroha, especially because she first jumped on Percy first, after I made my "Diescumdie" post, before jumping to me. If she were so suspicious of that, as she claims in her attacks on me when she votes, why did she vote Percy first, and then only once it became "acceptable" to jump on my wagon did she make her attack against me?
And the whole "Diescumdie" thing? I just like saying it, it makes the post seem heavier, and therefore it would (hopefully) garner more reactions. "Go wagon go" is also a favorite of mine. I knew it was a risky plan going into it, but it does do so much for the town. Look at all the discussion that's come out of it.
I disagree, except under light of a potential mafia doctor. Due to that possibility (and strictly that possibility), I think shooting herself is a bad idea.semioldguy wrote:I don't think kirroha (or her replacement) should shoot herself.
@Sotty: You have a point against farkin. After I gain a chance to reread him, I may switch my vote since the gambler actually made sense in his last post (to someone else, not necessarily farkin. But I do think that his deflection with a loaded question accusation was false).
Side note: I know that IAAUN vote weird. If it wasn't the reactions wouldn't have been helpful, now would it? Also, I will never pressure vote anyone beyond L-4 unless there is a legitimate case and I want a claim. As for reactions: I mix this kind of vote in with serious and randomly admit it to be a reaction depending on if I think it is relevant information.
@_Over9000: I really don't like you. You seem awfully scummy to me at the moment. And I know you have "reasons," but we are playing a game where the bad guys lie.
I like CJMiller less and less. <---Side Note.
Kirr <---Shouldn't be lynched. Mafia will definitely take care of the Vig/SK because both are very dangerous to them. Therefore, I feel no reason to worry about Kirr yet. Still, more thought on this is needed before we dedicate ourselves to any particular move.
