Okay well at this point it would seem as if it was SO CLEAR to everybody but yourself, so sorry you didn't understand it.White Castle wrote:How were we supposed to know that 58, 60, and 67 is what you were referring to in Post 90? Post 90 doesn't name names and there were other votes between 67 and 90 along with earlier votes you didn't comment on.
It was not "SO clear" as you contend in post 199.
If 90 was meant as a vague summary of 58, 60, and 67 then what purpose did it serve other than to add to your post count?
Further, I went back and looked at the votes you mention. Jazzmyn clearly stated the reasons for voting and unvoting. Adam Smith tacked on the third Lowell vote and gave just as much reason as Netlava, whose second Lowell vote you didn't have a problem with. Why Adam Smith but not Netlava?
I agree that millar's vote was scummy to the point I voted for him.
Netlava wrote:My theory is that scum would feel weird playing with more scumpartners than usual and would be more apt to make such a comment.
Vote: Lowell
Adam Smith wrote:Unvote: White Castle
Vote: Lowell
If White Castle is right, awesome. If not, I'm keeping my eye on him--something seems weird about him quoting the wiki all the time, like he's searching for ways to cover his ass.
I disagree with Tarhalindur's specific "Well, That Sucks Tell" as written in his wiki, actually, but I agree with your take on Lowell's odd post. Why would anyone who signed up for a specific set up in a specific game then feel the need to whine about it in their opening post unless they were scum trying to post something - anything - that they think makes them look sympathetic to the town?Jazzmyn wrote:OMGUS aside, this reminds me of something I read here:
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php ... dard_Tells
At the bottom of the page is the "Well, That Sucks" Tell.
You signed up for this game knowing the ratio of town to scum, and that it was nightless.
unvote, vote Lowell
I think you may very well have caught scum on Day 1, page 2 here.
Regards,
Jazz[/quote]
millar13 wrote:Vote: Lowell
Netlava's vote to me looked as if it was a joke vote and I think it is. The way it's phrased with the "my theory" makes it sound as if he is kidding, still the random voting period remember?Wall-E wrote:Unvote: Vote Lowell
yay
But Adam Smith and Jazzmyn's votes do not look random at all, they gave reason (albeit very poor ones- which is why I pointed them out). Especially Jazzmyn's with that little "I think you may have caught scum here" comment. And then there's millar's vote.
You're making it seem like I attacked them hardcore or something when all I really did was make some small observations, I think your arguments against it are pretty silly White Castle.