Benmage:
Please answer my question to you in [182].
Benmage [192] wrote:It doesn't seem like a mafia advantageous thing to do. (Even if mafia had a one-shot investigative move)
You can’t see any advantage to mafia if a mafia fakeclaims cop?
Kieraen:
Kieraem [189] wrote:<snip>
I'm liking the sound of my gambit (and the sound of my own voice). I'm going to role with this one and
unvote, vote Caboose
Also if we have a doc, he can play 50 50 on protecting Lowell or Plum. Keep the mafia guessing. Hopefully mafia and doc pick same and both will be alive for us to continue our investigations tomorrow (assuming neither is mafia).
If you think Caboose is mafia, then why do you think the doctor should be considering protecting Plum?
Caboose:
I *really* don’t like how you are responding to questions without answering what’s being asked.
Caboose [183] wrote:Emp wrote:KoC wasn’t asking why you claimed an innocent on Plum. He was asking why you claimed the 1-shot detail. Which I still want to know.
Because leaving out that detail would be lying. Not sure why I wouldn't claim that detail as it's pretty important.
<snip>
Not my question. Why did you claim at all?
(And, explain why that detail is so important to claim. Because to me, either the mafia don’t know about its significance detail, in which case why would you want to blurt it out. Or the mafia do know about it, in which case it means nothing. Except that you are reallyreally eager to be the first to claim and reallyreally insistent that it makes you innocent.)
Caboose [cont] wrote:I don't understand this. Do I need to be "figuring out who is guilty" in
every
post? My first post was a quick post just for everyone's info.
Please tell me the name of one person who has "found mafia" today so far.
The point isn’t finding mafia. It’s *trying* to find mafia, versus simply trying not be lynched.
Caboose [cont] wrote:Roleclaiming and clearing someone else isn't a scumtell. Also, defending yourself isn't a scumtell either.
<snip>
You’re not being accused of defending yourself, but of defending yourself when you weren’t being attacked.
Why not, instead of blithely declaring that your behavior is not a scumtell, you say what might be a scumtell in others’ behavior?
Caboose wrote:<snip>
Where's the huge hole? I must be missing it.
Um, the conveniently unused ability last night? Which conveniently requires a presumably 1-shot doctor to use up their ability tonight?
Caboose wrote:And this doesn't have anything to do with it being one-shot.
This is ridiculous and I’m *this* close to switching my vote to you. Considering how aghast and high-minded you got about oh-I-*had*-to-claim-cop-and-not-only-that-1-shot-cop-because-anything-less-than-that-would-be-a-lie when you declared Plum innocent, why are you being so incomplete and so dodgy in refusing to provide reasoning when you declare Lowell innocent?
dejkha:
For the second day in a row, you are being awfully non-contributive…