Open 121: Two of Four (b9) - Over! before 752

sekinj · Post Post #425 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:28 am

SensFan wrote:
sekinj wrote:i just want to be sure of a majority, simple as that.
You think it would be scummy to hammer without the input of everyone on the wagon?

Yes! 100% yes!

hewitt · Post Post #426 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:29 am

Uh I think it's pretty obvious that zazier has not taken a passive side-line position, that statement was a little stupid.

sekinj · Post Post #427 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:32 am

you're not doign yourself any favor hewitt.

zaz had said nothing new for almost a week... I call that not taking a stand.

hewitt · Post Post #428 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:32 am

And I also think it's interesting that the person who has their vote on you and quite clearly explained their vote on you and you turn around and call them a passive side-liner.

hewitt · Post Post #429 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:34 am

sekinj wrote:you're not doign yourself any favor hewitt.

zaz had said nothing new for almost a week... I call that not taking a stand.

What favor am I not doing myself? I don't have to worry about being lynched and having it game over for my team. If I get lynched my townmates will continue on without me and if I am lynched then hopefully that would help that find scum so don't tell me I'm not doing myself a favor when if you're town I'm doing you a helluva good favor.

sekinj · Post Post #430 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:36 am

hewitt wrote:And I also think it's interesting that the person who has their vote on you and quite clearly explained their vote on you and you turn around and call them a passive side-liner
in regards to hewitt
.

there I fixed it to make it accurate.

hewitt · Post Post #431 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:40 am

sekinj wrote:you're not doign yourself any favor hewitt.

zaz had said nothing new for almost a week... I call that not taking a stand.

By nothing new do you mean she's had the same stance on the issue for the week? Because I've had my same stances this whole game and would that make me a passive side-liner?

And don't fucking change my quotes around.

sekinj · Post Post #432 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:43 am

then dont' fucking mis-rep me

sekinj · Post Post #433 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:46 am

hewitt wrote:By nothing new do you mean she's had the same stance on the issue for the week? Because I've had my same stances this whole game and would that make me a passive side-liner?

having the same stance the whole game or any length of time does not a passive side-liner make. but sitting by during a weeklong hash of whether or not someoen deserves a hammer, saying nothing and just relying on everyone knowing that you meant what you said last saturday... is passive side-lining. How is it that you are the day's lynch and she hasn't mentioned you for a week?

hewitt · Post Post #434 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:51 am

Okay well thank you for clearing that up I was asking you if that's what you meant and it wasn't so I understand what you meant now.

hewitt · Post Post #435 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:52 am

And yeah I may be the D2 lynch right now but there's still 5 days until D2 is over.

hewitt · Post Post #436 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:05 am

Empking wrote:
Unvote

Vote: Hewitt

Hewitt's last posts have been unbeleivably scummy.

Sekinj: If they're just here to follow grudges or mess around (Hohum and Hewitt) then maybe. If they're trying to scum hunt then hell no.

Empking wrote:I think you're scummy.

I can only remember your last AtE and the "i'm town" claim.

Empking wrote:That's because we the majority of the players want Hewitt lynched.

Empking wrote:You seem a bit worried about getting votes.

Empking wrote:Why do you think KMD changed his mind?

I would just like to point out that Empking has added pretty much nothing of substance to the bandwagon on me and has added pretty much no original thought. These are all his posts since voting for me, I'm just pointing out that I would be such a convenient bandwagon for him if he was scum.

SensFan · Post Post #437 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:17 am

sekinj wrote:
SensFan wrote:
sekinj wrote:i just want to be sure of a majority, simple as that.
You think it would be scummy to hammer without the input of everyone on the wagon?
Yes! 100% yes!

Then why the FUCK have you never so much as MENTIONED my quick hammer?

FoS: sekinj

for massive inconsistencies, showing that he's more concerned with looking out for his own skin than looking for what he considers scummy.

hewitt · Post Post #438 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:49 am

Because you hammered scum of course. If sekinj honesty 100% believed that I was scum then I think she would've hammered a long time ago.

SensFan · Post Post #439 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:47 am

hewitt wrote:Because you hammered scum of course. If sekinj honesty 100% believed that I was scum then I think she would've hammered a long time ago.

Next time let her answer for her fucking self.

sek, the question remains.

sekinj · Post Post #440 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:54 am

@sens - while I believe a quick hammer is absolutely scummy, it doesn't absolutely make you scum. Plus, of course outcome of getting scum kind of clears up that situation. it's unlikely you would quickhammer your own buddy. and hewitt is correct, I'm not 100% on him, he is just my top suspect. that is another reason I'm not going to be talked into a hammer by you or emp, no one has done anything yet to outway my doubts on hewitt enough to hammer this long before deadline. while your quickhammer yesterday turned out okay, I'm not going to run the same risk.

SensFan · Post Post #441 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:02 pm

Damnit, hewitt. That was just dumb. Not even scummy, just dumb.

veerus · Post Post #442 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:53 pm

Vote Count XVIII:

Kmd4390 (0):
Primate (0):
hewitt (3): SensFan, Kmd4390, Empking
Empking (0):
sekinj (1): ZazieR
SensFan (1): hewitt
ZazieR (0):

Not voting (2): Primate, sekinj

With 7 alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch

Deadline: March 25, 2008, 2100 CST

hewitt · Post Post #443 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:11 pm

My reply was totally sarcastic and it doesn't even make sense for her to agree with what I said considering she was 100% deadset on voting for me and now all of the sudden she's turned around and is delaying it. I was actually kind of insulting her by saying the only reason she didn't jump on your back is because you hammered scum and that's an inconsistency in her playstyle because did it not seem like she was going to hammer me?

Whatever though, I wasn't answering for her. I don't even get why she agreed with what I was saying.

ZazieR · Post Post #444 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:36 pm

I said that you gave me the impression of not having read this game. And nothing you've done so far convinces me of otherwise. And you might have noticed now that I was asking my top 2 suspicions their opinion of DCJ. However, one is refusing to answer and the other chooses to pick both sides of DCJ being scummy or not. Besides, like I have said in this game, his defence of coming from a different place was NOT valid. But you never gave a response to that.

Anyway, you saying that I should make a case why I disagree with the hammer, I've given that at the start of this day. After Sens 'asked' my opinion about hewitt's play day 2, I've also given my opinion of his play day 2.
Besides, I rather attack the players who I see as scummy, like you.
Also, you still haven't responded to two of my points at post 406 which you can respond to:

Zazie wrote:Using an attack against Hewitt he can't give a defence against as she's not giving the games she's gotten the meta from.
And meta reasons.

I so agree with post 417.
And post 424 is BS. I have taken a stand regarding hewitt.

sekinj wrote:How is it that you are the day's lynch and she hasn't mentioned you for a week?

Should I? IF (girl, you're way to confident in this) hewitt is indeed the lynch, then we'll have more days to look at if he isn't scum. I'm not convinced that hewitt is scum, so I'm already questioning those players of whom I believe could be scum for later days. If I'm not convinced in a case, I look at cases that can convince me and if they aren't there, I'll start them.

I like post 437.
But hewitt, never answer/respond to a question before the player who has to answer/respond to it, has done so. You have seen now what could happen if you don't do this.

Sekinj wrote:@sens - while I believe a quick hammer is absolutely scummy, it doesn't absolutely make you scum. Plus, of course outcome of getting scum kind of clears up that situation. it's unlikely you would quickhammer your own buddy. and hewitt is correct, I'm not 100% on him, he is just my top suspect. that is another reason I'm not going to be talked into a hammer by you or emp, no one has done anything yet to outway my doubts on hewitt enough to hammer this long before deadline. while your quickhammer yesterday turned out okay, I'm not going to run the same risk.

Sekinj wrote:i am very ready to hammer

Sekinj wrote:I think you are scum because you are being overdramatic in your reactions regarding dcj, and zwet. I cannot find meta to support your play in this game, and in fact the meta I do see is in direct contradiction. (no link because of ongoing games).

Both of the above quotes were made 18 March (my time). What a quick change in opinion...

More votes on her please.

As on a sidenote, just in case Sekinj missed it:
Sekinj, I demand that you give the titles of the games you've gotten hewitt's meta from.

SensFan · Post Post #445 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:29 am

ZazieR wrote:Sekinj, I demand that you give the titles of the games you've gotten hewitt's meta from.

He claimed they were ongoing, if I recall. He

CANNOT

name them, if that's the case.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #446 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:05 am

Unvote

I'm back. I see a deadline coming up. I see Hewitt at L-1. I'm not ready to lynch as I've missed some things. Not sure if he's claimed already.

I'll catch up when I can. Tonight at the earliest.

SensFan · Post Post #447 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:08 am

Kmd4390 wrote:
Unvote

I'm back. I see a deadline coming up. I see Hewitt at L-1. I'm not ready to lynch as I've missed some things. Not sure if he's claimed already.

I'll catch up when I can. Tonight at the earliest.

He claimed Townie.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #448 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:12 am

SensFan wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:
Unvote

I'm back. I see a deadline coming up. I see Hewitt at L-1. I'm not ready to lynch as I've missed some things. Not sure if he's claimed already.

I'll catch up when I can. Tonight at the earliest.
He claimed Townie.

Then I will probably revote when I catch up. Remind me why he was scummy.

SensFan · Post Post #449 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:31 am

Kmd4390 wrote:
SensFan wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:
Unvote

I'm back. I see a deadline coming up. I see Hewitt at L-1. I'm not ready to lynch as I've missed some things. Not sure if he's claimed already.

I'll catch up when I can. Tonight at the earliest.
He claimed Townie.
Then I will probably revote when I catch up. Remind me why he was scummy.

Hmmmm...a quick summation:

*Bitched about the zwets wagon for far longer than is normal
*Accusing ME personally of having 'caused the death of two town' (meaning him and zwets, even know zwets wasn't lynched and he's not dead or confirmed Town)
*Admitted that he 'knew DCJ was Scum' before the hammer
*Ridiculous Appeal to Emotion