Open 125: JK9 (Over) before 761

[zwetschenwasser]

HAEL NAU!

[ThAdmiral]

You do really want policy lynches.

I said 2 people were policy lynches, which they are. Emp, at the very least, is and just because he posts, that doesn't make him better than Grimmy. That's not the same as "only wanting policy lynches" as you agreed with.

You really have only talked about policy lynches.

I have a question for you as well: what happens if you are paired up with empking in a game, either as scum or as masons?

[dejkha]

I'm not sure. I've been in a bunch of games with him but none of which I've been aware of what role he was while he was alive. I'd probably still push for his lynch because he wouldn't be able to help me other than being a distraction and people give him the BoDT because of how unreadable he is. So if he didn't get lynched it wouldn't be all bad. And I'd still want to be consistent, so I'd probably act the same. Many people no how fed up I am with him so they'd notice if I gave him a break.

[dejkha]

EBWOP: BoTD

[zwetschenwasser]

So now you claim to be forced to get mad at Empking every game?

[dejkha]

I never claimed that. In fact, if anything I claimed that I don't force it since I've never known his role while he was alive. And I said if I did, I'd still push for his lynch for the same reasons I do now. Nice way to play with my words, Zwet.

[zwetschenwasser]

Many people no how fed up I am with him so they'd notice if I gave him a break.

Hm... I wonder what this means.

[dejkha]

I'd probably still push for his lynch because he wouldn't be able to help me

Hm... I wonder what this means.

[zwetschenwasser]

It's trying to fix your Freudian slip.

[dejkha]

I can't intentionally fix a Freudian slip in the same post. But guess what? It's not even a slip. And it looks like you are seriously reaching by picking

this game

to attack me for how I act toward Emp. Whether or not I am acting consistent because we were both scum, it wouldn't matter because you wouldn't be able to tell.

FoS: Zwet

[hewitt]

Okay that seems a little OMGUS to me dejkha.

[dejkha]

How so? My point was perfectly valid.

[hewitt]

He's not even attacking you for going after Empking he's pointing out that you had some interesting choices of wording that seem a little suspicious.

[dejkha]

I don't think so. He tried to make a hypothetical seem suspicious is this game alone. The chances of me and Emp being scum together are no more likely than any other game and he happens to call it a Freudian slip this time when, in reality, it's just as insignificant a clue as it ever was. I find that scummy.

[hewitt]

You did point out that if you were scum together you'd act the same towards him so technically in this game you're equally as likely as being scum as Empking is. Empking is so consistently ambiguous it's tough to tell whether he's scum or town and you would act the same towards Empking whether you're scum or town as well.

So you're just as likely scum as Empking is...

[dejkha]

We're all just as likely to be scum as he his, but the chances of us both being scum in the same game, and in this game no less, are incredible low.

Basically my answer to the hypothetical has no effect on how scummy I appear. And for anyone that thinks so, I FoS you.

[dejkha]

So you're just as likely scum as Empking is...

And I'll say 'no' to this statement actually. People are able to get a read on me. Granted most of the time it's wrong, but still, I'm not a wild card. How I react to him doesn't effect how I act towards others, so I'd still be able to give away tells.

The only way anything you're both saying is true is if we're both scum in this game and I find it interesting that you're only considering it because Admiral brought it up. I also find it interesting that you're both choosing this game to try and make it believable, when he made no mention of it.

[Shinnen_no_Me]

But still, we won't be able to read you when it's about Emp. And due to the possibility of him being D1 or D2 lynch (yes, I still think he should be lynched early or he will only bring problems to the town in the endgame), I think that's quite important.

[TDC]

dej&hewitt: How many games have you played together so far. Have you ever been scum together?

But still, we won't be able to read you when it's about Emp.

Whom do you feel able to read when it's about Emp?

I don't see where the supposed "slip" is.

[hewitt]

I've played one game with dejkha before I think and no we were not scum together.

[dejkha]

But still, we won't be able to read you when it's about Emp. And due to the possibility of him being D1 or D2 lynch (yes, I still think he should be lynched early or he will only bring problems to the town in the endgame), I think that's quite important.

You don't need to read me. I said both ways I'm likely to push for his lynch. Even still, when it comes to Emp, everything is almost always the same: his reactions to everyone else and everyone else's reactions to him.

Hewitt's correct. We've played one game and we weren't scum together.

[Empking]

You don't need to read me.

This is very telling.

[dejkha]

EBWOP: "You don't need to read me when it comes to Emp".

The following sentences imply that's what I meant, but I'm just clearing it up.

[Shinnen_no_Me]

I don't think the following sentences implied that. Hmmm...

[Empking]

I don't think the following sentences implied that. Hmmm...

PRUFT