Open 118 - Follow The Cop ... Or Not (Game Over) before 748

[Slicey]

Why does everyone need to repeat what I already said? SK posted his reason for voting you and ZazieR probably doesn't even know she's voting for you.

[Shinnen_no_Me]

SK's reasons are baseless!

[Slicey]

He said he was voting for you because you said he wanted to go back to the RVS, which is not true.

[Shinnen_no_Me]

And you think that's a good reason to vote? Specially when someone is close to lynch?

[Tuberkulos]

@ the 5 people voting for Shin now; have you read the above post I made about ac1983fan? Do you agree with my logic? Do you still prefer Shin to ac1983fan?
- do you still prefer a Shin lynch to an ac1983 lynch?

I read it. I agree. I would prefer a Shin lynch.

I'm willing to lynch ac. However, no matter the outcome, it doesn't change my view on Shin.

How come no one has acknowledged this post?

Maybe they thought it was bullshit? I acknowledge that I've read your post.

unvote

[Empking]

Now please answer my question about the genuineness of your curiosity.

Because the one above it wasn't genuine.

That's what I thought at first, too.

Is that why you didn't answer it?

Yes. As I've already said. Didn't you see me say that? I can't believe you really missed my answer. You must be lying.
.

Your answer in the other posts was that the question was "ridiculous" now its changed and you're calling me the liar. That's rich.

I'd prefer a Shin lynch to an Ac lynch.

[GIEFF]

OK, I think it's clear Shin will be the lynch today. Our deadline is stlil a moving target, so I don't think she has to claim yet. If Shin is still target #1 when our replacement shows up, then I think a claim will be in order.
-----

Empking, I don't think you're a liar. That was sarcasm to demonstrate that is can be easy to miss a post, even when it's NOT buried in a giant quote pyramid.


"Not genuine" and "ridiculous" are not mutually exclusive.

[Empking's Alt]

OK, I think it's clear Shin will be the lynch today. Our deadline is stlil a moving target, so I don't think she has to claim yet. If Shin is still target #1 when our replacement shows up, then I think a claim will be in order.
-----

Empking, I don't think you're a liar. That was sarcasm to demonstrate that is can be easy to miss a post, even when it's NOT buried in a giant quote pyramid.


"Not genuine" and "ridiculous" are not mutually exclusive.

I didn't miss the post.

They don't need to be mutually exclusive, they just have to be different.

[GIEFF]

Your question was ridiculous, so I assumed it wasn't genuine (i.e. you weren't interested in the answer).


I said both in my answer.

I don't think you actually think I am being inconsistent, as I very clearly am not.

[Empking's Alt]

This is your answer, bold where it mentions being genuine.

Because it was a ridiculous question. Of course it isn't easier to read 1-inch-wide posts. Your eyes have to move back and forth a bunch, and you have to scroll way down to read everything.

[GIEFF]

Can you answer it seriously?

No.

As in you're physically unable to or in that you're scum trying to devoid the town from information?

As in

I don't think you are genuinely curious in the answer

, and are trying to distract the town with 4 days to deadline. But because me refusing to answer will just make you ask more questions, then here it is:

Because it was a ridiculous question. Of course it isn't easier to read 1-inch-wide posts. Your eyes have to move back and forth a bunch, and you have to scroll way down to read everything.

It's much easier to understand when you don't rip it out of context to try to make me look inconsistent, especially about something so trivial as why I chose not to answer a ridiculous question.

If you aren't genuinely interested in the answer to a question, then don't ask it. It is distracting, anti-town, accomplishes nothing, wastes space, and makes re-reads more difficult, especially when you follow it up with 5 more questions designed to try to get me to fall into some kind of trap.

[Empking]

Note to the other players: The part GIEFF bolded is answering a completely different question.

[GIEFF]

It is the same question. You asked me why I didn't answer your question. Both answers describe why I didn't answer it. This is ridiculously nitpicky, and you're not even correct. Do you think it is scummy to not answer a ridiculous question? Do you think it's scummy to say the question is both ridiculous and not genuine?

If so, really?

If not, drop it.

[Empking]

Strawman.

The bit he quoted answered this question:

As in you're physically unable to or in that you're scum trying to devoid the town from information?

The question he changed his reasoning on was this:

Why didn't you answer it the first time?

[GIEFF]

Why didn't you answer it the first time?

Because I am mafia, trying to dodge your airtight biting questions against me about whether I prefer reading 1-inch posts.

Can you answer it seriously?

No.

As in you're physically unable to or in that you're scum trying to devoid the town from information?

IT WAS THE SAME QUESTION. The underlined question, which you claim is different from the bolded one, is clearly referring to it. You are just stripping the context away so it looks like a different question.

A townie would not be trying so hard to misrepresent the past, especially about something that would be trivial even if it were true. This is pointless and distracting, just like 80% of your posts in the thread.

unvote

Vote Empking

And you didn't answer my question:

Do you think it is scummy to not answer a ridiculous question? Do you think it's scummy to say the question is both ridiculous and not genuine?

[GIEFF]

I will not discuss this further unless another player thinks I need to. It should be crystal clear that I was perfectly consistent. I think Empking knows this, so I won't answer any more of his fake questions to stop cluttering the thread.

[Empking]

It is related to it, sort of, but they're different questions.

I think GIEFF is suspicious so he votes me. Wow.

I didn't answer them because they're strawmen.

[GIEFF]

I voted you because you are misrepresenting the past so horribly that I assume it is not accidental.

[Empking]

You think

As in you're physically unable to or in that you're scum trying to devoid the town from information?

is exactly the same as

Why didn't you answer it the first time?

?

[GIEFF]

I will not discuss this further unless another player thinks I need to.

[Empking]

I voted you because you are misrepresenting the past so horribly that I assume it is not accidental.

LAL?

[Kmd4390]

I will not discuss this further unless another player thinks I need to.

Couldn't hurt.

[Slicey]

I voted you because you are misrepresenting the past so horribly that I assume it is not accidental.

LAL?

He isn't lying. >_> You asked a really stupid question, he didn't take it serious, thus why he didn't answer it the first time. Or at least, that's what I'm getting from his posts. The questions are very similar and both are really pointless.

[Empking]

I voted you because you are misrepresenting the past so horribly that I assume it is not accidental.

LAL?

He isn't lying. >_> You asked a really stupid question, he didn't take it serious, thus why he didn't answer it the first time. Or at least, that's what I'm getting from his posts. The questions are very similar and both are really pointless.

Read the quote before my post.

[GIEFF]

I disagree, KMD - I think it does hurt, as it's distracting. But I will hold true to my word, and respond:

You think

As in you're physically unable to or in that you're scum trying to devoid the town from information?

is exactly the same as

Why didn't you answer it the first time?

?

Yes, they are the same question. They are both asking about why I am not answering your question about if I like reading 1-inch-wide posts.

• Why didn't you answer it the first time?
  
• Why won't you answer it seriously?

I gave two reasons I did not answer your question. And even if I had just given one reason, BOTH applied. And now, for the third time, do you think what I did was scummy? And if not, why do you continue to bring it up?


-------

And no, it is not "LAL." You deliberately misrepresented the past.

• Possible town motivation: You are testing my reactions, or those of a potential scum-buddy.
  
  
• Possible scum motivation: You are trying to make me look scummy even though you don't think I'm scum in order to get me lynched later, or to discredit my defense of Shin in order to get Shin lynched today. A yownie would address my defense directly and try to get at the TRUTH, not make indirect leading questions to kmd and try to fabricate super-minor inconsistencies in my past play.

I think the second is a lot more likely than the first, and so I voted you.