ac1938fan wrote: GIEFF wrote:ac1983fan wrote:
In other news, shin, are you planning on claiming any time soon? Because we're getting really close to deadline, and if you want to live, that's pretty much your only possibility.
Another possibility is just lynching you instead.
Deadline's in four days, many of the people voting shin have had opportunities to change their votes, but have not done so.
I'd call
this post my main case against you, ac1983fan.
Zazier, Slicey, Tuber, Shadow Knight, and Empking are currently voting for Shin.
- Zazier has not had a chance to see or respond to that post.
- Slicey made two posts telling you why following is bad, and hasn't said anything since.
- Tuber has posted since I made that post, but hasn't responded to or acknowledged it.
- Shadow Knight has not posted since I made that post.
- Empking has not responded to or acknowledged it.
@ the 5 people voting for Shin now; have you read the above post I made about ac1983fan? Do you agree with my logic? Do you still prefer Shin to ac1983fan?
- do you still prefer a Shin lynch to an ac1983 lynch?
I agree with ac that we need to decide this very soon so we can get a claim soon enough before the deadline to react to it. I think that whoever has the most votes tomorrow should claim. So please respond quickly.
-----------
Kmd4390 wrote:GIEFF wrote:You are claiming that Shin is lying when she says she didn't see Empking's post.
I am? Prove it.
Kmd4390 wrote:Shinnen_no_Me wrote:I didn't read Emp's "case" because I simply did not see it. Is that scummy?
I think you should have read it.
It looks to me like you are implying Shin really did read it. If you are not, why else would you say Shin should have read it? Am I misunderstanding your intent?
Kmd4390 wrote:GIEFF wrote:And I think it's scummy to claim (read: LIE) that your quote pyramid was intended to "limit confusion." That is what you're claiming, right? That is just about objectively false. You were quoting because it was funny.
Misrep. I quote to limit confusion. That is any time I post and there are quotes. It limits confusion to include posts. Being lazy and not removing things isn't what I am referring to when I say I'm limiting confusion. It's quoting in general.
This is ironic, because you are taking it out of its original context, the very thing you claim you are trying to avoid. You said you quote to limit confusion in response to Shin saying the quote pyramid was difficult to read. I took that to mean that you were arguing against this, saying that the quoting made the conversation EASIER to follow, and that this was your intent, when your intent was very obviously nothing of the sort.
No, you didn't come out and say "My quote pyramid was intended to help the town follow the conversation." But you very much implied it, and it is very much untrue.
And if you weren't trying to imply that the quote pyramid was intended to help the town follow the conversation, why would you make a general argument about quoting helping to provide context?