Open 121: Two of Four (b9) - Over! before 752

[Kmd4390]

The one I quoted is pretty terrible AtE.

[Empking]

This probably sums up his terrible play best, if I can only pick one:

OK, folks. Stop it. Now. I'm playing this game, it's only on Page 3, and there haven't been actions or anything important. Why are you saying all this random load of bullcrap when you don't even know anything yet?

Thank You

[SensFan]

The one I quoted is pretty terrible AtE.

I know, but I said all his posts were terrible, and Emp made me pick one.

[Darkcoffeejazz]

Sens is right. I was asking you why you felt the need to point it out that there are three players with two votes each. I also was wondering which emotion you had with it. If you were happy, surprised or sad about this. But I didn't think of funny. It's also not the impression I get when I read your post that you saw it as funny.


I haven't played with Zwet before, so I don't know what you guys are talking about. But I have seen Sens behaving like this before. So Zwet, you can better not keep this in your mind as it won't work:

I would be if you would stop trying to find fault in everything I'm saying and actually play the game instead of randomly insulting me.

Wow, people on MafiaScum are ten times more serious then the people I'm used to playing with.

I find odd things like three players with 2 votes each on them funny. My post pointing it out? I felt no need to point it out. In fact, it was just a random post. I have a very odd sense of humor, and I often voice out my thoughts. The "emotion" I felt with that post was nothing more than me being calm and noticing something I found odd, yet funny.
I wasn't really paying attention to everyone else's vote patterns until the tally, basically.
That is all it was. Nothing more.

I thought this was kinda ironic since I random voted BlodeSoWut and then Darkcoffeejazz voted her after I did which put her at 2 votes and

is then surprised when there are players with 2 votes this early in the game.

I did say I was leaning towards voting them anyway, but I was gonna wait on it. Also, yer wrong about the bolded part. I was never surprised, and even if I was, it was not about players having two votes on them early in the game. It was that three players at the same time had 2 votes before the first vote tally.

Also, I'm finding I agree that Zwet's posts aren't actually contributing at all, but I don't think he's voteworthy. Heck, I don't find anyone all that suspicious yet, unless Militant and Zazier count for pointing out a post that proved highly irrelevant in the end. But I'm reserving judgement on that one because they don't know how I play.

[veerus]

Vote Count III

Kmd4390 (1): ZazieR
BlodeSoWut (2): militant, Darkcoffeejazz
Seamus2008 (0)
Empking (1): zwetschenwasser
militant (0)
SensFan (0)
zwetschenwasser (3): SensFan, Empking, Kmd4390
Darkcoffeejazz (0)
ZazieR (1): BlodeSoWut

Not voting: Seamus2008

5 votes to lynch

It appears Seamus2008 has not yet posted, despite confirming. He shall be prodded now.

[zwetschenwasser]

SensFan is overreacting, and KMD is hopping on easily with the general opinion.

[Kmd4390]

SensFan is overreacting, and KMD is hopping on easily with the general opinion.

Is this the only game where I've gone after you for being useless?

[Kmd4390]

SensFan is overreacting, and KMD is hopping on easily with the general opinion.

Is this the only game where I've gone after you for being useless?

Yes or No will do. Don't talk about any specific ongoing games because you are in so many that I am. If you want to reference a game, make sure it is completed.

[Darkcoffeejazz]

I think everyone but Seamus has voted.

We'll get nowhere the way the votes are, so I suppose I'll

Unvote, Vote: Zwet

.

After all, we have to lynch someone.

[Empking]

DCJ: Do you want Zwet to claim? Do you want him to be lynched?

[ZazieR]

I'm not always serious... I can name three (four if one hadn't left this site) players who can support this statement. It just depends on the situation.

I don't see how it was odd as it happens all the time. And that's why it's strange that you pointed it out. As I have never seen anyone do that. This is my reason for questioning your intention of it.

But anyway, what's the meaning behind this:

Also, I'm finding I agree that Zwet's posts aren't actually contributing at all, but I don't think he's voteworthy.

We'll get nowhere the way the votes are, so I suppose I'll Unvote, Vote: Zwet.

Why the switch?

We'll get nowhere the way the votes are, so I suppose I'll Unvote, Vote: Zwet.

After all, we have to lynch someone.

And the best part of your last post, voting for a lynch just to get things moving.

Unvote Vote Darkcoffeejazz

[Kmd4390]

I'm not always serious... I can name three (four if one hadn't left this site)

players who can support this statement.

It just depends on the situation.

I can support it.

I think everyone but Seamus has voted.

We'll get nowhere the way the votes are, so I suppose I'll

Unvote, Vote: Zwet

.

After all, we have to lynch someone.

Reasons for voting?

[ZazieR]

I knew you would figure it out that you are one of those 4

[Kmd4390]

I knew you would figure it out that you are one of those 4

Well.....yeah.

[SensFan]

SensFan is overreacting, and KMD is hopping on easily with the general opinion.

Explain why I'm overreacting. Better yet, start playing.

[zwetschenwasser]

You're majorly pissing me off, Sens. Stop. KMD, no it isn't, and I'd like to hear a response from Dark about his contradiction.

[SensFan]

You're majorly pissing me off, Sens. Stop. KMD, no it isn't, and I'd like to hear a response from Dark about his contradiction.

I asked you a direct question that allowed you to start playing, and explain why you think I'm overreacting. You chose to ignore it.

Why isn't zwet lynched yet?

[zwetschenwasser]

Getting furious for jokeposting on page 2=overreacting.

[SensFan]

Getting furious for jokeposting on page 2=overreacting.

You are REFUSING TO PLAY. Why should I sit back and let you make 20 posts of absolute useless bullshit, when you should be hunting for Scum?

[zwetschenwasser]

I am not refusing to play. I'm trying to play, but you just keep saying I'm not playing when I have to sift through your walls of bullshit looking for something useful.

[Darkcoffeejazz]

You're majorly pissing me off, Sens. Stop. KMD, no it isn't, and I'd like to hear a response from Dark about his contradiction.

It's quite simple, really. There is no contradiction.
I can say I don't think yer voteworthy, but I also don't wanna listen to you arguing and such. Besides, we learn nothing if we lynch no one. If you are not mafia, then, from my point of view, it might be the ones who are abso-posi-lutely pushing for your lynch. As in, those who started the bandwagon to begin with.

Not to mention, you two are pissing me off with yer childish arguing. You are not contributing at all when yer arguing like this.
Also, the fact you haven't contributed at all that I can see is still anti-town. Though I may not like voting for you, I'm doing it so we're not stuck on Day 1 forever, like the other game I'm in.

(seriously, MafiaScum should look into shorter days, like only a 48 hour time limit like I'm used to).

Also, Zazier, jumping the gun a bit, methinks. I don't see any real reason to vote me, to be honest. Seeing as there's no "contradiction" I can see with what I've said so far.
It's called a "random" vote for a reason.

[Empking]

You're majorly pissing me off, Sens. Stop. KMD, no it isn't, and I'd like to hear a response from Dark about his contradiction.

It's quite simple, really. There is no contradiction.
I can say I don't think yer voteworthy, but I also don't wanna listen to you arguing and such. Besides, we learn nothing if we lynch no one. If you are not mafia, then, from my point of view, it might be the ones who are abso-posi-lutely pushing for your lynch. As in, those who started the bandwagon to begin with.

Not to mention, you two are pissing me off with yer childish arguing. You are not contributing at all when yer arguing like this.
Also, the fact you haven't contributed at all that I can see is still anti-town. Though I may not like voting for you, I'm doing it so we're not stuck on Day 1 forever, like the other game I'm in.

(seriously, MafiaScum should look into shorter days, like only a 48 hour time limit like I'm used to).

Also, Zazier, jumping the gun a bit, methinks. I don't see any real reason to vote me, to be honest. Seeing as there's no "contradiction" I can see with what I've said so far.
It's called a "random" vote for a reason.

Why didn't you answer my questons.

Unvote

Vote: Dark

[militant]

This probably sums up his terrible play best, if I can only pick one:

OK, folks. Stop it. Now. I'm playing this game, it's only on Page 3, and there haven't been actions or anything important. Why are you saying all this random load of bullcrap when you don't even know anything yet?

Thank You

Why did you require Sens do select a post?

Also, I'm finding I agree that Zwet's posts aren't actually contributing at all, but I don't think he's voteworthy.

We'll get nowhere the way the votes are, so I suppose I'll

Unvote, Vote: Zwet

.

After all, we have to lynch someone.

I find this a little bit odd, you don't think Zwet is vote worthy and then suddenly you want to lynch Zwet to get somewhere. I don't think there is any chance that we will no lynch at this stage in the game; it's no as if we are under a deadline an have to vote to lynch to get information. Weird that you feel the need lynch somebody to get information on page four.

DCJ: Do you want Zwet to claim? Do you want him to be lynched?

It's quite simple, really. There is no contradiction.
I can say I don't think yer voteworthy, but I also don't wanna listen to you arguing and such. Besides, we learn nothing if we lynch no one. If you are not mafia, then, from my point of view, it might be the ones who are abso-posi-lutely pushing for your lynch. As in, those who started the bandwagon to begin with.

Not to mention, you two are pissing me off with yer childish arguing. You are not contributing at all when yer arguing like this.
Also, the fact you haven't contributed at all that I can see is still anti-town. Though I may not like voting for you, I'm doing it so we're not stuck on Day 1 forever, like the other game I'm in.

(seriously, MafiaScum should look into shorter days, like only a 48 hour time limit like I'm used to).

Also, Zazier, jumping the gun a bit, methinks. I don't see any real reason to vote me, to be honest. Seeing as there's no "contradiction" I can see with what I've said so far.
It's called a "random" vote for a reason.

This post was pretty useless. All you said was there is no contradiction when there blatantly is. You said somebody is not vote worthy and then vote them which makes them worthy of your vote. You also did not answer Empking's questions that I would also like to know the answers to.

Also, you are a big fan of bandwagons aren't you?

Fist you added a second first to BlondeSoWut and now you put Zwet and L-1 on page four. You seem awful eager to reach night for some reason.
Why is that?

Why isn't zwet lynched yet?

Seeing as Zwet is now at L-1, do you think a claim is required?

Unvote

. I usually get rid of my random vote once I start discussing things

[Empking]

This probably sums up his terrible play best, if I can only pick one:

OK, folks. Stop it. Now. I'm playing this game, it's only on Page 3, and there haven't been actions or anything important. Why are you saying all this random load of bullcrap when you don't even know anything yet?

Thank You

Why did you require Sens do select a post?

I wanted to get a better read on what Sens thinks.

[zwetschenwasser]

I'm your cop, idiots.