I'm finding it awfully tempting to vote for Zwet, but when I really think about it, I'm not sure if my vote is better placed on him or Nuwen.
They are my top suspects though.
Let's start with Zwet.
349: Aha, Spring is scum. Nice to know that can be argued without any kind of a case, and based only on the NK.
351: Claims JereIC's town flip incriminates Spring. Oh yeah, also COMPLETELY agrees with Nuwen... huh?
353: Fluff
355: I posted that Spring was scum before Nuwen!
358: Direct quote in bold.
I thought it was clear from yesterday's spring/jere debate that jere's alignment would point towards spring's scum/towniness.
I would like Zwet to explain how that statement carries merit. It's based off the assumption that apparently only scum are critical of/attack townies.
364: Points out BB's reluctance to the Zero wagon. I'm sensing that someone likes pointing fingers so that we don't notice who pushed Zero's wagon so hard, antagonizing him the whole way.
366, 368: Demonstrates either an inability to read, or an inability to pay attention to what was said.
371: Votes Spring after being asked why he didn't vote in the face of such certainty. Points out his relative disinterest in the Spring case on day 1, but says he did notice the arguments against her, and finds the night 1 evidence incriminating. Hmmm...
Now Nuwen.
350: "Zero's wagon was virtually useless" stinks of scum gloating to me. Argues the JereIC wagon as a reason for voting Spring... and also a fascinating theory about my exchange with her being designed to distract from her attempted wagoning of JereIC. I say fascinating, because I thought the point of my disagreement with her was to DRAW attention to what she was doing.
356: WIFOM argument. I hate these. I see the point of it... but I'm very reluctant to buy/act/play based on it. I see it being a far more beneficial strategy for Spring to simply kill someone else if she's scum.
357: Direct quote in bold
Yeah, that's why Ecto and I don't like it. We realize that you've been pursuing spring since yesterday, but you didn't point out how Jere and Zero's alignment confirmed spring's alignment to you. I have the reasons I stated, but they're less definitive - care to share yours?
When playing mafia, it's a good idea to assume others players cannot read minds.
I am VERY confused by this post, because I haven't seen any posts prior to post 357, back to the beginning of the day where Nuwen states any concern for Zwet's suspicion of Spring.
361, 362: Backtracks on me being Spring's most likely scum buddy.
365: Grills Zwet on his presumption of Spring being scum. What about YOURS?
367: Fascinating. I smell a scum bus.
369: More scent to possible bussing. Nuwen asks where Zwet's vote is... which is a fair question. (Zwet does vote soon after I believe.)
378: D'OH! Re-read indicates that Spring doesn't look suspicious to Nuwen after all. The transformation is complete, now the entirety of the suspicion can be focused on Zwet. One thing here... what stopped you from doing a re-read BEFORE voting for Spring? Just curious.
Not ready to vote yet, and I don't really see any hurry to.
I want to see Zwet's response to the case and votes against him, and am also interested to see Nuwen's reaction to me... and I'm interested in seeing more of how Zwet and Nuwen react to each other as well.
For now.
FOS: Zwet and Nuwen
From here, I'll probably have another look at day 1, and see if there's anything there that can shed more light on what's going on now.