@ Atronach, I'd say Don overestimates the significance of his earlier exchange (edit: actually, he seems to do that with IP's vote too, not commenting much on other players or exchanges even though he has contributed reasonably. Hmm.) leading to the lylo comment. Planning lynches is bad, but planning your own lynch is stupid and really a nulltell. Your accusations of desperation seem to be reaching.
@ canadianbovine re: "Aren't scum usually on the first bandwagon?" Idiot scum might jump at the first bandwagon, yes, but you could also interpret your comment as slightly cleverer scum trying to show yourself as townie by not doing so. And asking questions is digging yourself into a hole now? Don't like that post. General statements possibly implying alignments without specifics or arguments. (Nb. I might be reading into one post too much here.)
@ insanepenguin02 re: #112, did you forget which game we're playing? Holding back analysis on who is scum (not to trust) because you don't trust people? WTF, I call BS. And re: #114 Lol, obvWIFOM and poor attempt at deflecting suspicion. What I said earlier defending you? Consider that retracted! (Currently undecided on whether to vote just on the basis of those two posts, will give you one post to explain these comments.)
@ Megatheory, re various parts of #120: when first reading the initial exchange between you and Don I got the feeling that you were being more aggressive in arguing, while Don was more responsive to everything you said. That, and a few specific things you said I disagreed with, was why I suspected you of deliberately exaggerating the argument. Since that point Don turned more aggressive towards you (and now IP) though.
Oh come on, my first three questions in #34 were obviously rhetorical.
I'd call Don more at fault for the initial exchange because Don was the one to self vote. So, yeah.