Ok. Suprisingly enough my final read did not provide any iron-clad, perfectly wrapped evidence of scumness.
All I have is inference. But I think Im as confident as Im going to get at this point without anyone making an obvious error.
Inhim says in post 256 that ke is scum because:
- i am unlikely to be scum because of my bingle with locus (agree with this obviously)
- locus never commented on kieron's play but some minor corrections on day 1
- (to a lesser extent) enigmas posting "oddities" in posts 165 and 167.
As to the second point. Locus commented even less on inhim's play than kieron's. Inhim if you are innocent this was not a good example. It seems to me like you were trying to call attention away from that fact. By your own logic here this aspect makes you more scummy than ke. That this seems to be the most obvious "mistake" you have made is a credit to your play.
As to the third point, ive looked again at enigma's posts. They are just not ringing any scummy bells to me. Polite play from a replacement who doesnt want to antagonise anyone yes. A little bit hesitant yes. Scummy no.
So that leaves us with the first point only which doesnt help at all in determining which one of you is scum.
Added to the above enigma seems to have reasonable justification for lurking this game. If he was incidentally scum at the same time well then ive erred.
For the reasons stated:
Vote Inhimishallbe
I took it as another sign that enigma was innocent! Guess I have quite a bit to learn 
