In post 3189, Bellaphant wrote:
I wouldn't have just ploughed into Titus 5 times if I was scum? I would have either no killed for confusion or, I'd have picked off top trs knowing that Titus was jailing the lhf, (until sky. Wtf was that).
well no killing is just the same as targeting titus with less upside, right? but i guess it doesn't seem impossible that the scums in fact did not plough into titus five times just difficult to consider that to be particularly likely (though certainly more likely now that titus was successfully nightkilled)
In post 3189, Bellaphant wrote:
Tbf, playing the 'if I was scum ' game is boring because, and I know you have zero reason to trust me on this, I 100% would've conceded by now. In fact the only thing that was my 5% doubt on sky was I felt she was the kind of person that would keep going.
i do trust you on this in a vacuum; like were that the situation in a hypothetical game we were talking about, sure
it's just that in this game specifically i can think of potential motivators for you not to do so, and i am not you and therefore have no way of actually weighing the impact those motivators would have on you beyond 'possible reason not to concede'
it's also arguable that targeting titus repeatedly is a semi-concession with upside, right,
like i am conceding or! i am suddenly in a somewhat favourable position
i mostly like the 'were i a scums' game because i am fully scumbrained regardless of alignment unfortunately
(which can be helpful as town at times but getting myself out of possibility space and into
but are these things ACTUALLY alignment indicative
can be very difficult)
In post 3189, Bellaphant wrote:
Regarding the 'could set up new trs because we only need two elims', I get you, but I feel like the shift around would be more obvious? In the coalition game I just played, this did become obvious at the end of the penultimate day bit I missed it
i mean, dannflor on a very clear path there from the initial statement of you/projectry, right
