that thought process makes a lot more sense to me, especially saying that italiano felt like generic agreement in order to pocketIn post 297, Asri Teroka wrote: This one has little time for semantics. Basically, agreeing with generic points or using them as the basis for a townread can be sheeping. Black felt more analytic. Italiano was a headnodder.
If Ausuka is town and Italiano scum it is sheeping of generic points to pocket.
Your assertion is flawed in its dualistic exclusionism. Agreement with generic statements is still agreement, this one never said it is alignment indicative but the fact of the matter is it happened.
Furthermore, just because a statement is generic does not mean that it is valid. The underlying issue here is the cook wagon yet you exclude this fact to focus only on whether it is valid for this one to note patterns that might lead to readforming.
This one is curious why you are saying this at all. While you don't feel scummy this is a sidetrack.
i was asking about it bc it didn't make sense to me and i wanted to see if it was a real thought you had with internal consistency or if it was you looking for easy reasons to shade people without critically thinking about them
it now feels more like a real thought to me so ty for clarifying. semantics matter, this is a game of words