Mizzy - 1 (q21)
Fuzzyman - 1 (Mizzy)
Simpor - 1 (Ether)
Mister Lolipedo-kun
Simpor
Patrick
Green Crayons
corporate
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch!
She got two kinds of response.Ether wrote:Doubt he's going to.
In other news, no one's commented on my Simpor vote.
This is a throw away one liner. It looks to me like he just put it in there to give the impression that he's being cooperative.Mister Lolipedo-kun wrote:@Ether: I don't have an opinion on the Simpor vote. I'm not sure about your complaints. I'm not entirely sure that all I've been doing is agreeing with you. My problem with his views on me is that he said that I'm contributing a lot. I haven't said anything for several pages. I'm not sure what you mean by fear-mongering though.
I don't get a scum read on corporate. I think he's just being an ass.
Who seemed to genuinely try to answer her question.Green Crayons wrote:Your main point, as much as I can tell from simply skimming the thread, is that Simpor asked Wolf to clarify her point that she thought you had a power role. Did I miss anything else?Ether wrote:In other news, no one's commented on my Simpor vote.
While scummish, I don't find it worthy of a vote compared to Mizzy, corp or - if I was to just look at people who were throwing out guesses as to who has power roles - wolf herself.
Seriously. WTF. Are you calling shenanigans on yourself, cos it certainly did look like you were back-pedalling. Especially since your unvote didn't offer any reason why your opinion of ether changed.corporate wrote:You call backpedaling? well, i call shenanigans!
Is that a "meh, maybe it's just your playstyle" or a "meh, you didPost 209, Crywolf wrote:I think it's just your way of speaking. It always seems to me pushing to mold the town into your ways of thinking.
I'm not sure what you mean. I took a look at the thread and tried to come up with a reasonable opinion on the Simpor vote. Care to explain?q21 wrote:This is a throw away one liner. It looks to me like he just put it in there to give the impression that he's being cooperative.Mister Lolipedo-kun wrote:@Ether: I don't have an opinion on the Simpor vote. I'm not sure about your complaints. I'm not entirely sure that all I've been doing is agreeing with you. My problem with his views on me is that he said that I'm contributing a lot. I haven't said anything for several pages. I'm not sure what you mean by fear-mongering though.
I don't get a scum read on corporate. I think he's just being an ass.
What is there to comment? No one else have picked up Ethers opinion.corporate wrote: i started well? what about all the stuff thats going on up there about you? and you bring me back into this? i think everyone already knows im an ass, captain obvious. what about you?
Not all questions are pro-town. It is not a responsibility as a townie to vocally seek out power roles.
While scummish, I don't find it worthy of a vote compared to Mizzy, corp or - if I was to just look at people who were throwing out guesses as to who has power roles - wolf herself.
She asked a question in a rude way, I made a rude response. Simple as that.And I really hate the fear-mongering generalization you put into your defense.
Ok, I have you high up on my scum list, so you are voting for me...And pretty much all Ped's done is agree with me, and I'm tied for highest on your list. So yeah.
That was a very helpful comment...corporate wrote: polly want a cracker?
And this is her answerDo you believe that Ether has a power role? And by the way, Ether did ask you who you suspected in post 65 and we are now up in 135. Do you have any suspicions now?
No one else was making a comment against her post so I asked wolf to see what kind of reaction I would get, she pretty much ignored my question and I didn't ask again.I think Ether’s trying to get complete control of the town, and I’m not about ready to just hand it over, which makes me pretty suspicious.
Fun note about his "questions" overreaction. Searching his posts for question marks, here are the questions he's asked since his original analysis:Post 207, Ether wrote:It was Simpor's response that led me to vote him.First off, I dislike the juxtaposition between "How dare you ask me about Ped?" and "I like questions." Second, that's a strawman fallacy, combined with false warnings of doom to push his point home. Yes, asking certain types of questions is necessary, butPost 162, Simpor wrote: I could ask you, why the hell do you care what I like about Ped?
I believe that it is a responsibility as a townie to ask questions, if we didn't do that, the scum would win every time.hisquestion was extremely unnecessary.
I don't think Crywolf has ever fished for my role. The "power roles deserve more authority during the day" sentiment is idiotic, but I think I've seen it before. Don't remember specific examples to cite, but it rings a bell.
Defensive. Still the closest thing to a proper question out of the four.Post 162, Simpor wrote:I could ask you, why the hell do you care what I like about Ped?
Hypothetical.Post 237, Simpor wrote:And scum, well, should a townie act like this in a game?
Valid as a point, but technically a hypothetical question.Post 240, Simpor wrote:What is there to comment? No one else have picked up Ethers opinion.
Just defending himself. ("Defensive" has connotations I'll avoid in this instance.)Post 243, Simpor wrote:Where have I done that? Post a quote!Post 242, Mizzy wrote:I have to say that criminalizing the people who have points against you is not a valid defense