so for now
Grimmy
will post reasons next time (tomorrow/weds)
Anything for my second-favorite meerkat.Rishi wrote: Thanks for letting us know that you're going to continue to not participate in this game. Thanksgiving was a week away when you posted this.
The mod had it down as seven votes required for a lynch when it should have been six since 11 people are alive. I PM-ed him about it, and he corrected the mistake. That's why it was L-1.iamausername, in his 724, wrote:By my count, Rishi was only at L-2 before that unvote, but whatever.
I was not trying to point out the significance ofFlask of Pestilence wrote:@Kison: I'm confused by your read of Elmo. Why does the way your predecessor and forbiddanlight went after him make you think he's town? You concluded that you think forbiddanlight is town, and I'm assuming you're not claiming scum here... so yeah, can you elaborate on that please?
Flask of Pestilence wrote:Also, what's the deal with your Gunsmith ability? You voted Rishi to place him at L-1, Tarhalindur mentioned that in order to investigate someone, he had to vote the person and then submit an investigation choice, but I haven't seen you take the steps necessary to get an investigation off today. So, uhm, are you lying about your role or not?
Again, I have been in the game for a grand total of 5 days, andFlask of Pestilence wrote:Tarhalindur mentioned that in order to investigate someone, he had to vote the person and then submit an investigation choice, but I haven't seen you take the steps necessary to get an investigation off today.
That's not my assumption at all. I'm just saying that for someone who supposedly has this role of "Gunsmith who Day-Investigates people after placing a vote on them", it seemed offly quick of you to lay your vote down on Rishi. I would think that someone who has this role that's extremely sensitive to voting would be more careful with his or her votes. I realize you're claiming now that you didn't realize that your vote placed him at L-1, but I don't see why you needed to place it there to begin with even if you were just using your vote to try and assert where you stand at this current time. Also, Patrick pointed out in his 719 that Rishi had reached L-1, but you only unvoted exactly two minutes after I called for someone to unvote. It just sounds kinda sketch.Kison, in his 733, wrote:Again, I have been in the game for a grand total of 5 days, andjustcaught up a day and a half ago. Are you under the assumption that I should be rushing, here? I have not conclusively decided who I will investigate. When I decide, I will 'take the steps necessary' to make it happen.
Unless I am voting for someone, in which case I'll be forced to investigate the person I am voting so long as I get it in during twilight. Are we rushing to lynch Rishi?Camn wrote:But if we lynch Rishi.. will it be too late for you?
I can understand how you might find me placing Rishi at L-1 to be sketchy. The only explanation I can give is that I was very focused on reading the game, catching up, and showing where I stood, and that I was tired by the time I was finished and only skimmed the last few pages. I mentioned this in my first post, and yes, I realize this is a lousy explanation. However, beyond that, I can't really argue this.Flask of Pestilence wrote:I'm just saying that for someone who supposedly has this role of "Gunsmith who Day-Investigates people after placing a vote on them", it seemed offly quick of you to lay your vote down on Rishi. I would think that someone who has this role that's extremely sensitive to voting would be more careful with his or her votes. I realize you're claiming now that you didn't realize that your vote placed him at L-1
I view this as good practice. Of course there is noFlask of Pestilence wrote:but I don't see why you needed to place it there to begin with even if you were just using your vote to try and assert where you stand at this current time.
Regarding 712, since Rishi is so sparse, and to get this game rolling again...I shall give my thoughts.Knight of Cydonia wrote:This.andersonw wrote:Rishi, could you respond to KoC's post 712?
But but but... I like it when you think about me.camn wrote:Kison: Place a couple random votes on people so I can stop thinking about this!
Okay, I'll respond to this. First of all, I will concede that you did not ask all power roles to claim, but all protective roles. There is a difference. But, even though you say that the purpose of claims was to verify Fark's claim, that's not what you said. You specifically asked for all protective roles to claim, not for a counterclaim.Knight of Cydonia wrote:Because there was no night kill? We already have a RB claim against you from fark, and I wanted to see if we were going to get a counter-claim - if we had, I'd have probably been more wary of Fark, but as it is, you're already No. 1 on my scum-list.
And I didn't choose to ignore the issue, as you put it - I just ceased asking for a claim. And I didn't ask for all power-roles to claim - I said:which was essentially asking for any counter-claim/claimed block of Fark. So thanks for trying to misrep me in order to save your own skin - as if I needed more reasons to string up scum.I think that, if we have any other protective roles, we need them to come out now - that's the only way we can build on Fark's claimed block of Rishi.
Lovely.Knight of Cydonia wrote:ALL CYLONS, CLAIM MAKE AND MODEL NOW. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL BE INTERPRETED AS A MAJOR SCUMTELL.
THIS.camn wrote:@KoC
a) How does this lessen Fark's claim? Fark could easily have RB'ed Rishi-town OR Rishi-scum with OR without a Doc.
b) Does Doc claiming ensure Doc death? Almost always.
c) is his death worth YOUR peace of mind re: Fark??
Please.. answer these questions.
Now normally, if KoC hadn't really proven himself YESTERDAY, I would also be suspecting him because of rolefishing. So Rishi is totally in the right to call out KoC on it, because it is bad play.
Hey, I'm the one who is supposed to be flirting with camn. Except I was scum in our last game and she still hasn't forgiven me. Right now I'm just giving her some space.Kison wrote:camn wrote: Kison: Place a couple random votes on people so I can stop thinking about this!
But but but... I like it when you think about me.
And once again, KoC, you pick up on a relatively minor part of the argument against you and ignore the rest.Knight of Cydonia wrote:Again, Rishi, you're interpreting my requests for specific claims/counter-claims as requests for mass claims. Asking Cylons to claim make and model would have helped me work on who to target my ability. As it is, I didn't get that info, but I got lucky on ML.