Corporate wrote:i think it looks like you got a few random votes on you and now it looks like a good time for you to play victim and point fingers.
This is a ridiculous accusation. Only two suspicions from me are based on the L-3 bandwagon, and I pointed out several times that they weren't scummy enough to warrant a vote. Yes, I am pointing more fingers than I can type with, but only a small percentage of them are actually related to those "few random votes on me". I suspect you for back-tracking, buddying up to Gamma, and flip-flopping with your vote. I suspect Jersey for reaching in a situation totally irrelevant to the bandwagon. And if you didn't notice, other people are playing more "victim" and "pointing fingers" more than I have. Because of this it looks like you're trying to make my case seem insignificant, claiming that it is driven purely by "victim's OMGUS."
Corporate wrote:yes i think he did, but i think people also know how flip floppy d1 votes can be. especially in the early pages
You just proved my point. 1) Apparently you do not think that a fourth vote on a player on Page 1 does not warrant a FoS, random vote, or any word of disapproval at all, which is absurd. 2) If you think that Page 1 votes are very flip floppy, wouldn't Gamma's L-3 put me in more danger than you have claimed?
Oh, and by the way that isn't a viable defense. You can't justify your swing in opinion by saying "D1 votes are flip floppy," unless you can back up this claim or show me why you would do this.
Corporate wrote:but i can not see how you would take me serious for me to hold a vote on someone who may or may not have read half of page one.
May or may not? Budja clearly said that he didn't read when he voted, and you made this pretty clear in #23. You are outright lying here and I am considering switching my vote to you. As for over-analyzing, I am reading what you say. There was zero indication to your vote being random/a joke while several circumstances point to it being serious. When you see me pull something out of my bum like "omg corporate is trying to quicklynch Budja!!!" based on two posts, then you can fairly say that I am over-analyzing. But that is not the case here.