DrippingGoofball -
tubby216 -
DoomCow -
dahill1 -
CoheedCambria09 -
Korts -
Not voting: MafiaSSK, farside22
With 15 alive, it will take 8 to lynch. The deadline for day 1 will be Saturday, December 6.
no, it's that I think you're voting for dahill based off of a false premise. What about dahill makes you think he's a better place for your vote than tubby?DrippingGoofball wrote:What, you think there's only one scum in this game?hasdgfas wrote:and yet you're voting for dahill even though he made perfectly clear that you were one of his suspects. Why?
Yes. DoomCow hasn't done anything in terms of moving the game forward. He'll come in and say something, but not give much reasoning behind it. First off, there was the vote for tubby saying that he "didn't like the last post of his". He's not really saying anything there. Voting Vi for the obviously fake PR is also bad, especially ditching it quickly and going right back to tubby.dahill1 wrote:has, do you think you're vote on DoomCow is well placed at the moment, and if so, why?
fair enough. didn't even see that last point you made so thanks for putting that out therehasdgfas wrote:Yes. DoomCow hasn't done anything in terms of moving the game forward. He'll come in and say something, but not give much reasoning behind it. First off, there was the vote for tubby saying that he "didn't like the last post of his". He's not really saying anything there. Voting Vi for the obviously fake PR is also bad, especially ditching it quickly and going right back to tubby.
Also note the end of post 179, where he says there's nothing to analyze on Day 1. I'd like to hear an explanation for that. There is no pro-town reason I can think of that can explain why posting some analysis on Day 1 is bad.
Actually, I'm saying there that I think that post (the vote for crazy defending Tubby) is giving me an anti-town vibe. That plus the suspicion he allready had was enough for me to vote (and keep voting for now) him.Hasdfgas wrote:First off, there was the vote for tubby saying that he "didn't like the last post of his". He's not really saying anything there.
I've defended myself enough from this. fake pr is lying to town and thus anti town. No matter what reasoning it might be. The vote switch back was because Vi admitted to having a fake pr in post 51. Still not liking it, but willing to go with it for now.hasdfgas wrote:Voting Vi for the obviously fake PR is also bad, especially ditching it quickly and going right back to tubby.
I'm not saying that posting analysis on day 1 is bad, I'm just saying I won't do any analysis on day 1. Since I like some reference to go by.hasdfgas wrote: Also note the end of post 179, where he says there's nothing to analyze on Day 1. I'd like to hear an explanation for that. There is no pro-town reason I can think of that can explain why posting some analysis on Day 1 is bad.
I abstain from posting untill farside rereads.farside22 wrote:Hi all. I took the day off to catch up on sleep. Just letting you know I didn't forget about you.
A) This is a postanimorpherv1 wrote:I abstain from posting untill farside rereads.farside22 wrote:Hi all. I took the day off to catch up on sleep. Just letting you know I didn't forget about you.
MafiaSSK wrote:I seriously did. Not a newb tell this time.SpyreX wrote:A bad newb move that the only recourse is negative for the town is a bad newb scum move still.
MafiaSSK wrote:Looks like Tubby's the main suspcious person. Will get working on a PBPA of him.
? If it has to do with gut, just quote this post.
CoheedCambria09 wrote:Zaz, I didn;t really have a reason for voting, thats why in the post that held the tubby vote it said something along the lines of, so to be chaotic. I voted on the person with the largest bandwagon. Pretty much it. I have to pay more attention to this game and then more posts will be coming.
is it scummy though?DoomCow wrote:I've defended myself enough from this. fake pr is lying to town and thus anti town. No matter what reasoning it might be. The vote switch back was because Vi admitted to having a fake pr in post 51. Still not liking it, but willing to go with it for now.hasdfgas wrote:Voting Vi for the obviously fake PR is also bad, especially ditching it quickly and going right back to tubby.
what do you mean by this? wouldn't a Day 1 analysis give you even better of a reference?DoomCow wrote:I'm not saying that posting analysis on day 1 is bad, I'm just saying I won't do any analysis on day 1. Since I like some reference to go by.
why? also you haven't been posting that much anyway and this seems like an excuse to not post even more.animorpherv1 wrote:I abstain from posting untill farside rereads.farside22 wrote:Hi all. I took the day off to catch up on sleep. Just letting you know I didn't forget about you.
Korts 363 wrote:Whoa. and since when have you been contributing more than farside?animorpherv1 wrote:I abstain from posting untill farside rereads.farside22 wrote:Hi all. I took the day off to catch up on sleep. Just letting you know I didn't forget about you.
thisdahill1 367 wrote:gaaah..so many scummy people in this game!!
You set your sights too low. I always want to be an unlimited dayvigdahill1 367 wrote:i wish i was like a quadruple voter!
I didn't even know you were in the game.animorpherv1 wrote:I abstain from posting untill farside rereads.farside22 wrote:Hi all. I took the day off to catch up on sleep. Just letting you know I didn't forget about you.