what does that mean exactly? xDRaging Rabbit wrote:Vote BMfor backing off a selfvote.
BM
what does that mean exactly? xDRaging Rabbit wrote:Vote BMfor backing off a selfvote.
I'm pretty sure you're town at this point. But that doesnt mean i won't ring the police if i catch you abusing midgets.curiouskarmadog wrote:Ah, BM, you make me giggle inside, of course, so does midget porn.
Lol, i dont think that is a reason against self-voting in the early stages. It is just as likely (in fact, moreso) to promote discussion than voting for an individual. Yeh the self-vote was a mistake, but the premise is kinda the same. It's a vote which doesnt affiliate me to anyone directly, but indirectly is far more useful than a random vote.Raging Rabbit wrote:Voting yourself is kinda like saying "screw useless random votes, I'll start with voting myself for kicks and giggles." Then several joke posts after you switch to obsessive random voting. Doesn't mean much because the self-vote was apparantly a mistake and this being you an' all, but then again you did cry for Twito.
I am pretty sure he meant to vote no lynch..I will vouch for that much...if you question why I quick meta will answer your questionRaging Rabbit wrote:Voting yourself is kinda like saying "screw useless random votes, I'll start with voting myself for kicks and giggles." Then several joke posts after you switch to obsessive random voting. Doesn't mean much because the self-vote was apparantly a mistake and this being you an' all, but then again you did cry for Twito.
*points at the rules*curiouskarmadog wrote:I am pretty sure he meant to vote no lynch..I will vouch for that much...if you question why I quick meta will answer your questionRaging Rabbit wrote:Voting yourself is kinda like saying "screw useless random votes, I'll start with voting myself for kicks and giggles." Then several joke posts after you switch to obsessive random voting. Doesn't mean much because the self-vote was apparantly a mistake and this being you an' all, but then again you did cry for Twito.
lol How's this?Korts wrote:unvote, vote: BM
For two consecutive posts without a vote. Shame on you.
What do you mean?Korts wrote:How solid a read do you have at this point?Battle Mage wrote:I'm pretty sure you're town at this point.curiouskarmadog wrote:Ah, BM, you make me giggle inside, of course, so does midget porn.
I appreciate the thought. Maybe save it for when it's absolutely necessary?curiouskarmadog wrote:Adel is a stickler for this if I remember right..sorry mod.Battle Mage wrote:
*points at the rules*
since I wasnt talking about a particular game (mostly just pointing in a general direction) i dont think she will mind..but will let it drop anyway (just in case)...
Doesn't yield the same sort of information, and from my experience the discussion it creates revolves strictly around theory and meta and doesn't have much to do with the game. I'm not letting this deteriorate into a Twito discussion, you can keep crying your eyes out as far as I'm concerned. Also, you're buddying up to midgets.Battle Mage wrote:Lol, i dont think that is a reason against self-voting in the early stages. It is just as likely (in fact, moreso) to promote discussion than voting for an individual. Yeh the self-vote was a mistake, but the premise is kinda the same. It's a vote which doesnt affiliate me to anyone directly, but indirectly is far more useful than a random vote.Raging Rabbit wrote:Voting yourself is kinda like saying "screw useless random votes, I'll start with voting myself for kicks and giggles." Then several joke posts after you switch to obsessive random voting. Doesn't mean much because the self-vote was apparantly a mistake and this being you an' all, but then again you did cry for Twito.
Twito was a legend. Face facts.
BM
I'd consider your experience limited then. Obviously it derives from game theory, but anything that encourages people to take sides, is invaluable at this stage in a game.Raging Rabbit wrote:Doesn't yield the same sort of information, and from my experience the discussion it creates revolves strictly around theory and meta and doesn't have much to do with the game.Battle Mage wrote:Lol, i dont think that is a reason against self-voting in the early stages. It is just as likely (in fact, moreso) to promote discussion than voting for an individual. Yeh the self-vote was a mistake, but the premise is kinda the same. It's a vote which doesnt affiliate me to anyone directly, but indirectly is far more useful than a random vote.Raging Rabbit wrote:Voting yourself is kinda like saying "screw useless random votes, I'll start with voting myself for kicks and giggles." Then several joke posts after you switch to obsessive random voting. Doesn't mean much because the self-vote was apparantly a mistake and this being you an' all, but then again you did cry for Twito.
Twito was a legend. Face facts.
BM
That isnt conclusive unless somebody claims midget, and/or you can prove that midgets are scum.RR wrote:Also, you're buddying up to midgets.
Twito Rules!RR wrote:I'm not letting this deteriorate into a Twito discussion, you can keep crying your eyes out as far as I'm concerned.
You know what, never mind.Battle Mage wrote:What do you mean?Korts wrote:How solid a read do you have at this point?Battle Mage wrote:I'm pretty sure you're town at this point.curiouskarmadog wrote:Ah, BM, you make me giggle inside, of course, so does midget porn.
Lolwut? Midgets are obvious pro-town.BM wrote:That isnt conclusive unless somebody claims midget, and/or you can prove that midgets are scum.
right... :SKorts wrote:You know what, never mind.Battle Mage wrote:What do you mean?Korts wrote:How solid a read do you have at this point?Battle Mage wrote:I'm pretty sure you're town at this point.curiouskarmadog wrote:Ah, BM, you make me giggle inside, of course, so does midget porn.
So how is defending them more scummy than abusing them?Korts wrote:Lolwut? Midgets are obvious pro-town.BM wrote:That isnt conclusive unless somebody claims midget, and/or you can prove that midgets are scum.
Can't have that!Korts wrote:I just realized I was potentially rolefishing.BM wrote:right... :S
I believe it was CKD.Korts wrote:Who's talking about abusing them?BM wrote:So how is defending them more scummy than abusing them?
Good catch, but I'm already voting for his buddy, Kison.Korts wrote:unvote, vote: BM
For two consecutive posts without a vote. Shame on you.
Damn. Well, at least you'll never find out who my other buddy is!DrippingGoofball wrote:Good catch, but I'm already voting for his buddy, Kison.Korts wrote:unvote, vote: BM
For two consecutive posts without a vote. Shame on you.
roflcopter wrote:empirical evidence shows that if korts and i are in the same game, he is always scum
vote korts
who's twito? [/worthless newb]
Liar, Kison was bus'ing Guardian.Battle Mage wrote:*cough*Sensfan*cough*
BM