Mini 680: Portlandia- Game Over!

ZazieR · Post Post #550 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:18 am

I investigated xtoxm.
My result was: guilty.

Vote xtoxm

Farkshinsoup · Post Post #551 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:22 am

I'm pretty sure I'll be voting for Xtoxm, but I want to hear G-force's results first. We're in no hurry here, so let's take our time and do this right.

Xtoxm · Post Post #552 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:03 am

I find Fark contradicting himself there amusing.

Knight of Cydonia · Post Post #553 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:49 am

I find your OMGUS and random, wildd accusations amusing.

icemanE · Post Post #554 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:18 am

*sigh*

Sanities are not confirmed. I don't know if I can trust the guilty. We'll see what the other cop has to offer.

X · Post Post #555 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:26 am

Well, I suspect both ZazieR and Xtoxm, and I wouldn't be too surprised with her either bussing or pulling Lepton's Gambit. It's difficult to decipher. ZazieR, why are you so entirely sure that you're sane?

Xtoxm · Post Post #556 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:28 am

Whatever. Just lynch me. I'm not going to put any more effort into this game.

icemanE · Post Post #557 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:34 am

Xtoxm · Post Post #558 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:37 am

Xtoxm wrote:Whatever. Just lynch me. I'm not going to put any more effort into this game.

icemanE · Post Post #559 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:42 am

Why aren't you going to put any more effort into this game, is what I'm asking.

But then if you aren't putting in effort, I guess I shouldn't expect an answer...

Xtoxm · Post Post #560 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:46 am

*Nods*

icemanE · Post Post #561 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:47 am

This makes me think it's probably a waste of time to lynch Xtoxm right now.

q21 · Post Post #562 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:31 am

bah... go town!

*awaits 21 gun salute*

G-Force · Post Post #563 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:34 pm

I also investigated Xtoxm, and I also got a guilty result. I think two guilties makes it more likely that the result is accurate, but I'm going to do a re-read on Xtoxm before I vote.

bionicchop2 · Post Post #564 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:00 pm

OK, here are our possibilities:

paranoid:paranoid - inconclusive

paranoid:insane - Xtoxm is town

paranoid:sane - Xtoxm is scum

sane:sane - Xtoxm is scum

insane:insane - Xtoxm is town

fake:paranoid - inconclusive

fake:insane - Xtoxm is town

fake:sane - Xtoxm is scum

fake:fake - inconclusive

Statistically, the results give us nothing concrete today with equal possibilities of scum and town. For information, a xtoxm lynch gives us the most. If we lynch wrong today, we likely enter tomorrow with 8 town and 3 scum. If we lynch wrong on Xtoxm, we at least have an idea of the sanity of 1 cop to assist tomorrow. If we lynch wrong on somebody else, we gain no information for what could be an endgame situation.

As for game content, I need to do a closer read on xtoxm now. Most of his actions I read as null tells as they occurred

icemanE · Post Post #565 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:33 pm

I can't believe X isn't even attempting to defend against the reports. I think he's basically admitted he's scum without really saying it.

2 guilties is our best bet, clearly. Still kind of pitiful, I say, but if we have a scum,. we have a scum.

vote: Xtoxm

Xtoxm · Post Post #566 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:46 pm

Huh. Wasn't expecting them both to be guilty.

bionicchop2 · Post Post #567 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:57 pm

ice - while the reality is that xtoxm is probably a good lynch today (even if only for learning sanity), your reasoning is flawed. 2 innocent reports have the same likelihood of meaing xtoxm is scum as 2 guilty reports do.

X · Post Post #568 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:06 pm

icemanE wrote:I can't believe X isn't even attempting to defend against the reports.

Watch how you abbreviate, mister.

bionicchop2 wrote:ice - while the reality is that xtoxm is probably a good lynch today (even if only for learning sanity), your reasoning is flawed. 2 innocent reports have the same likelihood of meaing xtoxm is scum as 2 guilty reports do.

Plus, Xtoxm has thrown other scumtells and has given up trying to convince people that he's town.

Let's not end the day just yet, though. Way too early to cut off discussion, especially if we want to get more than just hyposcum Xtoxm.

Farkshinsoup · Post Post #569 (ISO) » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:02 pm

Xtoxm would be our best lynch candidate even without the investigations.

Vote:Xtoxm

Why so reluctant to talk at this point, Xtoxm? Every time you've gotten close to being lynched you've done something to try to shut down discussion (the self-vote, now the silent treatment).

Question for Zazier and G-force: why did you decide to investigate xtoxm last night?

ZazieR · Post Post #570 (ISO) » Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:20 am

X wrote:ZazieR, why are you so entirely sure that you're sane?

I'm not, but due to the way xtoxm played yesterday, I can see truth in my result. Besides, it's something that could help us catch scum.

Fark wrote:Question for Zazier and G-force: why did you decide to investigate xtoxm last night?

Because as you could have seen, I was suspecting him day 1.

icemanE · Post Post #571 (ISO) » Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:20 am

X wrote: Watch how you abbreviate, mister.

Oops. That's usually how I abbreviate Xtoxm. But of course I'll be more careful from now on.

@bio - why are two innocents just as likely to mean Xtoxm is guilty?

Mr_Adams · Post Post #572 (ISO) » Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:09 am

*Boo* I'm the ghost of Mr_Adams! just here to say "told you I was town!"

Farkshinsoup · Post Post #573 (ISO) » Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:29 am

Where's a proton pack when you need one?

bionicchop2 · Post Post #574 (ISO) » Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:33 am

icemanE wrote:@bio - why are two innocents just as likely to mean Xtoxm is guilty?

Tags fixed.

2 guilties looks like this (posted earlier):

bionicchop2 wrote: paranoid:paranoid - inconclusive

paranoid:insane - Xtoxm is town

paranoid:sane - Xtoxm is scum

sane:sane - Xtoxm is scum

insane:insane - Xtoxm is town

fake:paranoid - inconclusive

fake:insane - Xtoxm is town

fake:sane - Xtoxm is scum

fake:fake - inconclusive

2 innocents:

naive:naive - inconclusive

naive:insane - Xtoxm is scum

naive:sane - Xtoxm is town

sane:sane - Xtoxm is town

insane:insane - Xtoxm is scum

fake:naive - inconclusive

fake:insane - Xtoxm is scum

fake:sane - Xtoxm is town

fake:fake - inconclusive

Out of 9 possibilities in both cases, exactly 3 point to xtxom being conclusively scum. 3 point to him being conclusively town and 3 are inconclusive.