You can unvote and we can give you hammering privilegesIn post 1423, Taco Hemingway wrote:No one hammer. Hammerinh here early is a scumclaim
Mini Normal 2218 | FIA WRC | Endgame
-
-
Dwlee99 They/themSurvivorThey/them
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25777
- Joined: July 3, 2015
- Pronoun: They/them
- Location: Northeast USA
-
-
humaneatingmonkey Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11971
- Joined: June 7, 2017
In this scenario Taco is townIn post 1424, Dwlee99 wrote:
Why would that mean we lose? Taco is certainly evil in that scenario.In post 1422, humaneatingmonkey wrote:If Seanzie is town, we lost. There's no way we wouldn't be eliminating Taco tomorrow.-
-
Dwlee99 They/themSurvivorThey/them
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25777
- Joined: July 3, 2015
- Pronoun: They/them
- Location: Northeast USA
-
-
humaneatingmonkey Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11971
- Joined: June 7, 2017
Why? Truth be told I have applied zero elbow grease into this game and I'm only surface-level reading ISOs. It felt pointless to read the game when a cop is claiming to have a guilty on someone in non-ELo conditions and that flip hasn't happened yet. So maybe you can tell me why they can't both be town.-
-
Dwlee99 They/themSurvivorThey/them
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25777
- Joined: July 3, 2015
- Pronoun: They/them
- Location: Northeast USA
-
-
Shrek Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 962
- Joined: March 29, 2016
if taco is telling the truth he understands how i can confirm what he's saying and why he shouldn't full claim. probably shouldnt say that regardless but hes confirming himself as cop anyways.
if seanzie claimed something other than vt i would be inclined to give him benefit of the doubt, but that buildup into a straight basic claim is sus af and basically confirms what taco has said here.-
-
T3 He/himSurvivorHe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11455
- Joined: February 19, 2021
- Pronoun: He/him
- Location: Boston
So you were drunk? -_-In post 1423, Taco Hemingway wrote:No one hammer. Hammerinh here early is a scumclaim-
-
T3 He/himSurvivorHe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11455
- Joined: February 19, 2021
- Pronoun: He/him
- Location: Boston
-
-
Dwlee99 They/themSurvivorThey/them
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25777
- Joined: July 3, 2015
- Pronoun: They/them
- Location: Northeast USA
-
-
Shrek Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 962
- Joined: March 29, 2016
early hammering is a scumclaim regardless of which way seanzie flips because a scum can just use it to gain towncred for themselves by saying 'but i was the one who got him out' or something like that. at this point its pretty clear seanzie is screwed unless something major happens so a mafia bussing him and using that to end the day early to prevent spread of info, getting in a nightkill, and gaining towncred would be a very legitimate strategy-
-
T3 He/himSurvivorHe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11455
- Joined: February 19, 2021
- Pronoun: He/him
- Location: Boston
-
-
Seanzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 655
- Joined: May 29, 2021
-
-
Titus She/herMoon WalkerShe/her
- Moon Walker
- Moon Walker
- Posts: 80307
- Joined: May 3, 2013
- Pronoun: She/her
Sean, can you give last reads?ShowThe scum had the misfortune of Titus being absurdly accurate on day one.Really quite impressed by that.~Drixx
You're letting Titus win the game by herself.Good luck now I guess.You have no chance to win.~Tywin
GTKTitus Part 2
Titus Academy
VLA Friday nights until Sunday morning.
All hail the Scum Empress!-
-
ssbm_Kyouko She/HerJack of All TradesShe/Her
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7435
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Pronoun: She/Her
- Location: Middle Tennessee
I think from the interaction that seanzie seems caught for the wrong reasons. He is arguing against the guilty as though taco could have it by trying to argue why taco doesnt have it. If from seanzie's pov taco cant have a guilty on him there's no reasoning to be done. You just throw down. That's what Andres did in 2213 when I faked a guilty on him as town.In post 1406, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
This doesn't make sense. We will instantly know if Taco is faking if Seanzie flips town. Scum instantly knows right now if Taco is faking. Why would town still think he's fake if the guilty was legitimate? Why would scum still think he's fake if the guilty is legitimate?In post 1389, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I think taco shouldn't claim here though, as there is real reason to think the guilty is fake here for a lot of people. Means if he really is PR then scum may not kill him of they think he is faking. If he claims that goes out the window
If the claim is legitimate and Seanzie is scum, we move ELo to Day 4 and it would be dangerous to keep a confirmed cop past N2.
If the claim is illegitimate, then Taco is either town who's lying and
The proper move is to assure us that the claim is 100% beyond a reasonable doubt, so we don't go into a situation where Taco has a false guilty and he's town.
If seanzie is scum though, scum don't know whether tacos claim is real, and the only hope for them that seanzie doesn't die is to elim taco now and flip a role that can't have a guilty.P,Polarized!I,Intelligent!N,Never wrong!K,Kyouko!
Falco Apologist | woo Magi-
-
Seanzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 655
- Joined: May 29, 2021
Already did. I think Zyla, Taco and Shrek are the most likely wolves.In post 1437, Titus wrote:Sean, can you give last reads?
Taco definitely should go over. Zyla is probably a PR and needs to go over. Shrek is also outed unless there is actually a cop in the setup.
I'm very pissed and over this game at this point.-
-
Seanzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 655
- Joined: May 29, 2021
Uhh, what? Yes, Taco is BSing, I am trying to show the thread that Taco is BSing. Not sure how you have an issue with that.In post 1438, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:
I think from the interaction that seanzie seems caught for the wrong reasons. He is arguing against the guilty as though taco could have it by trying to argue why taco doesnt have it. If from seanzie's pov taco cant have a guilty on him there's no reasoning to be done. You just throw down. That's what Andres did in 2213 when I faked a guilty on him as town.In post 1406, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
This doesn't make sense. We will instantly know if Taco is faking if Seanzie flips town. Scum instantly knows right now if Taco is faking. Why would town still think he's fake if the guilty was legitimate? Why would scum still think he's fake if the guilty is legitimate?In post 1389, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I think taco shouldn't claim here though, as there is real reason to think the guilty is fake here for a lot of people. Means if he really is PR then scum may not kill him of they think he is faking. If he claims that goes out the window
If the claim is legitimate and Seanzie is scum, we move ELo to Day 4 and it would be dangerous to keep a confirmed cop past N2.
If the claim is illegitimate, then Taco is either town who's lying and
The proper move is to assure us that the claim is 100% beyond a reasonable doubt, so we don't go into a situation where Taco has a false guilty and he's town.
If seanzie is scum though, scum don't know whether tacos claim is real, and the only hope for them that seanzie doesn't die is to elim taco now and flip a role that can't have a guilty.
What do you mean by "throw down" here?-
-
Taco Hemingway
-
-
Seanzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 655
- Joined: May 29, 2021
-
-
Taco Hemingway
-
-
Taco Hemingway Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 782
- Joined: June 18, 2021
-
-
Taco Hemingway Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 782
- Joined: June 18, 2021
-
-
Taco Hemingway
-
-
Taco Hemingway Goon
-
-
Seanzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 655
- Joined: May 29, 2021
-
-
Taco Hemingway Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 782
- Joined: June 18, 2021
this is a certain complexity that makes me feel better about kyouko slot oddlyIn post 1438, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:
I think from the interaction that seanzie seems caught for the wrong reasons. He is arguing against the guilty as though taco could have it by trying to argue why taco doesnt have it. If from seanzie's pov taco cant have a guilty on him there's no reasoning to be done. You just throw down. That's what Andres did in 2213 when I faked a guilty on him as town.In post 1406, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
This doesn't make sense. We will instantly know if Taco is faking if Seanzie flips town. Scum instantly knows right now if Taco is faking. Why would town still think he's fake if the guilty was legitimate? Why would scum still think he's fake if the guilty is legitimate?In post 1389, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I think taco shouldn't claim here though, as there is real reason to think the guilty is fake here for a lot of people. Means if he really is PR then scum may not kill him of they think he is faking. If he claims that goes out the window
If the claim is legitimate and Seanzie is scum, we move ELo to Day 4 and it would be dangerous to keep a confirmed cop past N2.
If the claim is illegitimate, then Taco is either town who's lying and
The proper move is to assure us that the claim is 100% beyond a reasonable doubt, so we don't go into a situation where Taco has a false guilty and he's town.
If seanzie is scum though, scum don't know whether tacos claim is real, and the only hope for them that seanzie doesn't die is to elim taco now and flip a role that can't have a guilty.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-
-