Not voting: armlx, charter, hasdgfas, pwnz, wolframnhart
With 5 alive, it will take 3 to lynch. The deadline for today is Saturday, August 30 at 9:00 PM pacific.
I like to mix it up. Plus this pertains to ongoing games so I can't talk much.hasdgfas wrote:charter, is there a reason you're not being very aggressive? I've noticed that usually you're much more aggressive than you have been in this game.
Next there's a bit of discussion about his role and how to use it. It sort of parallels how crazy acted in regards to his role. He basically only popped in the thread after Empking accuses him.wolf wrote:But seriously I don't mind going with a general vote about who to use my dayvig power on, reason being I would rather kill the person everyone does a poison vote on so I am not accused of doing anything wrong.
I'm now on page 13, I'll try and finish the rest tonight, and then probably vote wolf.wolf wrote:I am fine with either keeping night actions to ourselves (keep the mafia guessing) or plan it out to see where descrepenses have taken place the next morning.
wolframnhart in 379 wrote:@ armlx
I don't really see you or ZS as scum atm.
Here you hop on after me and pwnz say we support the ZS lynch. This is my biggest reason for suspecting you as scum. You make no mention of ZS being scummy in between these two posts. You're jumping on ZS's wagon copying the justification of others. Your reasons for joining were known quite a while beforehand, but it was only after it seemed basically the entire town was in support of a ZS lynch that you go aboard. My post 512 questioned you for this as well.wolframnhart in 506 wrote:unvote
Not sure I really like the idea of lynching someone just as an insurance policy. You aren't directly attacking armlx for the whole "plan" thing, yet you do constantly bring it up in your arguments. This seems just odd enough to make it seem no so protown, only because it's not leading anywhere and yet you are still pursuing it to almost nitpickingness (spelling? lol) yourself.
vote ZS
Don't really like the suggesting to Has to vote ZS, but I don't think it's a huge scumtell.wolframnhart in 602 wrote:@Has, if you are convinced we should lynch ZS, why aren't you voting him?
You only unvoted ZS after his claim when a few other people did (myself and has and maybe someone else). Here (coupled with 622) you manage to set yourself up to look good tomorrow by being afraid that ZS is a mislynch, and cast suspicion on pwnz for his part in the wagon. Knowing that ZS is town, these couple of posts give me the impression that you knew yesterday as well.wolframnhart in 621 wrote:Was just a question. Of course after i posted it i looked back, saw that myself and Has hadn't voted, until i asked Has about his vote and he put it on ZS. Zs is now at L-1, but I just feel like there is something I am missing because I don't want to end this day on a possible mislynch.