I'd like to vote for both bird1111 and Monika for getting us into this mess, but since I can't do that...
OMGUS
No wait...
OMGUS
And geez, I actually thought someone named Bobbins died...
Well, for any one individual person, assuming the other 11 people vote for someone randomly, and no one votes for him/herself, the chance of someone getting 3 or more votes is 20311670611/285311670611, or roughly 7%. I won't be bothered to the casework for the total group, but that's not too low.StrangerCoug wrote:It's me personally, but imagine throwing twelve 12-sided dice. The odds of getting three or more of the same number isn't very high as far as I know (but then again, I may have to refresh my memory about probability—I previewed my post with a dice string set to throw twelve 12-sided dice and got three ones and three twos).ChannelDelibird wrote:What's so bad about that?StrangerCoug wrote:In my opinion, a quarter of the town voting the same person stretches the term "random".ChannelDelibird wrote:Similarly, why do you find L-4 a problem in the random voting stage?
This is only a situational example, and I know that using the dice string for an actual random vote is controversial. It's outside the context of this case anyway.
It just seems like he's doing what he said drake was doing (except on another bandwagon)... Hypocrisy much?bird1111 wrote:Unvote, Vote: drake_259
I REALLY don't like how he just sneaks on to the Kairyuu bandwagon without adding anything.
So... you wanted your vote there until he got lower on your mafia list? Like... until he got less suspicious in your eyes? (Sorry, still a bit confused.)drake_259 wrote:sorry i missed the himbird1111 wrote:Could you clarify what you mean by this? I can't tell what you are trying to say here.drake_259 wrote:Kairyuu wrote:@Drake: If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me. If I'm right then I want explanation as to why you still like your vote.
i wanted it their until i have gone a bit lower on my mafia list,
so it should be like this:
i wanted it their until i have him gone a bit lower on my mafia list
I'm inclined to defend drake too... He started out with poor play, but that last post, even with the bad grammar, seems to me to be at least an attempt... That would be the thing we wanted?nhat wrote:Drake, you defending Kairyuu further supports my case.
My vote stands.
Sorry, I meant that I wasStrangerCoug wrote:...What!? It frustrates you enough to the point that he deserves to die? I hope I misinterpreted this, because that's what I'm getting from you.RandomGem wrote:Okay, I'm still not convinced drake is scum, but quite honestly, I'm getting annoyed by having to read his sentences enough to lynch him.
FoS: RandomGem.It's an anti-town move by him, but I don't think it's scummy enough to warrant a vote, which is why I'm still hanging on to it.
>.< EBWOP: Also, I feel that that is the basis for many of the votes on him - just his bad grammar and stuff.RandomGem wrote:Sorry, I meant that I wasalmostannoyed enough to lynch him. Meaning I would really appreciate being able to read his sentences without having to go back and decipher what they mean.
Yeah, but is it necessary to discuss it? As far as I'm concerned, speculating just gives scum ideas.Kairyuu wrote:@RandomGem: It is actually very important where the scum NK went, because we may have a power role waiting to reveal a confirmed townie or a scum if we can figure out whether or not it was actually attempted.
Meh. I've been trying to give my opinion, but it's mostly saying cases aren't good instead of making my own cases. So I regretfully agree. But, OMG, I'm still trying!11!11!1!!1iamausername wrote:RandomGem is pretty much the definition of an active lurker. He posts regularly, but says very little. He made a random vote in his first post, took it off in his second post, and has never voted since. Not good.
I was referring to this:iamausername wrote:This quote is interesting, because I don't see anyone suggesting any such thing. RandomGem/malthusis partnership? Definitely looks plausible to me.RandomGem wrote:And if we are in Lylo, then a malthusis lynch by policy would be very unwise... We should wait for his replacement at any rate.
Kairyuu wrote:@everyone: I guess that means I'm saying that I would support a policy lynch of malthusis in lieu of lynching Korts today if the rest of the town considers no information at all to be a better reason to lynch than what has been called a weak case, though I would also like some more participation and opinions from our lurkers (CDB, RandomGem, and StrangerCoug).
to when you voted me?Zakeri wrote:I'm torn between going on a No lynch or not, since I'm not entirely sure the NK would provide more information, and I think RG is a safe enough bet on scum in the first place. I'd like to see some more reactions before I decide on a vote in any case.
I think that's a bit too hasty...Kairyuu wrote:Exactly. You can admit to being scum now if you'd like, because you've pretty much given yourself away in the attempt to hint at being town.
What purpose does saying you're not scum even serve?StrangerCoug wrote:But I'm not scum. That's what I'm saying.