nonny wrote: axel: first off you are useing the word "schizophrenic" wrong, sorry i don't see thing or hear voices in my head.
You're right, I meant bi-polar.
/humor!
nonny wrote:Secondly you aren't taking interaction with other players into account. I was orginally after adel due to crap logic that made no sense and couldn't see why she was making such a poor case. The fact that tally jumped on with no reason gave me more insight since even before I replaced in I was suspicious of tally. Then I unvoted adel when tally brought up the "huh why did these poeple get reaplced..scum" logic. You didn't even taken in to account that I can read and listen to other poeple than adel, just because I was voting her doesn't mean I had eyes only for her.
I am trying to take everything into account, and I definitely try to look at the context (unlike some others). You attacked Adel for lack of participation/contribution. You didn't say anything about Adel's "case" against Elvis Knits initially.
Then
, when Adel pointed out that she had been "contributing" and referenced her case, you dismissed it and said that when you read it even before you replaced in you didn't see the logic.
Then you voted Adel after she voted you. You hadn't voted her before, but apparently her vote of you convinced you. You also (somewhat ironically) acused her of being jumpy with her votes - this is ironic because of how you jumped your own vote around at the end of the day.
You unvoted Adel for the reason she was being helpful by being active. I note that this came just two post after I said I wasn't going to be voting for
you
at this juncture over certain lurking persons because
you
were being active. Your unvote piggy-backed on my reasoning.
Nonny wrote:Another thing you don't take into account is that that "day" was over a month long, in that time frame you see new stuff, get frustrated with activity levels, and what not.
I'm not sure what I am supposed to take into account here. That people can get frustrated and do strange things?
Nonny wrote: I wanted to see poeple reactions to this. If they thought DGB was truly scum I don't think the vacation would factor in. However, if they themselves are scum going after an easy lynch then they would care, because it would slow down things and also take longer to get to night.
I see no evidence that this was your reasoning, that you questioned anyone about their voting of DGB or ever followed up this in any way. So, I mean, you can
say
this is what you were doing, but it does not appear to me that is what you were doing.
Nonny wrote:Furthermore, I believe your way of analysis is poor. Looking at only one person at a time doens't take into acount interactions with other nor what was happening at the time in the game. IF this was the only thing scummy you'd done I'd still go on it. Also you took more into account your opinion then mine, like when you said adel hadn't done anything that was convincing enough to remove a vote, that is your view. Also, why does adel have to be the one doing something convincing...tally did something convincing me she was scummy.
I'm totally taking into account "interactions" and what was happening in the game at the time (or at least, I'm
trying
to). I don't see where you can legitimately accuse me of this, so maybe you can explain better what I said that (in your opinion) wasn't taking into account the interactions and what was happening in the game.
Nonny wrote:Right now my gut and logic leads me to believe it's a axel-tally pairing. Esp, with how he was almost defending tally in a subtle way. Sure at the time what I had against her was lurking, but I also pointed out when she did vote it was to ask if we need a deadline or otherwise. Her actual posts lead me to the conclusion too, as well as her inactivity. You also said my suspicions came out of the blue when i switched near deadline? But yet you say one of my first suspects was tally. You give no "analysis" of my orginal case against her when i voted and don't even mention I had one.
I need that :eyebrow smiley here. Post #712 was where you first mentioned Tally, along with DGB. I described this post as your first expressed suspicions - and that's true. But it was
hardly
a "case." Actually, you don't even say that you are "suspicious" of Tally in that post, you just point out that she hasn't been posting much and hasn't contributed much content. In your very next post you say you would support a DGB or Adel lynch and don't mention Tally at all. Is that supposed to be this "original" case that you are referring to?
And the "case" you made at the time you switched your vote is irrelevant to the point I was making - which is that the timing was suspect. But it was also still odd that you would be jumping on Tally for her lurking and lack of contributing over DGB when those were perhaps the strongest points against DGB to begin with.
Nonny wrote:When someone is inactive as she was/is(even if she has IRL stuff going on she was inactive) it takes more time to analyize thier beheavior because at first there is less to go on. Also, the fact that tally is trying to say we should go off glork and lynch logic due to it. While yes she was voting logic at deadline, she disregarded that axelrod was glorks biggest case and suspect. It's been ignored, though their is the most to go off of for a cse on axelrod.
I don't think I understand this, but it certainly looks like you are trying to use Tally's vote of Logicitus as a point against her - she voted Logic while disregarding that I (Axelrod) was Glork's biggest suspect.
But you
agreed
with Talitha about Logiticus. You switched your vote
off
Talitha and
onto
Logiticus after this. You can't possibly be saying that Talitha's vote of Logiticus was another point you had against her.
So, what are you saying there?
I'll probably be looking Werebear/Phoebus's way next for this little series.