FlyingFoxBat (2) - FlyingFoxBat, dalt54321
Light-kun (2) - sirdanilot, omni
KrisReizer (2) - Brandi, OverCaffeinated
omni (1) - Inquisitor JL
Kmd4390 (1) - someone2
Not Voting: Light-kun, Kmd4390, KrisReizer, hitogoroshi
With
First up - I didn't actually have my first vote for you so I don't believe I ever DID take a vote away from you.Light-kun wrote:See? This is eratic. You took off a vote on me, for the reasons stated above, as a random vote. However, you are claiming to leave it on for these reasons. Just noting the slight contradiction here. On a second note, I did not apologize because I wanted the vote removed. Finally, it is not scummy to bandwagon someone for the intent or elicting a response.omni wrote:Thanks for the apology L-K, I'm not removing my vote however, you did just target me with basically no basis and then drew people onto your bandwagon, I'm not convinced about you yet.
That's exactly what I find strange: why did he corrected himself one minute after? He would have corrected himself the next time he would have posted, cause normally when you finish posting you don't see your message, you close the window or go directly to another game...If he had an idea in his head then it would fit better. I don't know, maybe it's a sign between buddies(cause three times in the same game is just very strange), but I may just be paranoid. I'll ask the question just to be sure. Light-Kun, how did you realize that you had self-voted you instead of voting Omni?someone2 wrote:
Maybe, we don't know, Light-Kun had another reason for this self-vote ( I find it quite strange, cause it's the first time I see someone self-voting, and now there's two self-votes in the three first pages of the game...)we're not in his head, but if this was a scummy action, Light Kun would have had to find an answer, and that's a situation where scum can easily slip.
How would it benefit scum to self-vote and then one minute later unvote and vote for some one else?
Quoted for effect...Oh, wait, WHAT? Did you just unvote me as though I were your RVS vote? Didn’t you just say you DIDN’T DO THAT?!?!?omni wrote:But that's my point I'm not even close to the most inactive, that's why it's so intreguing that Light-kun, with you as his cronie have it in for me I just don't understand that at all, it's so odd that I've been targeted there, why was my 'inactivity' (even though I've posted almost every day) worse than people who I don't think have posted yet if I'm scum they'd have to be all the more so on that theory. You haven't 'got me posting' I was always posting, you've just given me reasons to write essays in my posts rather than jokes, because there's not really a great deal to comment on in the random phase.KrisReizer wrote:Oh, hush. It was just a joke.Kmd4390 wrote:The N is for New York. It is a Yankees logo. If you don't know that, I am offended.
Well, there's a general view that lurkers are scum because they don't help the town. It seems misguided to me, hence why I didn't think it a good idea to jump on your bandwagon so quickly. But, now that we've got you posting, things should go a little differently.omni wrote:So my two posts and two lines of commentary are worse than inquisitors one post with one line, that's an interesting view you have there.
So I'm intregued why I was the one singled out by all this unless It isfor you knowing that he is scummy as well so you'll just target me as a result.
As for the lack of commenting, I just don't see much to comment on in this random voting phase and I'm just naturally a man of few words, but since we appear to be out of that phase I'll be commenting a lot more.
oh andunvote
First up: I pretty much just proved myself right....omni wrote:First up - I didn't actually have my first vote for you so I don't believe I ever DID take a vote away from you.Light-kun wrote:See? This is eratic. You took off a vote on me, for the reasons stated above, as a random vote. However, you are claiming to leave it on for these reasons. Just noting the slight contradiction here. On a second note, I did not apologize because I wanted the vote removed. Finally, it is not scummy to bandwagon someone for the intent or elicting a response.omni wrote:Thanks for the apology L-K, I'm not removing my vote however, you did just target me with basically no basis and then drew people onto your bandwagon, I'm not convinced about you yet.
What IS scummy is that you vote for someone wanting to get them to be "active" when there are people less active than them, that's what was scummy about it, and then bringing people to your bandwagon and having them help you and you helping them that's the scummy thing.
As usual you have failed to read and are just targeting me.
Why yes I DID just say that I didn't do that - Because I DIDN'T DO THATLight-kun wrote: Post 10: Omni vote SirD (Random)
...Quoted for effect...Oh, wait, WHAT? Did you just unvote me as though I were your RVS vote? Didn’t you just say you DIDN’T DO THAT?!?!?omni wrote: oh andunvote
omni wrote:Why yes I DID just say that I didn't do that - Because I DIDN'T DO THATLight-kun wrote: Post 10: Omni vote SirD (Random)
...Quoted for effect...Oh, wait, WHAT? Did you just unvote me as though I were your RVS vote? Didn’t you just say you DIDN’T DO THAT?!?!?omni wrote: oh andunvote
Your own post SAYS I didn't unvote you, I unvoted SirD not you, so yea I do accuse you of not reading, you don't read, you contradict yourself and you just write lengthy posts to try and lose your own contradictions in your posts, so you can accuse me of being erratic all you want, but you're contradicting yourself in your own posts.
And it looks like you've admitted you have it in for me? Is that because you know I'm not scum and have just decided I'll be an easy target for your scum buddies to bandwagon? Or have I offended you in some way?
Uhm, when I saw this post I planned to torn it up in little bits and explain why they were scummy, because this entire post is just so scummy. 'I did something wrong im an idiot OLOL0LZ XDDDDDDDDD!!!111 but its all good now RIGHT??11'Light-kun wrote:*Laughs so hard it actually hurts.*
Okay, I am officially doing too much at once.
No, I pretty much admitted that I am an absolute and total moron. *Laughs again*
I mentally crossed someone's vote for me in another game into your FoS post. Forget not reading, it was just plain lack of being absolutely thorough to the point of being anal. *SLAMS HEAD INTO DESK*
On the other hand, you have moved way up on my town list for your reaction play. (Too bad I can't be this convincing intentionally....)
Okay, Back to Square One as they say. (And no, I totally won't hold it against anyone who finger of suspicions me for the sheer stupidity of my play.)
ANYWAY, I don't thing the prodded people have poked back in, so.... suspicious, unless they are killaseven players, in which case lynching them is fine. (Killaseven lurked like this in a completed game, flipped scum at the end, which I suspected...so I am uberly skeptical.)
What else...
Well, Someone2 my answer is still above. And finally, sorry to anyone who read above post. It is really not necessary to read it except for history. (Subtract opinions against Omni though, which were apparently completely unfounded.)
*Second, stronger apology. SORRY for being a complete and total douche*
Uhm, going away for only three days won't get you replaced out, especially since the game is moving at a really slow pace (except for light-kun of course!)someone2 wrote:I'm going on vacation till next monday, feel free to replace me.
Problem being that he's the only one giving us anything worth talking about! And I can't see anything to change my vote or talk about anything else.sirdanilot wrote:Uhm, going away for only three days won't get you replaced out, especially since the game is moving at a really slow pace (except for light-kun of course!)someone2 wrote:I'm going on vacation till next monday, feel free to replace me.
People, a bit more posting of someone not called light-kun would be appreciated!