In post 94, Isis wrote:I have all sorts of theory opinions about this topic I'd want to say postgame but I'm not sure whether they serve my wincon right now.
can you explain this now?
I sure can, it's pretty moot with votato dead. I strongly feel the best strategy in nightless is to push the easy mislynches and leave strong players alive. Lynching strong players will be very hard, and the harder a lynch is the more you degraded your standing in pushing it through. Additionally, in endgame players are going to naturally trend towards paranoia on those slots.
The idea that you need to lynch strong players to win the nightless game is flawed. If it is a nightless game that scum are going to win, the best townies won't be on their A-game. Strong townies on their B-game are still hard to lynch, and are still at their most perceptive when they are reading a push they know is on town (themselves). They aren't as deadly if you pocket them or leave them in your PoE and push them gently in the ending scenario.
Votato is a pretty new player so I think he could benefit somewhat from this spiel, but I didn't see much upside on the other side of it.
"Let us say that you are right and there are two worlds. How much, then, is this 'other world' worth to you? What do you have there that you do not have here? Money? Power? Something worth causing the prince so much pain for?'"
"Well, I..."
"What? Nothing? You would make the prince suffer over... nothing?"
Okay I promise to actually play this game tomorrow.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
"Let us say that you are right and there are two worlds. How much, then, is this 'other world' worth to you? What do you have there that you do not have here? Money? Power? Something worth causing the prince so much pain for?'"
"Well, I..."
"What? Nothing? You would make the prince suffer over... nothing?"
How come there's not a detailed description of the sun setting and me turning into a vampire bat and slipping out of my noose and fluttering away to live another day?
"Let us say that you are right and there are two worlds. How much, then, is this 'other world' worth to you? What do you have there that you do not have here? Money? Power? Something worth causing the prince so much pain for?'"
"Well, I..."
"What? Nothing? You would make the prince suffer over... nothing?"
"Let us say that you are right and there are two worlds. How much, then, is this 'other world' worth to you? What do you have there that you do not have here? Money? Power? Something worth causing the prince so much pain for?'"
"Well, I..."
"What? Nothing? You would make the prince suffer over... nothing?"
This was my top townread before but I just wonder if I'm reading the tea leaves backwards.
His read progressions don't make sense and seem backwards.
In his iso he seems to give reasoning when he voted townies and just vote when he voted scum. I think it looks like level zero poor associative play even if his independent play looks pretty townish this game.
I don't think he voted me here as town when looker is so easy to lynch and I've "pocketed" him. It seems like he needed game acceleration badly enough that he'll break character because he was utr for a moment in his life.
I'm still on the position that townreading green Crayons has more value than anything else in my sort.
Cause Ali said he's town and I believe in em mostly. I independently feel like that too, most flipped townies have not scumread him. Please let him survive this game. It's a deserved win if he has a red pm
"Let us say that you are right and there are two worlds. How much, then, is this 'other world' worth to you? What do you have there that you do not have here? Money? Power? Something worth causing the prince so much pain for?'"
"Well, I..."
"What? Nothing? You would make the prince suffer over... nothing?"
Looker why do you think Green Crayons is the scummiest player after monkey?
"Let us say that you are right and there are two worlds. How much, then, is this 'other world' worth to you? What do you have there that you do not have here? Money? Power? Something worth causing the prince so much pain for?'"
"Well, I..."
"What? Nothing? You would make the prince suffer over... nothing?"
"Let us say that you are right and there are two worlds. How much, then, is this 'other world' worth to you? What do you have there that you do not have here? Money? Power? Something worth causing the prince so much pain for?'"
"Well, I..."
"What? Nothing? You would make the prince suffer over... nothing?"
"Let us say that you are right and there are two worlds. How much, then, is this 'other world' worth to you? What do you have there that you do not have here? Money? Power? Something worth causing the prince so much pain for?'"
"Well, I..."
"What? Nothing? You would make the prince suffer over... nothing?"
my role PM doesn't have Norwee, Deimos, or Cycle Men's name in it; look at the way I interacted with those players.
"Let us say that you are right and there are two worlds. How much, then, is this 'other world' worth to you? What do you have there that you do not have here? Money? Power? Something worth causing the prince so much pain for?'"
"Well, I..."
"What? Nothing? You would make the prince suffer over... nothing?"
In post 3812, Isis wrote:Looker why do you think Green Crayons is the scummiest player after monkey?
I don't want to spill anything until GC comes back and contributes, but, honestly I'm pretty sure this ends with HEM. I've already deprioritized this game and everything.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
If I trust past-GC, I want Looker --> Isis --> Elements --> HEM.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
In post 3810, Isis wrote:In his iso he seems to give reasoning when he voted townies and just vote when he voted scum. I think it looks like level zero poor associative play even if his independent play looks pretty townish this game.
This sounds like what FB was saying.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).