shaft.ed[2] (The Fonz, Erg0)
cicero[1] (Oman)
Oman[1] (shaft.ed)
Erg0[1] (cicero)
BillyTwilight[1] (Jitsu)
Jitsu[1] (Kison)
Not Voting[2] (BillyTwilight, vollkan)
---
God I'm playing terribly in this gameErg0 wrote:Ugh. Try again:
Erg0 wrote:Again, I don't think that he was specifically trying to force me to vote- I just think that his Fonz vote was completely ineffectual at that point. If I had to guess the reason, he may have been hoping to avoid being on a townie wagon at the end of the day - if two people had voted for CKD in the meantime then he wouldn't have had to do anything at the end of the day.See if you can spot the difference.shaft.ed wrote:I see Erg0 is back to his theory that I was trying to "make him" vote, and that I was avoiding being on a townie lynch wagon. I don't see either of these points as valid.
I've already stated I expected about a 10% chance of pushing a Fonz lynch in that short amount of time. I knew it was likely futile, but I was EXTREMELY clear where my vote between CKD and Adel fell if there was a choice between the two. I don't know how many more times I am going to have to say this. I really feel like people are just asking me the same questions over and over again, which is making me look defensive.Erg0 wrote:shaft.ed: I'm interested in hearing more about the second point - what was the reason for your last minute Fonz vote? Did you realistically expect a Fonz wagon to form in the last 24 hours of the day?
The vote was on page 1 and was clearly random. The "comment" was on page two, was partially a joke and was not in anyway related to the vote. Have you ever used this logic to attack a page 1 vote before? In fact have you ever used any logic to attack a page 1 vote before?Kison wrote:Shaft.ed again uses the explanation of trying to gauge Oman's reaction. I could make votes that I cannot follow up with a good explanation all day with a no-limit credit card, too.
I really don't see how you say I was trying to blend in.The Fonz wrote:You looked like you were trying to blend in. You made a delayed omgus vote, at deadline when it was clearly going to do little good. Yeah, that's a fine case.
I should get my reread in today. I won't do it in isolation if that matters.cicero wrote:I think Shaft.ed and Fonz should look past each other, imho.
I've already shot this idea down by the metric you proposed (post counts). Would you care to posit another?The Fonz wrote:Shooting for the middle of the pack. Surprisingly reliable, though damn hard to express.
I did not suggest post counts as a metric by which to judge your middlingness; that's simply dishonest. You may recall me harping on at you from the very beginning for your cautious, consensual style, your asking of other people to provide cases for you; nothing you have done since has done anything to sway me. (Delayed omgus is also fairly reliable, btw).shaft.ed wrote:I've already shot this idea down by the metric you proposed (post counts). Would you care toThe Fonz wrote:Shooting for the middle of the pack. Surprisingly reliable, though damn hard to express.
I interpreted this to mean posting frequencyThe Fonz wrote:I did not suggest post counts as a metric by which to judge your middlingness; that's simply dishonest. You may recall me harping on at you from the very beginning for your cautious, consensual style, your asking of other people to provide cases for you; nothing you have done since has done anything to sway me. (Delayed omgus is also fairly reliable, btw).shaft.ed wrote:I've already shot this idea down by the metric you proposed (post counts). Would you care toThe Fonz wrote:Shooting for the middle of the pack. Surprisingly reliable, though damn hard to express.
My case isn't weak at all, you're scum, and you're going to die.
Fonz do you have any recently completed smaller games as scum I could read?The Fonz wrote:He doesn't spam the thread like Oman, or lurk like Billy- basically, i think it all adds up to trying not to attract too much attention, whilst giving the appearance of contribution.
I actually had a dream that Cicero was scum in this game...shaft.ed wrote:Fonz:
106) States that if cicero's wagon had gotten sizeable he would have voted into it since he had a premonition cicero was scum. Four votes on page 4 seems rather sizeable.What was the premonition btw?
Here are all the minis i've ever played as scum:shaft.ed wrote:
Fonz do you have any recently completed smaller games as scum I could read?
Well then it must be true! (I don't know whether to be flattered or disturbed by the fact that Fonz is having me in his dreams. Do I look like my avatar and talk in a funny voice? I must know.)Fonz wrote:I actually had a dream that Cicero was scum in this game... Razz