Also, Snix's "cautious" attitude was gone D2 until the Ged wagon happened.
Snix (1): armlx
Not Voting (8): ChubbsMcLubbs, Eldritch Lord, forbiddanlight, mik5, orangepenguin, Scigatt, Snix, Sun Tzu
We can only lynch one at a time. I personally would have to take a couple hours to do a reread to decide which I thought was scummier. I don't have a couple hours til potentially tomorrow. However, your pointing out of voting trends was a really good call. This is the classic case of voting trends possibly finding mafia. I'll probably weigh in time to time on what's going on today, but I'm going to attempt to reread in my usual manner (spend forever on a summary, take a half hour beyond forever to post thoughts on my perception of the games events) throughout tonight and tomorrow (though I'm going to be out for some of tonight). I will pay special attention to Snix and Eldritch though.Reply with quote
Chubbs, those two have been responsible for turning both wagons into quick lynches so far.
Also, Snix's "cautious" attitude was gone D2 until the Ged wagon happened.
Can you tell us why Snix is scummier than EL, even though EL has done most of the blatant following?
This is funny given you quick hammered one of the people and were the L-1 vote on the other.
It's impossible for people to change their perception on matters regarding the game. Oh wait, that's only if you live in a world of absolutes. Welcome to the real world Armlx, where dynamic situations mean dynamic reasoning.armlx wrote:This is funny given you quick hammered one of the people and were the L-1 vote on the other.This game does need to slow down and provide more content as opposed to quicklynches.
Because clearly so much has changed that quick hammering was good yesterday but not today.Eldritch Lord wrote:It's impossible for people to change their perception on matters regarding the game. Oh wait, that's only if you live in a world of absolutes. Welcome to the real world Armlx, where dynamic situations mean dynamic reasoning.armlx wrote:This is funny given you quick hammered one of the people and were the L-1 vote on the other.This game does need to slow down and provide more content as opposed to quicklynches.
I was looking at his swap from Chubbs to Ged D2 out of nowhere. I could lynch either of them though at this point, and the level of barning EL has admitted to today makes him look a lot worse then earlier.Can you tell us why Snix is scummier than EL, even though EL has done most of the blatant following?
Fair enough. I think I'll stick on EL.
I was looking at his swap from Chubbs to Ged D2 out of nowhere. I could lynch either of them though at this point, and the level of barning EL has admitted to today makes him look a lot worse then earlier.
This is the kind of following Armlx's case against me is based on. I find direct interactions like these almost too obvious to be scum (but too obv scum to be scum is WIFOM)--so I guess that's not much to make a case on. Still, discussing who to vote and saying "I could go with either one" makes it sound like the case you have against either of us isn't that strong to begin with.forbiddanlight wrote:Fair enough. I think I'll stick on EL.
I was looking at his swap from Chubbs to Ged D2 out of nowhere. I could lynch either of them though at this point, and the level of barning EL has admitted to today makes him look a lot worse then earlier.
Not really. I looked for myself, and notice I'm not voting with armix. I just said that he might have a point on snix, I just personally think that the case on you is better. Really, either of you can go because of this:
This is the kind of following Armlx's case against me is based on
armix once again is right. Only scum buddies can trust each other enough for that. I'm just more willing to give Snix the benefit of the doubt since you were the one transparently following Snix around all game.EL, I don't buy the fact you trusted those enough to lynch someone that fast.