Plea.aioqwe wrote:Seriously, do you have any other suspicions or are you just going to badger me all day?
My post listed my suspiscions.
Where's your defense again? Only thing I saw was 'Oh that? I did that on purpose so it's not actually scummy'.
Plea.aioqwe wrote:Seriously, do you have any other suspicions or are you just going to badger me all day?
How is this a plea to emotion. Yes, I asked you a question but you specified that I was pleaing to emotion.Muerrto wrote:Plea.aioqwe wrote:Seriously, do you have any other suspicions or are you just going to badger me all day?
I made this request before you posted your suspicionsMuerrto wrote:My post listed my suspiscions.
Muerrto wrote:Where's your defense again? Only thing I saw was 'Oh that? I did that on purpose so it's not actually scummy'.
aioqwe wrote:In some defense:
How is my vote horribly placed? I'm one of two people voting seriously when I place my vote? I posted the my reasons and later added the hipocracy in using dice when looking for interactions in others.
I never said don't want a random vote, I said I would like to get out of RVS quickly. If there is nothing scummy, than a random vote helps us more than a no vote.
I said I was against quicklynches. Have you seen a bandwagon from RVS ever lead to a lynch (with the exception of that person responding in scummy manner)?
Oman, where was my bad logic?
This post sticks out to me right now. It looks like you want the game to get moving, but don't actually want to make any concrete statements. Cagey much?windkirby wrote:I have a DS, but I'm busy with "The World Ends with You".
Fortunately, because it's not like we have any mafia games going on or anything, we can guilt-free-ly focus all of our attention to the lovely games on the Nintendo DS regardless of what we're actually supposed to be doing right now, like, I don't know, play mafia or whatever. Wait, what is mafia again? More importantly, is everyone picking up on my sarcasm? Maybe it was too subtle...
He's actually right at least. 2 week deadline is actually a fair bit of time given people are actually going to be active. 5 votes on aioqwe is getting too close to a lynch. Decide on a lynch once deadline is really looming.aioqwe wrote:Seriously, do you have any other suspicions or are you just going to badger me all day? Most people try and get a lil' more out of D1 then try and lynch the first person they suspect.
Something LoudmouthLee taught me: Where is the scum benefit in something so easily checkable? How does it help his scumteam. Even if I am his scumpartner, that is hardly going to be used as a cornerstone for my lynch, so there is no benfit to hide it.Muerrto wrote:Food saying Darla was the first to mention dice when Oman was is fishy. Not sure what it means exactly but weird no one got any suspiscion of Oman out of that, just food. Why did food omit him?
Many? And any tells?Muerrto wrote:Strife is obv town in pretty much any game I've been with him and so far he's always been town.
Best. Post. So. Far.Liam wrote: This post sticks out to me right now. It looks like you want the game to get moving, but don't actually want to make any concrete statements. Cagey much?
Interesting or scummy?Muerrto wrote:Shrug, scum sometimes slip up. I just thought it was interesting he omitted you. Now granted, in my last game newbie town did that same thing, but excusing it because of that is ridiculous. He hasn't really given a reason for it yet either.
Food?
I was thinking it would draw more strings between food and darla. Scum are more perceptive to their own team than other misc. townies? If he read one of his teams post, he'll probably pay more attention to it than other's post.Oman wrote:Something LoudmouthLee taught me: Where is the scum benefit in something so easily checkable? How does it help his scumteam. Even if I am his scumpartner, that is hardly going to be used as a cornerstone for my lynch, so there is no benfit to hide it.Muerrto wrote:Food saying Darla was the first to mention dice when Oman was is fishy. Not sure what it means exactly but weird no one got any suspiscion of Oman out of that, just food. Why did food omit him?
Um...I said more interesting. I'm also not voting for him or you. Also, you very nearly got my vote here.Oman wrote:Unvote Vote MuerrtoI find it incredulous that you acutally believe that he could be scummy after a townie did it in LYLO and you accept that it could be town.
Which would be?aioqwe wrote:Muerrto, please address some of my stuff that was directed at you.
So you think when a townie makes a slip and diverts attention onto them instead of at the scum, that's ok?Oman wrote:I disagree that townies have to be more careful about what they type...scum so have soemthing to hide.
Firstly: So not their top priority. Scumhunting > Looking town.Muerrto wrote:So you think when a townie makes a slip and diverts attention onto them instead of at the scum, that's ok?Oman wrote:I disagree that townies have to be more careful about what they type...scum so have soemthing to hide.
Townies also have to pay attention to what they say otherwise they derail the real scumhunting.
First, if they divert from scum hunting then isn't that hurting scumhunting?Oman wrote:Firstly: So not their top priority. Scumhunting > Looking town.Muerrto wrote:So you think when a townie makes a slip and diverts attention onto them instead of at the scum, that's ok?Oman wrote:I disagree that townies have to be more careful about what they type...scum so have soemthing to hide.
Townies also have to pay attention to what they say otherwise they derail the real scumhunting.
Secondly: Don't tell me that a townie derailing scumhunting is worse than a scum being caught out by a slip.
aioqwe wrote:How is this a plea to emotion. Yes, I asked you a question but you specified that I was pleaing to emotion.Muerrto wrote:Plea.aioqwe wrote:Seriously, do you have any other suspicions or are you just going to badger me all day?
I made this request before you posted your suspicionsMuerrto wrote:My post listed my suspiscions.
Muerrto wrote:Where's your defense again? Only thing I saw was 'Oh that? I did that on purpose so it's not actually scummy'.aioqwe wrote:In some defense:
How is my vote horribly placed? I'm one of two people voting seriously when I place my vote? I posted the my reasons and later added the hipocracy in using dice when looking for interactions in others.
I never said don't want a random vote, I said I would like to get out of RVS quickly. If there is nothing scummy, than a random vote helps us more than a no vote.
I said I was against quicklynches. Have you seen a bandwagon from RVS ever lead to a lynch (with the exception of that person responding in scummy manner)?
Oman, where was my bad logic?
So, how exactly does this make me scum and justify your vote? I also said 'think' not 'sure'. I also said it was interesting than scummy. I'm not followwing your logic. If I'd voted him for it and called for his lynch, fine. I mentioned it, that's scummy?Oman wrote:1. Yes, but priorities.
2. I don't but nice loading there. I'm basically saying that I think this. I believe I said "think". So don't make this something its not.
3. Strawman, you don't get that answered. Its not worth my time.
I'd definitely call that a plea, that's all I can say about that. I'm not calling for your lynch I'm simply voting for you. So are 4 other people(3 now I think). Your defense is weak and not really a defense. Claiming you did something because of this AFTER you did it is as easy as simply doing it and making up a reason after. How is that a defense?aioqwe wrote:Muerrto:aioqwe wrote:Seriously, do you have any other suspicions or are you just going to badger me all day?How is this a plea to emotion. Yes, I asked you a question but you specified that I was pleaing to emotion.Muerrto wrote:Plea.
I made this request before you posted your suspicionsMuerrto wrote:My post listed my suspiscions.