OH, THE HORROR!Armlx wrote: I notice the contradiction, however I was to reason with Zoneace, which can be kinda difficult if I started shout "You are scum!" at him.
Why do you want to reason with someone who is second in your list?
Regardless of alignment, at the time I believed it was better for not claiming (I forgot about the prospect of MOAR VIGGING). As such, I was working on a case by case basis to explain why this was the right plan of action.Why do you want to reason with someone who is second in your list?
OH, THE HORROR!Armlx wrote:Regardless of alignment, at the time I believed it was better for not claiming (I forgot about the prospect of MOAR VIGGING). As such, I was working on a case by case basis to explain why this was the right plan of action.
You said that my role had a "win when you reach a majority" condition. That's an instant win. "You win when you lynch XX" is also an instant win condition. A SK or survivor, for example, is not.ZONEACE wrote:Simenon wrote:Why do you think there would be two neutral instant game winning abilities?
huh?
Simenon wrote:You said that my role had a "win when you reach a majority" condition. That's an instant win. "You win when you lynch XX" is also an instant win condition. A SK or survivor, for example, is not.ZONEACE wrote:Simenon wrote:Why do you think there would be two neutral instant game winning abilities?
huh?
So why do you think there would be two in a game?
And yes, you are 100 times better than any of the other vigging options.
For the part in bold: uh, what? When have we seen a Doc Brown killed N0? I assume N0 means Night 0, but I dont see that among the NPCs killed.ZONEACE wrote:I'm not suggesting actually lynching you jedi, if you hadn't noticed, I haven't made ANY attempt to get you lynched. Honestly, what would be the point of be faking a lyncher role? Lynchers generally are looked at positiely by the town. seriously if I was gonna fake claim I'd pull out Witness for the Government, and claim immunity to mafia kills or theone that was killed N0, Doc Brown, and claim i could go back in time and track the events of previous nights (which with my role wouldn't be too terrible of a way to get my target lynched).
Frankly I am an asset to the town. I'm a non threat. and Once my target and the towns match I can get out of the towns way and leave them with one less not strictly pro-town possibility later in the game when confusion could hinder the town. Seriously, we have at least 3 people right now that are better targets than me for the town to go after. I fail to see how I am such an immediate and necessary threat
um My goal for a lynch could very well be the same as the town's. its random. If i get the name of someone that the town decides to target that day then our goals are the same. If they aren't the same, I'm fully willing to put my goal on the back burner until it coincides with the towns. Why are you trying to derail the good lead we have for today and tonight and put it on me, one that is much less favorable for the town?armlx wrote:Twomz, why investigate him when our cop can also kill him on the spot. We know his goal for a lynch is not going to be the same as our own if he is telling the truth.
armlx wrote:Twomz, why investigate him when our cop can also kill him on the spot. We know his goal for a lynch is not going to be the same as our own if he is telling the truth.
armlx wrote:Could is the operative word.um My goal for a lynch could very well be the same as the town's. its random.
You definitely are playing the "neutral trying to survive" part well if you are scum though.