Mini 619 - Ramen Mafia (Over!)

[aioqwe]

It's late page one, sub-24 hours, I feel the need to get the game started a bit faster than usual. People will probably comment, or the lack of comments may be telling. So, as a possibly one-time act, it's worth a shot. Outside of me, Food's actions seemed interesting.

I'm dismissing sthar, and looking at darla and food.

I don't intend to hind behind it. I'm just saying that was my original intent. Take it for what it's worth

Liam, your first post at me doesn't seem so accusatory. Why the switch?

unvote, vote: food

I seem to have forgot >.<

But why not just chicken than? Meh.... whatever..... (as in, please still answer the question XD)

I think that covers everything...

[Oman]

Why not just chicken? Cause "Chicken" is the slangterm. I needed to add something more to make it a Ramen joke, otherwise, it would've just been chicken.

Its the same as the Slang term "Beef" it means "argument or displeasure with" as in "I have a beef with you". But Beef is also a Ramen flavour. But just saying beef isn't the joke, you'd have to add something to it to directly reference Ramen.

[CallMeLiam]

Liam, your first post at me doesn't seem so accusatory. Why the switch?

I wouldn't say I'm being too accusatory. Your actions didn't look so much like 'scummy' behaviour as much as they did simple 'shit-stirring'.

[strife220]

I thought my scuminess would get us out of random voting faster and more people would be questioning

Found a non-random place for my vote

Unvote, Vote: aioqwe

Getting out of random is good. If you're pro-town, getting us out of random by making us think you're scum is not good.

[Oman]

Dusagree with strife.

[windkirby]

I haven't seen any big leads yet, but

vote: melikefood.

Not crazy about dicing.

Also, the fact that Oman is an old homosexual female intrigues me. This could mean we've hit scum, as his profile indicates that he is a male. Therefore, he is a liar, and one should always lynch all liars. So I definitely GMEOH.

[melikefood]

I'm feeling kind of partial to food's attitude, why specifically mention Darla?

Because she was the first to mention that Dice votes were bad. No particular reason other than that.

food, you dice vote to get interaction from others, why limit yourself from this interaction?

My dice vote wasn't helpful at all other than making people accuse me. If I started an interaction with that, I'd probably be the person to get lynched, I'm not good at pulling stuff out of air.

[Oman]

Lynch all liars is a flawed strategy in and of itself.

[Flameaxe]

Votecount #1

Melikefood [4] (charter, Oman, Aioqwe, Windkirby)

Aioqwe [2] (Muerrto, Strife220)
CallMeLiam [1] (DarlaBlueEyes)
Muerrto [1] (ClockworkRuse)
Oman [1] (sthar8)
Beyond_Birthday [1] (CallMeLiam)

Not Voting [2] (Melikefood, Beyond_Birthday)

[strife220]

4 votes on MLF is much more pushy than a dice vote deserves, in my opinion. Me thinks there's at least one scum on that wagon, unless there's another reason for voting him that I missed. Aioqwe and windkirby both have pretty crappy reasons for joining a wagon like that.

[melikefood]

D: Oh no, 4 votes on me...

I'm dismissing sthar, and looking at darla and food.

...

unvote, vote: food

These quotes don't seem to agree with each other.
Why did you picked me over Darla?

[Muerrto]

Also, the fact that Oman is an old homosexual female intrigues me.

Ahahahahahahahaha sig'd!

[Muerrto]

Oh and happy with my vote. Kiwi's arguments have been crap and his bandwagon jump onto food is worse. He's also saying mostly filler junk(how long exactly did we wanna pursue the chicken joke?)

[charter]

4 votes on MLF is much more pushy than a dice vote deserves, in my opinion. Me thinks there's at least one scum on that wagon, unless there's another reason for voting him that I missed. Aioqwe and windkirby both have pretty crappy reasons for joining a wagon like that.

I'll go ahead and fix this for you.

unvote
vote strife

If you're already going to assume that one of four people is scum, I'll just go ahead and assume you're scum.

Serious now, you're already trying to direct suspicion towards others, hence my vote on you. Not really towards a single person either...

[strife220]

Serious now, you're already trying to direct suspicion towards others, hence my vote on you. Not really towards a single person either...

Aioqwe and windkirby both have pretty crappy reasons for joining a wagon like that.

What? 2 people, one of which I'm already voting for.

[melikefood]

If you're already going to assume that one of four people is scum, I'll just go ahead and assume you're scum.

I find this strange, he didn't vote on you directly. He pointed out that the other players who voted on me had weak justifications. Not you.

I didn't see you as suspicions until you said this.

[sthar8]

[quote="Oman, post 32]Dice tags are wrong and evil, and you should be killed. [/quote]
[quote="DarlaBlueEyes, post 33]I agree Dice tags = Bad. [/quote]

Because she was the first to mention that Dice votes were bad. No particular reason other than that.

What?

Food and Kiwi are high on my list, but so are windkirby and strife220.

Oman, would you care to elaborate on your thoughts about strife?

[melikefood]

Dice tags are wrong and evil, and you should be killed.

I agree Dice tags = Bad.

Because she was the first to mention that Dice votes were bad. No particular reason other than that.

What?

Food and Kiwi are high on my list, but so are windkirby and strife220.

Oman, would you care to elaborate on your thoughts about strife?

I have misinterpreted what I have read.
I find that you are reading too deep into nothing, so what if I pointed out that she said a certain person? What will that lead to?

[sthar8]

Food, I was giving you the chance to recognize your mistake and answer the question based on the correct information, since the answer you gave us was either invalid or incomplete. If you'd rather that I vote you over something so small...
Also, please restate "so what if I pointed out that she said a certain person? What will that lead to?" as I'm not sure what you mean by this.

[charter]

If you're already going to assume that one of four people is scum, I'll just go ahead and assume you're scum.

I find this strange, he didn't vote on you directly. He pointed out that the other players who voted on me had weak justifications. Not you.

I didn't see you as suspicions until you said this.

That was a joke, notice the "Serious now" part of my post. I suppose it should have come before my vote and not before my justification for it, but yeah, what I said where you quoted doesn't even make sense for a reason to vote someone.

Also, it's not that the people had poor reasons for voting for you, I agree, but you already labeled at least one of them as scum, which I don't neccessarily agree with at this point.

[melikefood]

Food, I was giving you the chance to recognize your mistake and answer the question based on the correct information, since the answer you gave us was either invalid or incomplete. If you'd rather that I vote you over something so small...
Also, please restate "so what if I pointed out that she said a certain person? What will that lead to?" as I'm not sure what you mean by this.

I made a mistake on reading which person accused me first on my dice vote.

I'm asking why you are looking so deeply into this, I really don't see a point other than saying that I'm lying.

That was a joke, notice the "Serious now"

I missed this, sorry.

Also, it's not that the people had poor reasons for voting for you, I agree, but you already labeled at least one of them as scum, which I don't neccessarily agree with at this point.

I can see your point, you think it might be too soon for me to start labeling people.
But I think that I've got enough information to at least put together a FoS on aioqwe and Windkirby.

aioqwe because he has two suspicions that were equal and put one on me without a strong justification that leaned towards me more that his other suspicion.

Windkirby because he put a vote on me with a flimsy justification, and it just looks like a regular bandwagon.

[Oman]

I like strife for town right now. He's got the right probing look going on, no he's not throwing suspicion on others, he's just scumhunting.

Kiwi has my suspicion for the same reason as was already mentioned, and he is the best spot for number 2

Unvote vote Aiquowe

[Flameaxe]

Finally got the opening scene up. It turned out longer than I had expected...

[Beyond_Birthday]

Anyway

vote: Beyond_Birthday

for being the last to post. Timezones be damned I want my arbitrary first vote.

I have read everything, but I am still not really convinced so,
Vote: CallMeLiam (Yes, it isn't bolded.) for making me laugh.

Alright, back to seriousness:

Considering the games start, I looked at people who seemed to be anti-town in the sense that they are not coming up with anything original:

Sthar8 (Suggested a policy for the town to abide, but most policies are controllable by mafia, as Oman pointed out. However, this is not necessarily scummy. And, it could be perceived as pro town. But, his attack on Aioqwe was based on the idea that his anxiousness is to speed up conversation, but that idea would seem scummy. This is just plain bad logic, as more data, information, and context is pretty pro town. Suspicious for now.)

Aioqwe (Simply dismissing a player's scuminess without any reason and suggesting someone else to be guilty is just plain scummy.)

Oman

(He is mod in my other game, and MUST be scum. Oh wait... that doesn't apply here. I guess he isn't scummy to me at the moment.

******
This is kind of premature, but based on my gut feeling, I am liking Aioqwe and Sthar8 for a scum pair. Very premature, I know, but I just get that feeling. But due to having some potentially protown qualities, I am not going to vote Sthar8 just yet. I will:

Vote: Aioqwe

[DarlaBlueEyes]

good grief, You guys are busy!!

*catching up!, will post as soon as I'm done*