Current VC:
DGB - 1
Glork - 2
Axel - 2
Adel - 2
why even comment on this? Just to make your arguement look bigger and more convincing or what? :eyebrows: Unless you're impliying that I'm making up reasons to be gone for a couple days because I'm scum, this comment seems entirely worthless.Axelrod wrote: 1st post announces he'll be away for the next few days.
at the time that's what people were talking about, so I commented on it.Axelrod wrote:2nd post to say something rather obvious (no one should edit other people's posts)
Stand by the fact that this is a useful comment, even if it's not really scum hunting.Axelrod wrote:3rd post to say that "prodding" the mechanics probably won't work in this game and we should just try scum-hunting (which he personally doesn't have time to do at the moment).
just my feel for it from the way the bandwagon formed. This was a good post.Axelrod wrote:4th post to say less than 1.5 scum on the Mathcam wagon (in answer to a question of Glork's, with no further elaboration)
see my comment about your comment about my first post...Axelrod wrote:5th post to say he's been busy but will have more time later.
Scum hunting, this is also a good posts.Axelrod wrote:6th post to say he's protown and to criticize Glork for making a list of people he thinks are town/scum on Day 1 with hardly any info.
This was also a good post.Axelrod wrote:7th post is primarily a defense of Mathcam (and his first that I would say counts as an actual contribution to the game), but it's a defense by way of criticizing the attacks being made against Cam, as opposed to asserting that he thinks Cam has been acting in a townie kind of way.
I still think pooky was being rediculous there.Axelrod wrote:8th post is to say he thinks Cam's claim of "protown" is equivilent to an alignment claim.
Yeah, kinda lame I'll admit.Axelrod wrote:9th post in response to Pooky's prod. He hasn't posted in 6 game days, and say "Hi."
Yeah, your point?Axelrod wrote:10th post is where he finally does another vote-count and we realize that Raj. was lynched like a week ago. He gives 1 liner comments on 2 people - Macros (don't know much about him, but this seems like something he would do so no reason to condemn him) and DGB (seems like a fine vote).
Hey, instead of a bunch of things that are just random comments this time he actually stated that something I did was scummy!Axelrod wrote:Day 2 starts with his speculation that maybe a vig. killed Cam (which is what I'd expect a scum to think, if not necessarily to come right out and say it).
Just because my initial vote was random doesn't mean my vote now is randomAxelrod wrote:Votes DGB for the same reasons as yesterday - which were never stated. The entirety of his prior comments about DGB were what he said in his last post of the day (seems like a fine vote). In fact, he admits his initial vote on DGB was random, and just says that sometimes you random correctly.
I don't make a habit of voting people who are confirmed town.Axelrod wrote:How about voting yourself for general scumminess and uselessness?
So that we'd lynch glork today?Axelrod wrote:Oh, it's not the only thing.Glork wrote:I'm still miffed that Axel tried to use the "Pooky wouldn't have been killed if he were wrong about both Glork and Cam" bit. That's a complete joke.
But humor me and why don'tyouspeculate on why the scum killed Pooky.
I'm with you there, we shouldn't just let people slide by being completely useless just because they're always like that.Axelrod wrote:No. Is that something like "Macros is terrible."elvis_knits wrote:Axel, you know Coron never helps, right?
If we've got a bunch of people in this game who can't be challenged for scummy play because they just suck, then we have already lost.
Were you hurt yesterday when Pooky said it?Macros wrote:i'm hurt!Axelrod wrote:No. Is that something like "Macros is terrible."elvis_knits wrote:Axel, you know Coron never helps, right?
If we've got a bunch of people in this game who can't be challenged for scummy play because they just suck, then we have already lost.
You say there are 5-10 big things, can I get 3 of them?coron wrote:And for why I'm voting DGB, it's largely like what you are talking about with glork, it's the 200 little things like the 5 or 10 big things. I honestly feel there are better ways to spend my time than catologuing every single scummy thing DGB has done. If you want me to go through a couple of posts I will, but I'm not really sure what good that will do.
oh, I see, I seem to have posted the wrong word in there. It should read "And for why I'm voting DGB, it's largely like what you are talking about with glork, it's the 200 little thingslogicticus wrote:You say there are 5-10 big things, can I get 3 of them?coron wrote:And for why I'm voting DGB, it's largely like what you are talking about with glork, it's the 200 little things like the 5 or 10 big things. I honestly feel there are better ways to spend my time than catologuing every single scummy thing DGB has done. If you want me to go through a couple of posts I will, but I'm not really sure what good that will do.
@ Axel
So do you think Coron and Glork are scumbuddies? You seem sure that Pookys death must mean he was onto something, but at the same time you think Corons activity thus fare is scummy as well.
you find this claim iffy?Phoebus wrote:Post cleaner.
Tags and double posts.