Mature Mafia: Game Over

[elvis_knits]

unvote; vote adel

Current VC:

DGB - 1
Glork - 2
Axel - 2
Adel - 2

[Macros]

hmmm
I'd be ameanable to glork at least, I need to take alook at adel

[Glork]

DGB, a huge portion of your case against me was that I was scumbuddies with Cam. How does this change with Cam having been Vanilla?

[DrippingGoofball]

I got your buddy wrong, doesn't mean I'm wrong about you!

[Glork]

That's ridiculous.

Your justification for me being scum was that I was protecting my scumbuddy.

With that justifcation gone, what else do you have right now?

[Axelrod]

I've written a big thing on Glork, but it's too long and unwieldy to post in one shot and no one would read it. There are no smoking guns, just some stuff I don't like a whole lot. He's good enough that you can't really expect him to make a major slip as scum though. I'm going to chop it down some and just try to hit the highlights later.

Coron is easier since he has done absolutely nothing all game.

1st post announces he'll be away for the next few days.

2nd post to say something rather obvious (no one should edit other people's posts)

3rd post to say that "prodding" the mechanics probably won't work in this game and we should just try scum-hunting (which he personally doesn't have time to do at the moment).

4th post to say less than 1.5 scum on the Mathcam wagon (in answer to a question of Glork's, with no further elaboration)

5th post to say he's been busy but will have more time later.

6th post to say he's protown and to criticize Glork for making a list of people he thinks are town/scum on Day 1 with hardly any info.

7th post is primarily a defense of Mathcam (and his first that I would say counts as an actual contribution to the game), but it's a defense by way of criticizing the attacks being made against Cam, as opposed to asserting that he thinks Cam has been acting in a townie kind of way.

8th post is to say he thinks Cam's claim of "protown" is equivilent to an alignment claim.

9th post in response to Pooky's prod. He hasn't posted in 6 game days, and say "Hi."

10th post is where he finally does another vote-count and we realize that Raj. was lynched like a week ago. He gives 1 liner comments on 2 people - Macros (don't know much about him, but this seems like something he would do so no reason to condemn him) and DGB (seems like a fine vote).

That's the entirety of Day 1.

Day 2 starts with his speculation that maybe a vig. killed Cam (which is what I'd expect a scum to think, if not necessarily to come right out and say it). Votes DGB for the same reasons as yesterday - which were never stated. The entirety of his prior comments about DGB were what he said in his last post of the day (seems like a fine vote). In fact, he admits his initial vote on DGB was random, and just says that sometimes you random correctly.

Last post seems to criticize me for not giving him better reasons to vote anyone else. Says give me a reason and he'll totally vote them.

How about voting yourself for general scumminess and uselessness?

Unvote;

Vote: Coron

I'm still going back and forth on Glork.

[Macros]

actaully, i'm gonig to go back to my

vote dgb

from yesterday
i liked it then and his blinkered vision has made me like it now.
die scum die

[elvis_knits]

Axel, you know Coron never helps, right?

[Glork]

I'm still miffed that Axel tried to use the "Pooky wouldn't have been killed if he were wrong about both Glork and Cam" bit. That's a complete joke.

[elvis_knits]

I agree that case was fail as is his current one on Coron.

[Axelrod]

Axel, you know Coron never helps, right?

No. Is that something like "Macros is terrible."

If we've got a bunch of people in this game who can't be challenged for scummy play because they just suck, then we have already lost.

[Axelrod]

I'm still miffed that Axel tried to use the "Pooky wouldn't have been killed if he were wrong about both Glork and Cam" bit. That's a complete joke.

Oh, it's not the only thing.

But humor me and why don't

you

speculate on why the scum killed Pooky.

[Glork]

I think he psuedo-confirmed himself during the whole alignment/role discussion, he had hardly picked up any flak/suspicion, and he was going out of his way to try to break down logic and find scum.


Those all seem like pretty dangerous things to a scumbag. Even if he had been left alive and I had gotten mislynched today, I sincerely doubt Pooky would have had his credibility shot.

[Coron]

1st post announces he'll be away for the next few days.

why even comment on this? Just to make your arguement look bigger and more convincing or what? :eyebrows: Unless you're impliying that I'm making up reasons to be gone for a couple days because I'm scum, this comment seems entirely worthless.

2nd post to say something rather obvious (no one should edit other people's posts)

at the time that's what people were talking about, so I commented on it.

3rd post to say that "prodding" the mechanics probably won't work in this game and we should just try scum-hunting (which he personally doesn't have time to do at the moment).

Stand by the fact that this is a useful comment, even if it's not really scum hunting.

4th post to say less than 1.5 scum on the Mathcam wagon (in answer to a question of Glork's, with no further elaboration)

just my feel for it from the way the bandwagon formed. This was a good post.

5th post to say he's been busy but will have more time later.

see my comment about your comment about my first post...

6th post to say he's protown and to criticize Glork for making a list of people he thinks are town/scum on Day 1 with hardly any info.

Scum hunting, this is also a good posts.

7th post is primarily a defense of Mathcam (and his first that I would say counts as an actual contribution to the game), but it's a defense by way of criticizing the attacks being made against Cam, as opposed to asserting that he thinks Cam has been acting in a townie kind of way.

This was also a good post.

8th post is to say he thinks Cam's claim of "protown" is equivilent to an alignment claim.

I still think pooky was being rediculous there.

9th post in response to Pooky's prod. He hasn't posted in 6 game days, and say "Hi."

Yeah, kinda lame I'll admit.

10th post is where he finally does another vote-count and we realize that Raj. was lynched like a week ago. He gives 1 liner comments on 2 people - Macros (don't know much about him, but this seems like something he would do so no reason to condemn him) and DGB (seems like a fine vote).

Yeah, your point?

Day 2 starts with his speculation that maybe a vig. killed Cam (which is what I'd expect a scum to think, if not necessarily to come right out and say it).

Hey, instead of a bunch of things that are just random comments this time he actually stated that something I did was scummy!

Votes DGB for the same reasons as yesterday - which were never stated. The entirety of his prior comments about DGB were what he said in his last post of the day (seems like a fine vote). In fact, he admits his initial vote on DGB was random, and just says that sometimes you random correctly.

Just because my initial vote was random doesn't mean my vote now is random

FoS: Axelrod

that really seems like something you'd have to intentionally misinterpret.

How about voting yourself for general scumminess and uselessness?

I don't make a habit of voting people who are confirmed town.

I'm still miffed that Axel tried to use the "Pooky wouldn't have been killed if he were wrong about both Glork and Cam" bit. That's a complete joke.

Oh, it's not the only thing.

But humor me and why don't

you

speculate on why the scum killed Pooky.

So that we'd lynch glork today?

And for why I'm voting DGB, it's largely like what you are talking about with glork, it's the 200 little things like the 5 or 10 big things. I honestly feel there are better ways to spend my time than catologuing every single scummy thing DGB has done. If you want me to go through a couple of posts I will, but I'm not really sure what good that will do.
edited in to avoid double post:

Axel, you know Coron never helps, right?

No. Is that something like "Macros is terrible."

If we've got a bunch of people in this game who can't be challenged for scummy play because they just suck, then we have already lost.

I'm with you there, we shouldn't just let people slide by being completely useless just because they're always like that.

[Macros]

Axel, you know Coron never helps, right?

No. Is that something like "Macros is terrible."

If we've got a bunch of people in this game who can't be challenged for scummy play because they just suck, then we have already lost.

i'm hurt!

[Phoebus]

If we've got a bunch of people in this game who can't be challenged for scummy play because they just suck, then we have already lost.

How terribly fatalistic.

Axel is terrible!

[Axelrod]

Axel, you know Coron never helps, right?

No. Is that something like "Macros is terrible."

If we've got a bunch of people in this game who can't be challenged for scummy play because they just suck, then we have already lost.

i'm hurt!

Were you hurt yesterday when Pooky said it?

[Glork]

Any thoughts/response regarding my answer to your question, Axel? Or Coron's, for that matter?

[logicticus]

And for why I'm voting DGB, it's largely like what you are talking about with glork, it's the 200 little things like the 5 or 10 big things. I honestly feel there are better ways to spend my time than catologuing every single scummy thing DGB has done. If you want me to go through a couple of posts I will, but I'm not really sure what good that will do.

You say there are 5-10 big things, can I get 3 of them?

@ Axel

So do you think Coron and Glork are scumbuddies? You seem sure that Pookys death must mean he was onto something, but at the same time you think Corons activity thus fare is scummy as well.

[Macros]

not in the slightest, pooky is as dependable and constant as ole yeller.
constant burst of hot vapour and fluffy uselessness, hes never respected me in mafia and my feelings are reciprocated in the form of pure admiration for his awesomeness

[Coron]

And for why I'm voting DGB, it's largely like what you are talking about with glork, it's the 200 little things like the 5 or 10 big things. I honestly feel there are better ways to spend my time than catologuing every single scummy thing DGB has done. If you want me to go through a couple of posts I will, but I'm not really sure what good that will do.

You say there are 5-10 big things, can I get 3 of them?

@ Axel

So do you think Coron and Glork are scumbuddies? You seem sure that Pookys death must mean he was onto something, but at the same time you think Corons activity thus fare is scummy as well.

oh, I see, I seem to have posted the wrong word in there. It should read "And for why I'm voting DGB, it's largely like what you are talking about with glork, it's the 200 little things

instead of

the 5 or 10 big things."

Sorry for the confusion.

[Coron]

Protown:
EK, Cam(town), Adel, Phoebus, Glork, probably Axel

Scum:
Raj

So our other two scums are among:
DGB, Macros, Pooky(town), Coron, Logic, Tally

Other than moving pooky into the definate town group, any changes here?

[Glork]

Axel's lower on my list, naturally. Phoebus' claim is iffy.




Can we prod Tally? Has she even posted today?

[Adel]

Post cleaner.

Tags and double posts.

you find this claim iffy?

[Coron]

Axel's lower on my list, naturally. Phoebus' claim is iffy.

Lower as in more or less scummy?