Mini 573 - Darkstalkers Mafia - Game over!

[gorckat]

Not just scum, scum power role.

[armlx]

You mean "Worst scum who got the bitch job of being sent for the kill"?

[gorckat]

No- I was thinking of a night when another person had died, as in past tense information.

And town can go one for one a lot easier than the scum can.

[Claus]

Well, if a watcher has any interesting results on Alabama, they will probably claim those results when appropriate.

How about looking back to D1 now and trying to find the scum in the old fashioned way?

[Claus]

Alabaska. Urgh.

[gorckat]

Holy crap- GW hasn't posted here since 4-7, and spring who had soemthing up there sleeve is absent a week, too.

Mod: prod spring and GW?

[Xtoxm]

Once or twice a week I will be sending activity checks to all players who haven't posted in the last 72 hours.
If you receive an AC please don't feel offended, this is my way of keeping the game alive by making sure all players are still around.
Simply opening the AC PM is enough to inform me that you are still around and playing. No need to answer the PM.

This is not a prod request game...Yeh they need to post more than that.

[gorckat]

Check rule two. Protecting one/both of them form attention?

[Xtoxm]

Oh...Honestly didn't realise that. Read rule 1, and stopped and quoted as I thought i'd found the games policy.

[Flameaxe]

Piper: I see him as close to confirmed town.

[armlx]

Still happy with my read on Flameaxe, but I also want to hear from Opposed Force.

[Flameaxe]

Still happy with calling armlx a complete retard.

[Flameaxe]

Still waiting for an acceptable example too.

[armlx]

I don't feel AITP should be disqualified in the slightest. My other examples are scum chat, so I can't really link....

[Flameaxe]

Again, how convenient.

AITP is not a good example of a meta. I don't have to keep information from scum here. This (for the most part) is a standard mafia game. They don't mingle well together.

Also, have I even played with you in scumchat? I rarely go there anymore, and haven't played a game there in months...So I highly doubt that meta.

[armlx]

Definitely have scum chatted with you. My memory of the specifics is mildly fuzzy, but I seem to remember you being scum role cop and blowing up similarly, as well as acting similarily to this game before hand.

[Flameaxe]

I have never been a scum role cop. Sorry, but unless you can prove it, I guess you get a...

Vote armlx

. Try pursuing an actual meta this time? It might get you far.

[armlx]

I distinctly remember as town lynching you FTW when you claimed role cop after you blew up D1 or D2 when pressured.

[Flameaxe]

That's nice. But you're wrong. And you still have no proof, and no case. Not to mention a faulty meta example.

[Alabaska J]

I think it is just as convenient for you that these metas can't be proved, because if armlx is right we have no way to confirm. Of course you are going to deny it either way. This is WIFOM. I suggest we move on to something more productive, like finding scummy things Flameaxe and/or armlx have done in this game outside of the recent conversation, which, again, I consider WIFOM. I propose that both of you show evidence in game of the other's scumminess to resolve this. Fair?

[GhostWriter]

No need for a prod. I am here now. Sorry. Dealing with life for a bit. Couldn't handle posting on MafiaScum for that little bit, but I'm okay now. I don't think I'm going to be able to post anything heavy today, so I'll be back in tomorrow. If I can post today, I'll do so.

[Flameaxe]

I think it is just as convenient for you that these metas can't be proved, because if armlx is right we have no way to confirm. Of course you are going to deny it either way. This is WIFOM. I suggest we move on to something more productive, like finding scummy things Flameaxe and/or armlx have done in this game outside of the recent conversation, which, again, I consider WIFOM. I propose that both of you show evidence in game of the other's scumminess to resolve this. Fair?

But he is pushing my lynch with those metas that can't be proved. Better yet, he's pushing my lynch with ONE SINGLE GAME that wasn't even a conventional game...

I agree, lets get on to something productive. Something like armlx actually backing up his vote with something substantial.

Stop ignoring my questions also.

[armlx]

Quite frankly, I have nothing but my meta-read on him, but I am very sure it is correct.

[Flameaxe]

Quite frankly, I have nothing but my meta-read on him, but I am very sure it is correct.

Again, using one game (not even regarding the types of game) is not a reliable meta. How you are "very sure it is correct" based on one game? I am still expecting better, will/can you provide better?

[Alabaska J]

That's all you have armlx? Really? Is there truly nothing in this game that adds to your case? You've been town so far, but seriously,

FoS: armlx

. Come, on make a case why don't ya.