Mini 573 - Darkstalkers Mafia - Game over!

[Xtoxm]

So, what was Ooba's list useful for?

He is clear.

[Xtoxm]

Really, why? (oh, btw, SL is a she).

I find it hard to explain why...I just do.

[Xtoxm]

So why do I get upgraded to be the third scum over people you have no read either way?

When I got to the end of the post, you were the one that stuck out to me. I didn't read back again.

[Xtoxm]

I'm finding your analysis wish washy and scummy. I expected you to be a bit more solid on your opinions of other players.

Well, they are my genuine opinions, from reading through.

[Xtoxm]

And I didn't read through Al's posts btw, I just took it as red, as a lot of people has said it, and he's posted a hell of a lot.

Came across a few comments that put it together for me.

[gorckat]

Xtom's rapid fire responses look like a guilty conscience trying to explain himself.

@Flame: Do you think either armlx or Xtomx are coming at you from a scum position?

[Drunken Piper]

Posting in ryhmes could be an excuse to talk less. He presses lurkers quite hard...I'm not sure if it's genuine. I'll put him leaning scum.

Pressuring lurkers and lynching lurkers are two different things,
why exactly do you feeling I have mafia wings?

I find it harder to make out what you're trying to say, talking like that.

Please provide a quote that you find hard to understand.
and I will shed some more light on the post, at Hand

The comment on "not random voting thing" - I have said i'm not gonna random vote before, in certain games, but I have also random voted in otehrs...So I can say from experience that's not a scumtell...Also seems a pretty weak reason to be attacking someone with.

Do you have a completed game where you said you were against random voting?
Your defense of Ranger/Flame, then you vote him, I am noting.

Posting in ryhmes could be an excuse to talk less. He presses lurkers quite hard...I'm not sure if it's genuine. I'll put him leaning scum.

So, you think that my posting style is scummy?
Just throwing that out there, without much meta, huh, chummy?

Jesus, after WEM, I thought you might actually have a brain. Now, I'm reconsidering that assumption.

THERES. NOTHING. TO. DEFEND. AGAINST. YOU. FUCKING. RETARD.

THERE ARE NO FUCKING REASONS TO FUCKING DEFEND AGAINST, YOU FUCKING RETARD.

nice...

(wondering if you are going to provide any content today or just hurl insults)

Current thoughts on AJ now?

waiting for a post from Opposed to make me go wow.

(wondering about Ghost's thoughts on Flame,armix, and xtoxm. Spring, your sleeve? Current thoughts on the game? Gorckat, thoughts on Claus Day 2? Also, Ala, since the SK is dead, did you target anyone last night anyway?)

Xtom's rapid fire responses look like a guilty conscience trying to explain himself.

@Flame: Do you think either armlx or Xtomx are coming at you from a scum position?

(thinking this post deserves a QFT and is a good question)

[Xtoxm]

Um, most of what you say really...Just makes things harder.

Mini 539.

[gorckat]

FWIW, I'm getting used to DP's posting. Yes, its odd, but you just need to read what it says, not read the rhyme, if that makes any sense:

Do you have a completed game where you said you were against random voting?
Your defense of Ranger/Flame, then you vote him, I am noting.

The first line makes sense the way it is written. I read the second as: You defended Flame, then voted him, which I think is noteworthy.

Its almost automatic for me to now translate it as I'm reading it.

[Xtoxm]

I wasn't defending him, I was defending his side of the argument...I was saying it was a weak reason to be trying to attack him with.

I went through and read, and posted my opinons as they formed.

[Flameaxe]

Xtom's rapid fire responses look like a guilty conscience trying to explain himself.

@Flame: Do you think either armlx or Xtomx are coming at you from a scum position?

Armlx more than Xtoxm. But both attacks seem off to me.

[Alabaska J]

unvote

. Satisfied for now, but those last posts do seem a little scummy, like someone said earlier (too lazy to scroll up).

FoS: Flameaxe

. Shit man. I don't agree with the argument either, but you are overboard. Sounds a lot like scum panicking to me. :/ I think a better attack is in my Day one review post:

Flameaxe: First off, buddy, it's Alaba

sk

a J. Definitely not from alabama . Also, your post looks opportunistic to the max and your discussion of RotN at the beginning is WIFOM as of course you would say that no matter what alignment you have. Also, you seem tunneled on me for some reason. Looks a little opportunistic, if I may say so myself, especially compared to the other replacements, who at least analyzed everyone. Also, you seem like a possible buddy of GW because of the whole RotN thing. He looked pretty scummy, and I don't like you, so

confirm FoS: Flameaxe

.

@ Flameaxe: the connection is that a lot of what seemed scummy about GW is how he reacted to your predecessor. "Your" actions + his reactions = suspected scum buddies.

I wanna see how this turns out, so I won't vote for now.

@gorckat: Xtoxm seems slightly scummy, but not voteworthy at the moment in my eyes. I'll add back on an

FoS: Xtoxm

for now, but the fact he's started posting removes most of my main scumtells on him.

FoS: Ghostwriter

because of Day One actions. Possibility of GW-Flameaxe pair is strengthened in my eyes with Flameaxe's recent reactions.

[Flameaxe]

Alabama: 1) How am I going overboard?
2) How does that make me scum?

Two simple questions is all I ask of you for now.

[gorckat]

Al- did you look at someone last night? Someone else asked and I haven't seen an answer.

[Alabaska J]

@gorckat: Oh, no. As far as my pm was worded, I think there is one sk, so I figured it would be pointless. :/

[gorckat]

It would be helpful to do so in the future, to ferret out anything like a scum-aligned RB lacking a better target.

[armlx]

It would be helpful to do so in the future, to ferret out anything like a scum-aligned RB lacking a better target.

? Lacking a better target then someone who is confirmed to not have a night ability? That doesn't make sense.

Only thing targetting could do is be confirmable potentially by a watcher or get PGO'ed, but the later is bastard moddery so you should just target someone every night, preferably someone you would expect to be watched.

[Claus]

Hello?

[Claus]

Meh, might as well post some content myself.

I'm not sure I see Flameaxe as scum - did not post that much content in my eyes - could go either way. I would love a more solid case to be made - a PBP or something.

Xtomx, still looking like a reasonable choice for a lynch.

I don't like the "so, what did you get yesterday?" from gorkcat. Rubbed me the wrong way, I'm not just sure how yet. The "RB with nothing better to do" excuse doesn't make much sense.

I would love more people (SL? GW? I don't even remember the whole playerlist) would weight on both Xtomx and Flameaxe and/or propose other lynches.

[Drunken Piper]

only two posts

Reading the thread to see what's going on. Give my thoughts and opinions later.

Ergh. Heavy post on my part coming up once I re-read the thread.

this last post is 7 days past.
how many more will pass?

Mod, please prod GW and Opposed

also my questions are still waiting to see,
answers to come to me.

Xtoxm,

why exactly do you feeling I have mafia wings?

Please provide a quote that you find hard to understand.

Flame,

(wondering if you are going to provide any content today or just hurl insults)

Current thoughts on AJ now?

Others,

wondering about Ghost's thoughts on Flame,armix, and xtoxm. Spring, your sleeve? Current thoughts on the game? Gorckat, thoughts on Claus Day 2?

[gorckat]

I don't like the "so, what did you get yesterday?" from gorkcat. Rubbed me the wrong way, I'm not just sure how yet. The "RB with nothing better to do" excuse doesn't make much sense.

Please let me know if it occurs to you why it bothers you or makes you uncomfortable that I'd be interested in people targeting Al.

this last post is 7 days past.
how many more will pass?

And seven posts since in another game,
'tis a bother and quite lame

I'm curious where he'd weigh in on both the tizzy with Flame and armlx/xtoxm and this little sidebar of mafia RB/targeting speculation.

[Claus]

I don't like the "so, what did you get yesterday?" from gorkcat. Rubbed me the wrong way, I'm not just sure how yet. The "RB with nothing better to do" excuse doesn't make much sense.

Please let me know if it occurs to you why it bothers you or makes you uncomfortable that I'd be interested in people targeting Al.

What bothers me is that I can't see why town would do that. How does it help scumhunting?

But hey, at this point in the day, I'm much more interesting in seeing who thinks who is scummy and why.

By the way, I lol'ed at the way you asked that. Seems we're learning some lessons from yesterday

[Claus]

I'm much more interesting --> I'm much more interested

[gorckat]

What bothers me is that I can't see why town would do that. How does it help scumhunting?

Hypothetical: Watcher watches Al. Two people target him. One's probably a doc (he is confirmed, after all). And the other would be?

[armlx]

So in that scenario you trade doc for scum?

Not a fan....