In post 2089, Mathdino wrote:In post 319, FinnLaw wrote:Currently reading up, but its nearly 1 in the morning here so off to bed soon.
But first, while I have found Scripten slightly suspicious his lynch isn't going to happen today and shouldn't happen anymore. I agree with what's been said about his wagon since his soft-claim. Taking a risk on his lynch is unnecessary as it could potentially result in the lynch of a town power role when instead we can look elsewhere to try to the other scum. Come day 2 Scripten can prove he's town and if he doesn't then we lynch him.
UNVOTE: ScriptenIn post 358, FinnLaw wrote:Scripten- I have Scripten leaning scum. I have previously spoke of how I didn't like Scripten's early case on Beck. I thought he had unreasonable expectations of what he expected from Beck and thought his earlier vote and attack on Beck over the non-committal stuff was weak and him trying to push something as scummy when it wasn't.
While the flavour discussion was slightly confusing and one of the reasons I struggled to get involved, I didn't like Scripten's stance on the issue. As brought to light by others, I also didn't get why Scripten would find Grib's comments regarding flavor reasonable if it contradicted his own pm, surely it would make you a bit weary of it. But, Scripten has now soft-claimed, so he is on hold but hopefully he is being truthful about his claim come day 2.
These are his largest thoughts on Scripten, who I'd assume he'd watch because that's the reasonable thing to do. Not really interesting tbh.
He never got a chance to watch ANYBODY.
I watched Scripten because I thought that there was a good chance he'd be targeted by scum on night 1.
There's a rabbit hole here that I'm not really interested in exploring today. If I live and the game continues, I'll probably discuss it with him in the neighborhood tonight and in the game thread tomorrow.