Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Mafia - Game Over
-
-
talah
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Nah, you're a better vote. You can be the counterwagon, kay?In post 66, DrDolittle wrote:sakura is such a good vote im not even kidding-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Wow. So. Right.In post 101, DeasVail wrote:Why I think DrDolittle is scum:
66 strongly suggests that he has a scumread on Sakura/is pretty invested in the wagon, and that his vote in 19 was serious. What I'm wondering though is why he didn't share his reasoning for Sakura being scum. If town are making a serious vote during what is still semi-RVS, they want to show everyone how smart they are and share their reasoning! Despite the resistance to Sakura-scum, he doesn't get very involved in trying to read her or gathering support (Matias and kanye's play around Sakura appears a lot more genuine by comparison). While I do have doubts, I don't think his play is particularly unlikely to come from scum so far either so I'm pretty happy with my vote here.
Are you saying you somehow reverse-telegraphed your scumread on dolittle, which you first mentioned when his only post was a naked vote?
Didn't I do exactly the same thing as him, in naked voting and then reaffirming that he was a choice vote?
What do you think of mastin?-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Because you laid down a seemingly "serious vote" on him based on him making a naked vote and nothing else.
So I wanted to see what you would do when I a) did virtually the same thing and b) joined the same wagon as you in doing the same thing.
However, I pretty much accept your response so am happy to see where you're going with this for now.
And I suggest to everyone else that a dolittle vote, is a pro-town vote.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Hey. Waynegg. Sweet.
Caught your post and have just flicked forward to post this. So now I have a question which occurred to me at the time.
Did you out your ENTIRE scumteam in that one post earlier?
You haven't even given a reason for any of them being town! Just "hey they're town townbloc yo"
And, how in the LORD'S HOLY FUCKING NAME can *I* be playing divide an conquer either as scum or town? Scum don't divide and conquer MASTIN and DEASVAIL, mastin of whom wasvotingdeasvail? Probably based on picking up my own tell on des? Because otherwise he hasn't explained it? His gutread?
Town are awesome dividing and conquering scum - YEY. And picking up on stupid troll tells YEY.
VOTE: waynegg
My suit has 1-shot tracker, trump that BEATCH.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
I also have a townread read on Matias because his posting has seemed fluid and natural, and I will also town read pieguyn on the basis of having *specifically* townread Matias rather than just having a noncommittal town list of a bunch of unspecified-reason names.
So actual townbloc:
talah | pieguyn | Matias
feel free to add to the list with good reasons. The core will validate your reasoning and return a result.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Sure there's town motivation. I'm town. I'm quite happy to scream it into your face for however long it takes you to understand.In post 210, waynegg wrote:The intent here doesn't look like you're trying to divide and conquer Mastin and Deasvail, but it does look like you're trying to divide and conquer. There's no town motivation at all.
Um, YEAH. That's an aspect of my scumhunting, I like to have a couple of irons in the fire, I like asking players about other players so I can see if they're uncomfortable responding.In post 211, waynegg wrote:To be specific, you're playing Matias against Mastin against deasvail against Doolittle.
Yup. You're going to see me absolutely ignoring "classic" scumtells a lot in this game. I suggest you get used to it.In post 214, waynegg wrote:
...and because my vote resides on himIn post 213, AGar wrote:
What in the literal fuck is this? Did you just claim because youdidn't like a players town reads? Because they might be gut-based?Holy. Shit.
This is unbelievable.
Agar - what's with your outrage at me claiming a pretty weak PR? Are you.. Going to.. *snicker* ..suggest I should be POLICEH LENCHED?
Back to you Weg - I'll let you in on my gameplan.
1) I pop in from time to time either to heavily OMGUS on people attacking me or attack weak logic and ambiguous statements
2) I act in an obvious-town manner
3) I vote freely and consistently to run wagons up, but choose *actual* lynch-wagons in consultation with my townreads
3) I force scum to decide whether they're going to try to lynch me, or nightkill me
Now the only couple of things I'm going to try to do a bit differently based on experience, is be *slightly* less antagonistic (or at least, all things in moderation) and also to avoid tunnelling if I can as it never really works out well for me.
So there you go. I'm telegraphing my intentions and my future gameplay. I'm being perfectly honest. Presumably you have a townread on me now. Pity I don't have one on you, nullsie.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Des, Thanks for the compliment, and like I said before I'm fairly happy to see where you're going with things.
Actually, I'm looking to abandon this vote on waynegg and I was thinking of asking Nati if he would be willing to discuss/vote together for a bit to get a read on him. I'm wondering now if you'd be interested in playing like that for a bit too.
I was going to suggest a couple of options - Beli, mastin, and Majiffy.
Nati, I think you might be voting the wrong person - interested in getting off that stale vote and forming an informal voting pool (lol, sic) for a page or two?
My view on mastin is that his reads have been too obscure to see the intent behind, although if he has a reason for going from utterly verbose to overly succinct and is town, he could be an asset later and he'd be likely to show his hand with his play. I'd be more likely to want to run a wagon on him if he continues this for a couple more RL days.
Majiffy I'd love to make a nice nest of votes as a surprise for when he next reads the thread. I agree with the asking about RVS thing, and think it was weak (in terms of, "dude, weak") not to lay some kind of vote or comment down. Now if he intentionally didn't vote to stir up conversation.. We'd be doing him a disservice not to vote him, frankly.
Beli I'll leave for now but I did think of him as someone who might benefit from a few votes. If you two think he's a good wagon, will still do so.
So.. Up for a Majiffy wagon. I'll probably check back once more before bed in a few hours, lemme know.
ed: hi waynegg ;D-
-
talah
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Hm.In post 270, Majiffy wrote: Lets put it this way; to the 9 or whatever people voting me: What have I done that isscummy?If you're voting me, at 11 pages in, for "content-less posts" (all whopping three of them!) then I challenge instead your ability to scumhunt. 11 pages, of which presumably have plenty of content - since you're voting someone for alackof content - and I'm your biggest scum read?
Ya'll are good at this game.
Well, *I'm* voting you because I thought you might like to know you're loved and respected enough to be worth running up a lovely wagon on. And FYI - we're out of RVS.
When will you be caught up then? Because first you express pleasure that the game isn't moving at breakneck speed, and then you say you haven't made enough posts (and in fact that the game's not far enough in) to be called scummy yet. Are we going to crucify those who *have* posted content? Or are we going to wagon up on those who haven't?
Well hey, I don't know if you're scummy or not but this is a decent way to find out.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
^ heh, nice. No doubt you're town now, I'm glad that my townread on you is correct :)
Your deflection comment on Empking occurred to me as well. I guess what I've learned about Empking, is that he responds well to pressure, so if he's not contributing, he definitely should be wagoned, preferably baselessly.
Although if one *really* wanted a base at this point - it's interesting that the deflection is onto the other player I named as a possible wagon (Beli), onto Sakura (current wagonbait), references Majiffy's indignance to support 'baseless wagon = bad' (where it's not, it gives some great feedback and analysis as long as it's not quickhammered - which as an aside I was slightly interested that Majiffy almost got to L-1), and then adds a lurker who I can't even remember a post from (dopog) as alternatives.
I mean, that's some pretty solid deflection.
I think I understand Nati's rationale on the jump but I'll leave that to him - and wait for Matias' feedback on an official induction given your slight hesitation (which is fine).
---
I wouldn't be inclined to wagon Sakura - at this stage. She will need pressure at some point but might be easier to read through encouragement and watching changes of attitudes, votes, etc. I don't think we'll get anything useful from her if she's the major L-1 wagon.
I'm actually interested to know what kainwest thinks of the alternate townbloc / wagoning strategy right now. He's a pretty good player from what I've read and I think I'll recognise a faulty or false opinion, terse as the feedback may be.
kayne - that's a challenge.
k - Also do you think waynegg's trolling or showing signs of scum? Emp?-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
^^^ That in response to pieguy, btw. I ain't got a read on you yet leviathan, ehh tending nicely consistent but y'know.In post 297, talah wrote:^ heh, nice. No doubt you're town now, I'm glad that my townread on you is correct-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
I'm doing wagon formation and supporting folks I think are town, simultaneously checking out what they think and updating those reads and putting pressure on scum and town to perform.
You're blandly branding folks as scum or town and giving your opinion on gameplay.
You're my bird in the hand unless you do something more than grandstand.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Sorry for drunk posting bit yeah I'm a bot why don't you justa man up and join the voting crew
Nacho:
And your sizeable town bloc seems like the promise of a large cock and I'm not seeing it, nacho.
Use the curly brackets {talah | pie guy | matias | nati I think}
can't self-nominate except for me.
Hey I have more confidence that majiffy's going to answer a question than you. Why are you avoiding commenting on me?-
-
talah
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
You and I, my friend, are in direct conflict on Majiffy.
I don't know where I saw it but I've seen the whole hiding arguments behind hyperlinks crap from him before. I can't even make heads or tails of his attack on pieguy, and I don't have time to open 45 tabs to analyse it. So I tend to think he reads scum.
And you seem nervous and I don't like the fact that you mention Jiffy and then tack on Levi as if to hide your association with Jiffy.
So - here I have my first of many many crackpot theories. You and Majiffy scumteam. Just putting it out there.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Thanks ios7, lost my post. Sure why not, that'd make a lot of se-- whu? HEY HEY HEY THERE HOLD ON A SEC.In post 350, DrDolittle wrote:Talah. I also called you and pieguy town. Are we teh scumz together?
Nah so if you're gonna sneak in a town read on a scumbuddy, why not throw a couple of legit townies down as townreads first to hide the scum-shame you feel.
Anyway I'd probably not mind leenchen you today. If you want to know why, just go look at your ISO.
Ready?
Reads on Deasvail and mastin. Reasons for the reads.
QUICK QUICK QUICK time's a-wasting!-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Well I suppose "we the undefined collective", in answer to a question which rams a broken pool cue into the orifice of the notion that specificity is possible to convey using the English language, attempt to clarify both the premise and the question first.In post 381, Belisarius wrote: So you're saying you're being scummy. What do we do with people who are being scummy?
"So you're saying you're being scummy"
No, I asked Sakura why she didn't challenge my inconsistency. It turns out I'm not on her radar, and that she has Levi on the mind. I accept that response because it means shedoeshave an agenda and it looks to be scumhunting. I'll keep a peripheral eye on her and see.
If you really want to know, I voted Sakura because - priorities and priorities. Nati and I vote-teaming is a useful strategy, I think, and I'm a bit disappointed Des didn't follow along (although I missed the fact he was already voting Majiffy in the first place, which may have been a bit offputting).
My understanding - or idea - with the voting pool is that there's an inherent 'unvote before lynch' agreement between all members. It's something I'm inviting my town-leaning reads to participate and interact in.
Spoiler:
"What do we do with people who are being scummy?"
We? Do you mean good mafia players? Good scumhunters? Yourself notionally as part of one of these groups? Yourself by extension onto the universe of how you think all Mafia players should act?
People? Me? Your grouping of all people who act scummily according to you? People who act in the same way as I am acting?
Scummy? The way I acted in this particular sequence? The assertion you are making?
I suppose one would attempt to scumhunt, assess or assert.
Determine the motivations of the non-specific players who "are being scummy".
---
Couple of follow-ups because I'm tired and have some work over the weekend.
Majiffy- something about something about three posts. I can't remember what you said but you're irritating me using your weight on someone I've already townread probably when you thought it was still RVS. Get off pie.
Also I'm taking keen mental notes on your interactions with Deas.
dolittle- another one. another naked townread. I don't know where you're getting this stuff from. Because you're not saying.
kayne- where'd you go?
---
My next post will probably have "fame", "lurksack" and "hall" in the title.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Look, I get pissed off when people attack when I *think* I should be coming across as obvtown. But I'm not exactly naive and other people's disbelief was one of the first things I encountered here - given that it was what I did first getting massively invested in a game.
Insert summary > good point > contraindication of your argument > encouragement to fuck off and scumhunt.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Anyway who says I'm acting scummy?
I'm acting unpredictably, but who benefits from that? Scum or town?
Have I tried to insist on a wagon?
Have I.. yah etc, you need to prove I'm being scum.
Tell you what Sakura. Would you like for me to follow you on votes for a bit? Nati owes me anyway and I'm bored with my votes and Beli well he'll sort himself. Or Nacho will.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
These are incredibly one-dimensional reasons for categorising players as your strongest townread and your lynch of choice.In post 471, DeasVail wrote:I don't think I can say more about Sakura than I already have. Nothing outright scummy, but her posting just falls flat for me. She seemed much more town where I saw her previously.
I think when kanye's scum he doesn't appear very town, whereas here he's pretty actively involved in scumhunting and what I'd expect from town-kanye.
I don't have a read on Sakura, but I would not consider her to be a good lynch because she's willing to respond in real-time and had the balls to snap-vote me.
Kanye lurked off attention when I basically accused him of being scum I wasn't going to do anything with. His entire game has been -naked no reason reads- -griping about playstyles- -arguing about mathematical probability- -lurking off negative attention-. He's managed to avoid explaining anything he's doing with regard to finding out who's scum. I don't see how you get to a strongest townread from there.
It means that there didn't appear to be any strong motivation or purpose behind pushing for several posts about a single post Majiffy made in which he failed to vote and snarked about RVS. It felt like busywork and gave you a reason not to scumhunt on anyone else.In post 471, DeasVail wrote:I'm not sure what you mean by soft-attacked, but it's probably what I was doing? Before now, I haven't had the confidence in him being scum to make a case of sorts (and I'm still not all that confident but sshh).
Not sure this says anything about Majiffy's alignment, actually. There was very little resistance to his wagon.
If I didn't think you were buddying before, I do now. Where someone buddying me might influence my opinion on them simply by virtue of the buddy - I either ignore it or don't look on it favourably.In post 471, DeasVail wrote:It's mostly already been explained, but talah because she is doing cool things to update her reads and figure people out, and I think it's much more effort to go to than scum would be bothered doing. I also agree with what others are saying about new scum likely to be more cautious than claiming 1-shot tracker and all that. Overall, her posting seems pretty genuine.
Dolittle hasn't made any posts which have made any sense to me but at the very least he's posting with some kind of regularity. The reasons he's given for a couple of his reads seem thrown together to me.In post 471, DeasVail wrote:DrDolittle is a much weaker read, and still almost completely based on what I mentioned before about being very different from his previous games. I thought that 350 wasn't so good though because obviously those townreads that he mentioned had no relevance to talah's actual point, so he's belittling talah's argument with something that isn't related to the point at all. This is a pretty weak thing though, so I'm still putting him as town, just more concerned about him than the others.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
I'm still waiting on Beli to interact here, the game's pretty much stalled for me until that happens.
Waynegg - any chance we can come to an uneasy truce? I'm happiest to lynch Emp at this stage; actually your scumreads are not too far off my lynch candidates. Not exactly scum reading you either - the flip-flop you did earlier on whether or not I was scum and the subsequent re-push actually has me reading you slightly town fwiw.
Matias - you happy to validate Nati as town?-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
K, ta.
I agree that (at least some of the) scum are fairly likely to be lurking heavily. I had a very similar experience in Open 509, where there were a couple of pretty aggressive players floating around (including myself heh) and scum basically froze up.
Considering Pyro for townbloc actually but not ready to nominate yet. Wanting to be sorted is pretty townie.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
How are you intending to identify scum? Are you expecting everyone else to do the work for you?In post 529, Belisarius wrote:I'm not seeing anything in your ISO worth reacting to since our last tete-a-tete, and I'm trying to work out who to voke next, so if you want to dance, take your best shot now.
How is anyone in the game supposed to get a read on you? Why shouldn't you be lynched aside from the fact you've interacted with virtually nobody up to this point?
Do you have any reads yet?-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
No, I had hoped for a mere second for a glimpse into your perfect lurkaderp town-win plan.In post 532, Belisarius wrote: You don'treallyexpect me to explain to the scum exactly how to beat me, right?
Right?
"Right"what?if you're expecting me to agree with you just because you're attempting to come off as aggressive, you've got no idea of how I function and are directly avoiding addressing it.
I can't think of a more useless statement you could have made, and combined with the above - your answer is effectively that you either don't have a plan or if you do, nobody but you needs to know about it.In post 532, Belisarius wrote:Petulance noted and filed for future reference.
You're an annoying addition to the lynch-pool until either myself or those I trust can give a read on you, and with aIn post 532, Belisarius wrote:I have no idea why the fuck anyone ever reads me the way they do in almost any game. I'm sure they'll keep on doing it, though.reasonfor the read.
Are you saying in most of your games you get townread "Because Beli"? I doubt it.
Do you have any idea then why people are voting you? It just could be because you're coming across as trying to dodge a lynch, no?In post 532, Belisarius wrote:I have no intention of trying to dodge a lynch. As far as I'm concerned, it's like turning on the bathroom light to make the sun come up. I'm just naturally transparent.
This does not pass for content. I don't have you pegged as a naturally aggressive or stubborn.In post 532, Belisarius wrote:Total completed games played : 20, over a period of just under a year
Total times mislynched : 1
Total times I've avoided a lynch on purpose, by force of effort : 0
No, I think I'll just sit back and let nature take its course with regards to defence.
I'm reading you asFAKE.
I expect you to be able to self-narrate and give a summary of your major reads any time anyone asks you to reiterate. Going back over your ISO would be something I'd do to validate that you're not just making shit up on the fly. And the fact you've been gone for what -three days or so- having dropped our conversation after you half-assed attack on me means I actually have been focussing on other interactions.In post 532, Belisarius wrote:Not enough townreads to make me happy. Actually, notanynon-gut townreads. My scumreads are pie, you, and wayne, which should be immediately apparent from even skimming my ISO. Hell, you could skim my ISO while drunk, riding a unicycle, and attempting to fend off attacks from pissed-off bees andstillget that much.
What do you think of Empking, specifically? His ISO should be pretty easy for you to backfill on.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
That crossed my mind in terms of wanting to be sorted *by Nacho* though. Which is actually a pretty effective scumhunt as well.In post 535, waynegg wrote:In post 528, talah wrote:Wrong. Wanting to be sorted is caring how you look. Caring how you look is scum.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
ed
That crossed my mind in terms of wanting to be sorted *by Nacho* though. Which is actually a pretty effective scumhunt as well.In post 535, waynegg wrote:Wrong. Wanting to be sorted is caring how you look. Caring how you look is scum.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
...and your explanation of why?In post 541, Belisarius wrote:No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die.
And what "case" might that be? Reading the thread is tech. My issue is your pointed lack of opinion and weak reasons for your votes. I'm still getting no actual content from you, even having challenged you to provide some.In post 541, Belisarius wrote:Is your "case" on me really so weak you need to put words in my mouth?
Great - well hop to whatever the hell it is you do then.In post 541, Belisarius wrote:I get townread for reasons I neither expect nor understand. That's not saying there aren't any reasons, it's saying I don't grok the reasons and I'm not willing to waste my time struggling for something that just happens by itself.
Are you following the thread? People are voting you to get a read on you, if I'm not mistaken.In post 541, Belisarius wrote:People are voting me because they're either wrong or scum. If I discern which is which, I'll vote that way. Until then, to hell with it.
Aww, pumpkin. I can smell the turtle's head nudging your underpants.In post 541, Belisarius wrote:Aww, muffin.
I did go over your ISO, and your reasons for voting are, simply put, shit.In post 541, Belisarius wrote:If you're not willing to go over my ISO -- especially since your main argument is "lol u don't post enough," meaning it's a short -- that just shows you don't actually care, because you already know my alignment.
I'm certainly getting a feel for your alignment.
Would you like to explain to me how waynegg and I are both scum? Have we been play-acting, or is this related to your multiball "townslip" earlier?
Dude, weak. I'm not seeing your priorities as anything except trying to get players who are actually reading the thread mislynched.In post 541, Belisarius wrote:That makes you a higher priority target than pie.
lolu
This game? Are you saying that despite having *no* read on Empking, you won't be voting him at all, ever?In post 541, Belisarius wrote:Short, alignment neutral, not looking like a juicy voke target this game.
Wow, that's two scum caught, do you care to name any others?-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
In post 297, talah wrote:I guess what I've learned about Empking, is that he responds well to pressure, so if he's not contributing, he definitely should be wagoned, preferably baselessly.-
-
talah
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
Fuck.In post 555, Schillinger wrote:Levi - skim of your ISO gives me a headache. How you reading Deas?
What about Emp? Why aren't you voting Emp?-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
For me, I'm seeing an association between Beli and Emp and am still slightly suspicious of Majiffy, so when Majiffy voted Emp with a sentence I didn't quite understand I was happy to follow along.
I'm pretty happy with Nati for town so far but he flicked on and off of Emp earlier and I wanted Emp to post something more substantial so I have no problem with driving Emp up to L-1.
Nacho has been slightly avoidance-based in his posts and I'd like to see him respond to Pyro who I think are being proactive.
I do believe waynegg is being quite proactive but unfortunately I rankle at being attacked for no good reason, even if I believe it has a purpose.
Mastin has shut down (although he is v/la weekends according to his sig, still he claims he has content and all I see are naked votes and a slight understanding of the suspicions I'm pushing - I want him to be a focus to see how others react) and there are numerous lurkers who could be, and might very well be, scum. Folks like dolittle and the dudes Matias and Nati mentioned. Mac's there too - one post?
I basically have a rather large pool of people I am suspicious of - and a reasonable pool of people I would lynch. Empking is one of them.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
On the quiet re Majiffy - I also understand the Empking push in terms of getting reads from people who will or not vote him - these are others like Nacho, Pyro, Mastin, DOLITTLE, and the lurkers.
Either it's an easy mislynch or a good lynch, idk. Either way we'll see people join the wagon naturally or opportunistically - or we'll see the wagon stall where it has a pretty good purpose.
What would be good here is a couple of free-spirited snap-voters to put the fear of god in a wagon.-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
talah Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: June 3, 2013
-
-
-
-