you know better than to vote for me....
on another note... I AM SO EXCITED ABOUT THIS GAME!!!
oh and hi coron.
zu's post is interesting, but i think its useless to analyze before we see other deaths.
attempt at humor, is there is no helpful content here.Axelrod wrote:Vote: Coron
One post and lurking already!
helpful because he confirmed what we all were talking about. someone changed the first post.Axelrod wrote:He said either "I'm out of the game" or "I have been eliminated from the game." "My alignment is townsperson," "My role is vanilla." So yeah, someone edited that.
same as above.Axelrod wrote:Also, the player's list has been edited, going from listing zu_Faul as "townsperson" in Blue, to just "Deceased."
Axelrod wrote:Wow, Raj. I think that is possibly the worst "analysis" I have ever seen. The game is under 35 posts old, and you are criticizing for a 1st post vote, being "helpful" but failing to analyze "voting trends," for not providing "real content," using "tunnel vision" and "avoiding other conversations." Absolutely the most horrid, slanted, 1-sided, hack job based on nothing I've ever read.
people wanted to know why i said it, multiple people. which i find odd because it was just a little comment.logicticus wrote: I don't like rajs post 60 because he throws in more hyperbole in my opinion. He calls axels post an OMGUS and then tosses in the fact that the two people who agreed on an explanation must be scumbuddies. Combine this with his explanation post that also threw the "kitchen sink" around and I don't like it.
noelvis_knits wrote:raj, are you scum?
good posting, thats why I am glad I didnt omgus vote you and stuck with my original gut.Axelrod wrote:I don't know about raj. His posts are strange, emotional and not well reasoned. But I also get the feeling he might just be that way in general. I may flip over to someone who's not participating soon unless they, you know, start participating.
logicticus wrote:a good majority of us realize there is nothing we can do about it and choose to go on scum hunting.
glork's is so abrasive than its easy for people to follow the lead. but they are all protecting the cam claim. thats why i finally decided that its plausible for him to be scum with them.rajrhcpfreak wrote:the glork addition is weaker because of his abrasive style. so those two could be following the lead of a crazy person.
you know at right i did, not i haven't gotten the same scummy vibes i had in the beginning of the game.Adel wrote:I feel she [DBG] is a much stronger lynch candidate than mathcam is. If nothing else, her association with this wagon should give the rest of you pause. At least unvote now and think about it.
so you dont want me to claim. you want the town to be in the dark about my role? this doesnt sound very pro town.mathcam wrote:I think it's too early to say I want him to be lynched. I want him to convince me why he shouldn't be lynched, or fail miserably in doing so, so that I can tell whether or not he is the right lynch. His role claim seems pretty irrelevant, and if he ends up not being lynched, I'd rather it remained secret, so no, I don't want him to claim.
im for it, i dont see any way it can hurt the town or help the mafia.mathcam wrote:Amusingly enough, I'm wondering if we shouldn'tallclaim our modpowers now.
ok, i vote off gut. i make a simple comment that my gut is feeling something, dont know if its the same thing. i then get questioned by multiple people to explain a gut feeling. so i did. im sorry that it wasnt the perfect pbp analyis since it was only a gut feeling that didnt even warrent a vote from me.Glork wrote:Random Vote, nothing to see here.
"Gut/Cap Logic on Vote/Bandwagon Time"... translation: Shamelessly wagoning, but claiming to have some "gut" behind it to "justify" it somewhat.
I think this post has been edited, because it originally had RAJ agreeing with my hunch-based Axelvote. Raj claims to see/agree with it, but not enough to jump a second time.
Reiterating his gut-vote on DGB... He asserts that his vote was due to her interactions with others. The extent of DGB's "interactions" at this point were a random-vote on Logic and a tongue-in-cheek comment towards him. I find it HIGHLY unlikely that you could've possibly formed a remotely solid "gut" opinion based on that. Somebody seems triggerhappy.
Throwaway post
This post was a response to a request to explain his Axelhunch. In his three-post PBPA, he openly criticizes Axel'sjoke/random vote on Coron. Axel's second post was still one of the FIRST FIFTEEN POSTS OF THE GAME, and the third post was an elaboration on the second. How could RAJ possibly expect to see meaningful analysis of "current voting trends"? The answer, plain and simple: He couldn't.
In his seventh post, Raj continues his attack on Axel, but states he won't vote for Axel. Axel's response was absolutely justified, and RAJ tries to pass it off as "the worst OMGUS in the world".
ok the people wanting me to explain a gut feeling were the same defending him. maybe it was a little over dramatic calling them scum buddies.Glork wrote:After some more heat, Raj backs down. He does throw out the comment that those defending Axel are "his scumbuddies."
Kiss and make up with Axel.
The next post is a doozie. Here, we see RAJ actually FoS Adel all on his own. Then he comments on how he wants to jump the Camwagon but won't so as to not "rush a lynch." Awww, how considerate.
Raj implies suspicion of Macros, and throws out a wishy-washy noncomment about how he "wants" to believe Pooks/EK are town but knows he shouldn't trust them. For somebody who eariler ACCUSED AXEL OF MAKING COMMENTS THAT DON'T ADD VALUE TO THE THREAD, this surprises me.
Macros unvotes, and Raj sees only 1 on th Camwagon
Less than 29 hours after saying he'll "hold off" putting Cam at Lynch-1, Raj puts Cam at Lynch-1.
ok if you looked at that post agian. i buy those three as a group but i thought that you might not be apart of it and macros and cam were using you to attack townies and then they follow your lead.Glork wrote:After Pooky went after Glork/Cam, and DGB posited Glork/Cam/Macros, RAJ "can uy" the scumteam
RAJ mentions WIFOM to debunk EK's defense of me. Not really much to see here.
More WIFOM discussion, strengthened by RAJ claiming he'd reveal exactly what I did. I should also point out that RAJ points out that everyone in the game is a "good player." This comes up in the next post.
Raj asserts his confidence in his scumgroup. He points out that all three people he picked out ended up voting for him, and accuses us all of mere OMGUS.
FIRSToff, I voted for you long before you accused me of being scumm, RAJ... back when you were trying to "suck my ass" (if I may use such a term). I switched off in the interim, but moved back after youratrocious"I buy the cam/glork/macros group" post.
SECONDLYwhile asserting that we're "good players," RAJ twice implies that we're making extremely obvious/rookie mistakes. First, our agreement with one another apparently makes us a scumgroup. Secondly, we ALL commit the SAME "scumtell" of "OMGUSing" Raj.
I call bullshit. Huge, enormous amounts of bullshit.
i dont know the relationship between you and cam. while i bought it earlier i made a mention that you might not be with those other two.Glork wrote:Raj goes after Cam for not claiming, which I can't really say is especially out of the ordinary. He also defends against EK, claiming that his play here really isn't all that different than usual. (Incidentally, I think that this type of defense is a scumtell in and of itself, but that's neither here nor there.)
Another throwaway
Again, Raj asserts that both (assuming a single scumgroup of three, which I am tentatively assuming) of Cam's scumbuddies are going out of their way to defend him D1.
Pseudo-defense of DGB (not getting "the same scummy vibes" he did on page one).
Throwaway re: editing of Jathan's posts.
"oh i agree" Note also that Raj keeps leeching my interrogation of Cam's behavior even as he claims that I'm Cam's scumbuddy. He'll respond with "distancing, naturally," but I find that hard to swallow.
Misread/Misrepresentation of Cam... obviously I'm biased at this point, so you know which one I think it is.
And, most recently, he agrees with coron that my posting of a list is a point against me.
-no need to agrue against it. they prolly are, but thats just me.Glork wrote: So there you have it:
-Overblown weak (if not nonexistent altogether) arguments.
-Shamless sheeping, leeching, and outright stealing from other people
-Contradictory and hypocritical statements
-Throwaway comments
what depresses me more is that you and pheobus would jump on to my bandwagon just because you are tired of the day.Macros wrote:Am I the only one depressed by this lenghty annoying day?
that could also been said with a townie. i know nothing because i have no mod ablities or anyother power. so i took it that claiming would work the same as a normal game. and would help the town.PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:It's also possible that the scum role/alignment structure is set up differently, and thus that scum didn't know how worthless it would be to push for a claim. Raj is the scummiest of those three, so he gets my vote.
oops sorry, you didnt use quote boxes, and i was lazy. sorryPookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i didnt write that